Real Estate · head to head
Reonomy vs Sell.Do

Reonomy
Real Estate
Commercial property ownership and contact data platform, acquired by Altus Group for roughly $202 million and now sold on unpublished, increasingly enterprise-focused pricing
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Sell.Do
Real Estate
Indian real estate CRM covering enquiry to registration, including unit inventory and post-sales collections
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Reonomy pricing is not published, and the sales process has become more enterprise-focused since the Altus Group acquisition, which reportedly makes it less accessible for smaller, self-service buyers than it once was.; Sell.Do no pricing is published, and the quote stacks a per-user fee with usage-billed AI, WhatsApp, SMS and telephony volumes, so the monthly bill is variable and hard to budget in advance.
- They diverge on capability: Reonomy covers Ownership records, Sell.Do covers Lead aggregation.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Reonomy and Sell.Do actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (On request), pricing model (quote), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Real Estate).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Reonomy
- Ownership records
- Transaction history
- Off-market prospecting
- Portfolio analysis
- Contact data
- Market and property search
Only in Sell.Do
- Lead aggregation
- Telephony and call analysis
- Unit inventory
- Site visit management
- Booking and agreement
- Post-sales collections
- Channel partner portal
- Jarvis AI scoring
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Reonomy
- A broker sourcing off-market deals by identifying and directly contacting property owners matching acquisition criterianot Sell.Do
- A lender researching an owner portfolio and financing history before extending creditnot Sell.Do
- An investor doing outbound outreach to owners of a specific property type or size in a target marketnot Sell.Do
- A firm already using ARGUS Enterprise considering Reonomy for data given the shared Altus Group ownershipnot Sell.Do
Sell.Do
- An Indian residential developer whose bookings are tracked in a CRM but whose collections still live in Excelnot Reonomy
- A developer running channel partner networks that must attribute a sale and a commission to the right partner months after the enquirynot Reonomy
- A sales team buying leads from multiple portals and paid campaigns who cannot currently tell which source produces site visits rather than clicksnot Reonomy
- A project launch where unit inventory must be visible and blockable live across a large sales floornot Reonomy
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Reonomy
- Pricing is not published, and the sales process has become more enterprise-focused since the Altus Group acquisition, which reportedly makes it less accessible for smaller, self-service buyers than it once was.
- It is a data and contact-sourcing tool, not a valuation platform, so firms needing DCF modelling still need ARGUS Enterprise or an equivalent separately, even though both are Altus Group products.
- Coverage and data freshness for ownership and contact information vary by market, and off-market sourcing quality depends on how current that contact data actually is.
- Shared ownership with ARGUS under Altus Group means a firm concentrating spend with both products has less independent competitive leverage across its CRE software and data budget.
- As with any owner-contact database, deliverability and accuracy of contact information degrade over time, and there is no independent public benchmark of Reonomy data accuracy to check ahead of purchase.
Sell.Do
- No pricing is published, and the quote stacks a per-user fee with usage-billed AI, WhatsApp, SMS and telephony volumes, so the monthly bill is variable and hard to budget in advance.
- The five-user minimum means small brokerages pay for seats they do not use.
- Aurum PropTech now holds a majority stake of roughly 84 per cent, so product direction serves a listed parent with a wide proptech portfolio, and buyers should get roadmap and data-portability commitments in writing.
- The product is written around Indian property practice, portals and payment structures, so it has little application outside India and no meaningful presence in other markets.
- Deep configuration of inventory, price lists and approval workflow is required before go-live, so implementation is measured in weeks and depends on vendor availability rather than self-service setup.
Pricing, plan by plan
Reonomy
On request- Reonomy$undefined/year
- Monthly and annual subscription options, annual saves roughly 30%
- Pricing not published, increasingly enterprise-focused sales process since Altus Group acquisition
- Cost scales with data access scope and seats
Sell.Do
On request- Sell.Do$undefined/month
- Per active user per month, minimum five users
- Core CRM or full suite with inventory, channel partner, post-sales modules
- AI features such as lead scoring and voice agents billed as usage on top
Which should you pick?
Choose Sell.Do if
- You need lead aggregation.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want telephony and call analysis.
Questions people ask
- Is Reonomy or Sell.Do better?
- Neither clearly leads. Reonomy starts at On request and Sell.Do at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Reonomy or Sell.Do?
- Reonomy starts at On request and Sell.Do at On request.
- Does Reonomy or Sell.Do run on more platforms?
- Reonomy runs on Web. Sell.Do runs on Web, iOS, Android.
- What is Reonomy best used for?
- Reonomy is most often used for a broker sourcing off-market deals by identifying and directly contacting property owners matching acquisition criteria, a lender researching an owner portfolio and financing history before extending credit, an investor doing outbound outreach to owners of a specific property type or size in a target market, a firm already using argus enterprise considering reonomy for data given the shared altus group ownership. Of those, a broker sourcing off-market deals by identifying and directly contacting property owners matching acquisition criteria and a lender researching an owner portfolio and financing history before extending credit are not what Sell.Do is typically brought in for.
- What can Reonomy do that Sell.Do cannot?
- Reonomy covers Ownership records, Transaction history, Off-market prospecting, Portfolio analysis. Sell.Do covers Lead aggregation, Telephony and call analysis, Unit inventory, Site visit management.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Reonomy: Who owns Reonomy?
Altus Group, which acquired it in November 2021 for roughly $202 million; it sits in the same portfolio as ARGUS Enterprise.
Sell.Do: Who owns Sell.Do?
Aurum PropTech, a company listed on the Indian exchanges, holds a majority stake of around 84 per cent after increasing its shareholding.
Reonomy: Is Reonomy the same as CoStar?
No. Reonomy focuses on ownership, contact and off-market sourcing data; CoStar is broader, covering listings, lease comparables and market analytics at larger scale.
Sell.Do: Does it handle post-booking collections?
Yes, construction-linked demand generation, receipts and outstanding follow-up are part of the product, which is the main reason developers choose it over a general CRM.
Reonomy: Is pricing available online?
No. Reonomy offers monthly and annual subscriptions with roughly 30% savings annually, but exact rates require a quote.
Sell.Do: What does it cost?
It is quote only, priced per active user per month with a five-user minimum, plus usage charges for AI, WhatsApp, SMS and telephony.
Sell.Do: Is it available outside India?
It is built for Indian property practice and portals. Buyers elsewhere will find the inventory, payment and compliance model does not match local process.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Reonomy vs CoStar
- Reonomy vs CREXi
- Reonomy vs MRI Software
- Reonomy vs VTS
- Reonomy vs AppFolio
- Reonomy vs RealPage
- Reonomy vs Rent Manager
- Reonomy vs Rentec Direct
- Reonomy vs Hemlane
- Reonomy vs Buildium
- Reonomy vs Redfin
- Reonomy vs TenantCloud
- Reonomy vs Entrata
- Reonomy vs LoopNet
- Reonomy vs Follow Up Boss
- Reonomy vs DoorLoop
- Reonomy vs Propertyware
- Reonomy vs ARGUS Enterprise
- Reonomy vs Yardi Voyager
- Reonomy vs Lofty
- Reonomy vs Zillow
- Reonomy vs BoldTrail
- Sell.Do vs CoStar
- Sell.Do vs CREXi
- Sell.Do vs MRI Software
- Sell.Do vs VTS
- Sell.Do vs AppFolio
- Sell.Do vs RealPage
- Sell.Do vs Rent Manager
- Sell.Do vs Rentec Direct
- Sell.Do vs Hemlane
- Sell.Do vs Buildium
- Sell.Do vs Redfin
- Sell.Do vs TenantCloud
- Sell.Do vs Entrata
- Sell.Do vs LoopNet
- Sell.Do vs Follow Up Boss
- Sell.Do vs DoorLoop
- Sell.Do vs Propertyware
- Sell.Do vs ARGUS Enterprise
- Sell.Do vs Yardi Voyager
- Sell.Do vs Lofty
- Sell.Do vs Zillow
- Sell.Do vs BoldTrail
