Softwr

Real Estate · head to head

DoorLoop vs VTS

DoorLoop logo

DoorLoop

Real Estate

Cloud property management with double entry accounting, priced per unit above a monthly minimum

From
On request
Rated
-
Full reviewWebsite
VTS logo

VTS

Real Estate

Leasing and asset management platform for commercial landlords, centralising deal pipeline, stacking plans and tenant activity with no published pricing

From
On request
Rated
-
Full reviewWebsite

The short version

  • Each has a real cost: DoorLoop pricing is per unit against a monthly minimum, so a 20 unit portfolio pays the same as one two or three times the size and the real cost per unit lands far above the advertised figure.; VTS pricing is entirely unpublished, and reviewer sentiment specifically calls out cost as high for smaller teams or portfolios with limited leasing volume, meaning value is genuinely scale-dependent.
  • They diverge on capability: DoorLoop covers Double entry accounting, VTS covers Deal pipeline tracking.
  • Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which DoorLoop and VTS actually diverge.

Attributes where DoorLoop and VTS differ
AttributeDoorLoopVTS
Pricing modelPer unit per month with a monthly minimumquote

Identical on both: starting price (On request), free tier (No), platforms (Web, iOS, Android), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Real Estate).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in DoorLoop

  • Double entry accounting
  • Tenant and owner portals
  • Rent collection
  • Listing syndication
  • Maintenance and work orders
  • Tenant screening
  • E-signature
  • Reporting

Only in VTS

  • Deal pipeline tracking
  • Stacking plans
  • Lease expiration management
  • Market intelligence
  • Broker collaboration tools
  • Portfolio reporting

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

DoorLoop

  • A third-party manager with 100 to 500 residential units moving off spreadsheets and a desktop accounting packagenot VTS
  • A landlord who self-manages several small multifamily buildings and wants owners, tenants and the ledger in one placenot VTS
  • A manager who needs trust accounting that survives a state audit without maintaining a separate bookkeeping systemnot VTS
  • An operator consolidating rent collection onto one rail so that arrears reporting is accurate on the day rather than a week laternot VTS

VTS

  • A landlord with dozens of properties needing real-time stacking plan visibility across the whole portfolionot DoorLoop
  • An asset manager tracking lease expirations months ahead to plan renewal or re-leasing strategynot DoorLoop
  • A large leasing team wanting centralised deal pipeline data shared with representing brokersnot DoorLoop
  • An institutional owner wanting portfolio-level leasing velocity reporting for investor updatesnot DoorLoop

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

DoorLoop

  • Pricing is per unit against a monthly minimum, so a 20 unit portfolio pays the same as one two or three times the size and the real cost per unit lands far above the advertised figure.
  • Payment processing margin is part of how the vendor earns, so the subscription understates total cost: card fees are usually passed to residents, ACH terms differ by plan, and the spread is not negotiable at small volumes.
  • First term pricing is discounted aggressively, which means the renewal quote is materially higher than the number that won the deal, and the deeper discounts are attached to multi-year commitments.
  • Commercial lease administration is shallow: CAM reconciliation, percentage rent and complex escalation schedules are not handled at the level a mixed commercial and residential portfolio requires.
  • The vendor is younger than Buildium, AppFolio or Yardi, so the third-party integration catalogue and the pool of consultants who can migrate legacy data are both much smaller.

VTS

  • Pricing is entirely unpublished, and reviewer sentiment specifically calls out cost as high for smaller teams or portfolios with limited leasing volume, meaning value is genuinely scale-dependent.
  • A single-building or small-portfolio owner gets comparatively little benefit from cross-portfolio features that are the platform core selling point, so the cost-to-value ratio is worse at small scale.
  • It manages leasing and asset data but is not a full property management or accounting system, so most landlords still run VTS alongside Yardi, MRI or a similar system rather than instead of one.
  • Broker adoption varies, so a landlord depending on shared deal tracking with external brokers has limited control over whether those brokers actually use the platform consistently.
  • As a data-centralisation tool, the value depends heavily on disciplined data entry from leasing staff, and inconsistent use degrades the stacking plan and pipeline accuracy the platform is sold on.

Pricing, plan by plan

DoorLoop

On request
  • Starter$undefined/month
    • Charged per unit against a monthly minimum
    • Accounting, rent collection and tenant portal
    • Standard reporting
  • Pro$undefined/month
    • Charged per unit against a higher monthly minimum
    • Owner portal and owner statements
    • QuickBooks sync
  • Premium$undefined/month
    • Charged per unit against the highest monthly minimum
    • Dedicated onboarding and priority support
    • API access

VTS

On request
  • VTS$undefined/year
    • No published pricing, quote required
    • Cost scales with portfolio size and building count
    • Separate landlord and broker-facing products

Which should you pick?

Choose DoorLoop if

  • You need double entry accounting.
  • You work on Web, iOS, Android.
  • You also want tenant and owner portals.
DoorLoop review

Choose VTS if

  • You need deal pipeline tracking.
  • You work on Web, iOS, Android.
  • You also want stacking plans.
VTS review

Questions people ask

Is DoorLoop or VTS better?
Neither clearly leads. DoorLoop starts at On request and VTS at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, DoorLoop or VTS?
DoorLoop starts at On request and VTS at On request.
Does DoorLoop or VTS run on more platforms?
Both run on Web, iOS, Android, so platform support will not decide this one for you.
What is DoorLoop best used for?
DoorLoop is most often used for a third-party manager with 100 to 500 residential units moving off spreadsheets and a desktop accounting package, a landlord who self-manages several small multifamily buildings and wants owners, tenants and the ledger in one place, a manager who needs trust accounting that survives a state audit without maintaining a separate bookkeeping system, an operator consolidating rent collection onto one rail so that arrears reporting is accurate on the day rather than a week later. Of those, a third-party manager with 100 to 500 residential units moving off spreadsheets and a desktop accounting package and a landlord who self-manages several small multifamily buildings and wants owners, tenants and the ledger in one place are not what VTS is typically brought in for.
What can DoorLoop do that VTS cannot?
DoorLoop covers Double entry accounting, Tenant and owner portals, Rent collection, Listing syndication. VTS covers Deal pipeline tracking, Stacking plans, Lease expiration management, Market intelligence.

Answered from the vendors’ own pages

DoorLoop: What does it actually cost for a 20 unit portfolio?

You pay the monthly minimum, not 20 times the per unit rate, so the effective cost per unit is several times the headline. Ask for the minimum in writing before you discuss the per unit figure.

VTS: Is VTS for tenants or landlords?

Landlords and their leasing and asset management teams. There is a separate broker-facing product, but tenants are not the customer.

DoorLoop: Does DoorLoop handle trust accounting?

Yes. The ledger is double entry with separate trust and operating accounts, owner draws and statements, which is what state licensing audits look for.

VTS: How much does VTS cost?

Pricing is not published anywhere; cost is quoted based on portfolio size and building count.

DoorLoop: Who pays the card fee on rent?

Normally the resident. ACH pricing varies by plan and by negotiated volume, and processing is where a meaningful share of the vendor revenue comes from.

VTS: Does VTS replace property management software?

No. It manages leasing pipeline and asset data; landlords typically still run separate property management and accounting systems such as Yardi Voyager or MRI Software alongside it.

DoorLoop: Is it suitable for commercial property?

For simple commercial leases yes. For CAM reconciliation, percentage rent or institutional reporting you want Yardi or MRI instead.

Share

Related pages

More on DoorLoop

More on VTS

Keep looking

Other head to heads