Softwr

Real Estate · head to head

Reonomy vs VTS

Reonomy logo

Reonomy

Real Estate

Commercial property ownership and contact data platform, acquired by Altus Group for roughly $202 million and now sold on unpublished, increasingly enterprise-focused pricing

From
On request
Rated
-
VTS logo

VTS

Real Estate

Leasing and asset management platform for commercial landlords, centralising deal pipeline, stacking plans and tenant activity with no published pricing

From
On request
Rated
-

The short version

  • Each has a real cost: Reonomy pricing is not published, and the sales process has become more enterprise-focused since the Altus Group acquisition, which reportedly makes it less accessible for smaller, self-service buyers than it once was.; VTS pricing is entirely unpublished, and reviewer sentiment specifically calls out cost as high for smaller teams or portfolios with limited leasing volume, meaning value is genuinely scale-dependent.
  • They diverge on capability: Reonomy covers Ownership records, VTS covers Deal pipeline tracking.
  • Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which Reonomy and VTS actually diverge.

Attributes where Reonomy and VTS differ
AttributeReonomyVTS
PlatformsWebWeb, iOS, Android

Identical on both: starting price (On request), pricing model (quote), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Real Estate).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in Reonomy

  • Ownership records
  • Transaction history
  • Off-market prospecting
  • Portfolio analysis
  • Contact data
  • Market and property search

Only in VTS

  • Deal pipeline tracking
  • Stacking plans
  • Lease expiration management
  • Market intelligence
  • Broker collaboration tools
  • Portfolio reporting

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

Reonomy

  • A broker sourcing off-market deals by identifying and directly contacting property owners matching acquisition criterianot VTS
  • A lender researching an owner portfolio and financing history before extending creditnot VTS
  • An investor doing outbound outreach to owners of a specific property type or size in a target marketnot VTS
  • A firm already using ARGUS Enterprise considering Reonomy for data given the shared Altus Group ownershipnot VTS

VTS

  • A landlord with dozens of properties needing real-time stacking plan visibility across the whole portfolionot Reonomy
  • An asset manager tracking lease expirations months ahead to plan renewal or re-leasing strategynot Reonomy
  • A large leasing team wanting centralised deal pipeline data shared with representing brokersnot Reonomy
  • An institutional owner wanting portfolio-level leasing velocity reporting for investor updatesnot Reonomy

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

Reonomy

  • Pricing is not published, and the sales process has become more enterprise-focused since the Altus Group acquisition, which reportedly makes it less accessible for smaller, self-service buyers than it once was.
  • It is a data and contact-sourcing tool, not a valuation platform, so firms needing DCF modelling still need ARGUS Enterprise or an equivalent separately, even though both are Altus Group products.
  • Coverage and data freshness for ownership and contact information vary by market, and off-market sourcing quality depends on how current that contact data actually is.
  • Shared ownership with ARGUS under Altus Group means a firm concentrating spend with both products has less independent competitive leverage across its CRE software and data budget.
  • As with any owner-contact database, deliverability and accuracy of contact information degrade over time, and there is no independent public benchmark of Reonomy data accuracy to check ahead of purchase.

VTS

  • Pricing is entirely unpublished, and reviewer sentiment specifically calls out cost as high for smaller teams or portfolios with limited leasing volume, meaning value is genuinely scale-dependent.
  • A single-building or small-portfolio owner gets comparatively little benefit from cross-portfolio features that are the platform core selling point, so the cost-to-value ratio is worse at small scale.
  • It manages leasing and asset data but is not a full property management or accounting system, so most landlords still run VTS alongside Yardi, MRI or a similar system rather than instead of one.
  • Broker adoption varies, so a landlord depending on shared deal tracking with external brokers has limited control over whether those brokers actually use the platform consistently.
  • As a data-centralisation tool, the value depends heavily on disciplined data entry from leasing staff, and inconsistent use degrades the stacking plan and pipeline accuracy the platform is sold on.

Pricing, plan by plan

Reonomy

On request
  • Reonomy$undefined/year
    • Monthly and annual subscription options, annual saves roughly 30%
    • Pricing not published, increasingly enterprise-focused sales process since Altus Group acquisition
    • Cost scales with data access scope and seats

VTS

On request
  • VTS$undefined/year
    • No published pricing, quote required
    • Cost scales with portfolio size and building count
    • Separate landlord and broker-facing products

Which should you pick?

Choose Reonomy if

  • You need ownership records.
  • You also want transaction history.

Choose VTS if

  • You need deal pipeline tracking.
  • You work on Web, iOS, Android.
  • You also want stacking plans.

Questions people ask

Is Reonomy or VTS better?
Neither clearly leads. Reonomy starts at On request and VTS at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, Reonomy or VTS?
Reonomy starts at On request and VTS at On request.
Does Reonomy or VTS run on more platforms?
Reonomy runs on Web. VTS runs on Web, iOS, Android.
What is Reonomy best used for?
Reonomy is most often used for a broker sourcing off-market deals by identifying and directly contacting property owners matching acquisition criteria, a lender researching an owner portfolio and financing history before extending credit, an investor doing outbound outreach to owners of a specific property type or size in a target market, a firm already using argus enterprise considering reonomy for data given the shared altus group ownership. Of those, a broker sourcing off-market deals by identifying and directly contacting property owners matching acquisition criteria and a lender researching an owner portfolio and financing history before extending credit are not what VTS is typically brought in for.
What can Reonomy do that VTS cannot?
Reonomy covers Ownership records, Transaction history, Off-market prospecting, Portfolio analysis. VTS covers Deal pipeline tracking, Stacking plans, Lease expiration management, Market intelligence.

Answered from the vendors’ own pages

Reonomy: Who owns Reonomy?

Altus Group, which acquired it in November 2021 for roughly $202 million; it sits in the same portfolio as ARGUS Enterprise.

VTS: Is VTS for tenants or landlords?

Landlords and their leasing and asset management teams. There is a separate broker-facing product, but tenants are not the customer.

Reonomy: Is Reonomy the same as CoStar?

No. Reonomy focuses on ownership, contact and off-market sourcing data; CoStar is broader, covering listings, lease comparables and market analytics at larger scale.

VTS: How much does VTS cost?

Pricing is not published anywhere; cost is quoted based on portfolio size and building count.

Reonomy: Is pricing available online?

No. Reonomy offers monthly and annual subscriptions with roughly 30% savings annually, but exact rates require a quote.

VTS: Does VTS replace property management software?

No. It manages leasing pipeline and asset data; landlords typically still run separate property management and accounting systems such as Yardi Voyager or MRI Software alongside it.

Share

Related pages

Other head to heads