Maps · head to head
onX Maps vs Webfleet

onX Maps
Maps
Land ownership and offline navigation apps sold as separate subscriptions per activity: Hunt, Offroad, Backcountry
- From
- On request
- Free plan
- No

Webfleet
Fleet Management
European fleet telematics, owned by Bridgestone since the TomTom Telematics sale
- From
- On request
- Free plan
- No
The short version
- Each has a real cost: onX Maps hunt, Offroad and Backcountry are entirely separate subscriptions, so a user needing more than one activity pays for more than one product with no combined bundle discount.; Webfleet ownership sits with a tyre manufacturer, so product investment follows the tyre and vehicle services strategy, and features that do not feed that business have historically moved slowly.
- They diverge on capability: onX Maps covers Land ownership boundaries, Webfleet covers Tachograph management.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which onX Maps and Webfleet actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (On request), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in onX Maps
- Land ownership boundaries
- Offline maps
- Waypoint and track marking
- Elite tier private land data
- 3D terrain view
- Weather overlay
Only in Webfleet
- Tachograph management
- OptiDrive 360
- LINK devices
- PRO driver terminals
- Tyre and vehicle data
- Video telematics
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
onX Maps
- A hunter who needs to know exact private and public land boundaries before crossing onto a propertynot Webfleet
- An off-road driver planning a trail route with land ownership and access datanot Webfleet
- A backcountry skier or hiker wanting offline terrain maps without cell signalnot Webfleet
- Someone who does two or more of these activities and needs to budget for two or three separate subscriptionsnot Webfleet
Webfleet
- A haulage operator running heavy goods vehicles across EU borders that must download tachograph data remotely and prove driving-time compliancenot onX Maps
- A European van fleet that wants driver coaching and fuel reporting without buying an American platform with unused compliance modulesnot onX Maps
- An organisation already buying Bridgestone tyres and maintenance that can fold telematics into an existing service contractnot onX Maps
- Fleets that want in-cab navigation and job dispatch on a dedicated driver terminal rather than a phone appnot onX Maps
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
onX Maps
- Hunt, Offroad and Backcountry are entirely separate subscriptions, so a user needing more than one activity pays for more than one product with no combined bundle discount.
- Elite-tier pricing at roughly $99.99 a year per product is expensive if a buyer only occasionally needs the private land ownership data it adds.
- The apps are US and Canada focused, with more limited usefulness for international travel compared to a global mapping product.
- Land ownership data, while extensive, can lag real-world changes in property boundaries in fast-changing areas.
- It is not a general-purpose hiking or trail-review app in the way AllTrails or Gaia GPS are, so casual hikers without a land-boundary need may find the focus narrower than expected.
Webfleet
- Ownership sits with a tyre manufacturer, so product investment follows the tyre and vehicle services strategy, and features that do not feed that business have historically moved slowly.
- North American coverage is thin next to the European operation, with a smaller partner network and an hours of service product that is not competitive with purpose-built ELD vendors.
- Useful compliance capability sits in add-on tiers, so remote tachograph download and advanced reporting push the real per vehicle cost well above the entry quote.
- The camera line arrived later than the market and offers less on-device detection and less coaching workflow than Lytx or Samsara, so safety-driven buyers often end up running a second system.
- Contracts are hardware-led and usually multi-year, so replacing Webfleet means either running out the term or writing off installed devices that have no resale value.
Pricing, plan by plan
onX Maps
On request- onX Hunt Elite$99.99/year
- Nationwide private land ownership data
- Recent satellite imagery
- Offline maps
- onX Offroad Premium$34.99/year
- Trail and land ownership maps for off-road use
- Offline maps
- onX Offroad Elite$99.99/year
- Everything in Premium plus nationwide land ownership and recent imagery
- onX Backcountry$29.99/year
- Backcountry ski and hike focused maps
- Offline maps
- Avalanche and terrain data
Webfleet
On request- Webfleet$undefined/year
- Per vehicle subscription in feature tiers
- Hardware bought outright or amortised over the term
- Tachograph and remote download sold as add-ons
Which should you pick?
Choose onX Maps if
- You need land ownership boundaries.
- You work on iOS, Android, Web.
- You also want offline maps.
Choose Webfleet if
- You need tachograph management.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want optidrive 360.
Questions people ask
- Is onX Maps or Webfleet better?
- Neither clearly leads. onX Maps starts at On request and Webfleet at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, onX Maps or Webfleet?
- onX Maps starts at On request and Webfleet at On request.
- Does onX Maps or Webfleet run on more platforms?
- onX Maps runs on iOS, Android, Web. Webfleet runs on Web, iOS, Android.
- What is onX Maps best used for?
- onX Maps is most often used for a hunter who needs to know exact private and public land boundaries before crossing onto a property, an off-road driver planning a trail route with land ownership and access data, a backcountry skier or hiker wanting offline terrain maps without cell signal, someone who does two or more of these activities and needs to budget for two or three separate subscriptions. Of those, a hunter who needs to know exact private and public land boundaries before crossing onto a property and an off-road driver planning a trail route with land ownership and access data are not what Webfleet is typically brought in for.
- What can onX Maps do that Webfleet cannot?
- onX Maps covers Land ownership boundaries, Offline maps, Waypoint and track marking, Elite tier private land data. Webfleet covers Tachograph management, OptiDrive 360, LINK devices, PRO driver terminals.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
onX Maps: Can I use one onX subscription for both hunting and off-roading?
No, onX Hunt, onX Offroad and onX Backcountry are separate apps with separate subscriptions.
Webfleet: Is Webfleet still connected to TomTom?
No. TomTom sold the telematics business to Bridgestone in 2019. There is still navigation and mapping heritage in the driver terminals, but the owner and the strategy are Bridgestone.
onX Maps: What does the Elite tier add?
Elite tiers add nationwide private land ownership data, more recent satellite imagery and partner discounts on top of the base Premium tier.
Webfleet: Can it handle US ELD requirements?
There is an offering, but it is not the strength of the platform. A fleet whose main problem is US hours of service compliance should look at vendors built around that mandate.
onX Maps: Does onX work outside the US?
Coverage is strongest in the US and Canada; usefulness elsewhere is limited.
Webfleet: Do I have to buy Bridgestone tyres to use it?
No. The tyre services integration is optional. It is worth pricing as a bundle if you already buy from Bridgestone, because that is where the discounting sits.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- onX Maps vs Gaia GPS
- onX Maps vs Trailforks
- onX Maps vs AllTrails
- onX Maps vs Ride with GPS
- onX Maps vs Google Maps
- onX Maps vs Citymapper
- onX Maps vs Felt
- onX Maps vs SW Maps
- onX Maps vs Geographic Calculator
- onX Maps vs Foursquare Spatial Studio
- onX Maps vs ArcGIS Survey123
- onX Maps vs Agisoft Metashape
- onX Maps vs Sygic GPS Navigation
- onX Maps vs TomTom
- onX Maps vs Transit
- onX Maps vs Waze
- onX Maps vs What3words
- onX Maps vs TomTom Developer Portal
- onX Maps vs Samsara
- onX Maps vs Geotab
- onX Maps vs Teletrac Navman
- onX Maps vs Lytx
- onX Maps vs Motive
- onX Maps vs Fleet Complete
- onX Maps vs Uptake
- onX Maps vs AssetWorks
- onX Maps vs Omnitracs
- onX Maps vs Chevin FleetWave
- onX Maps vs CalAmp
- onX Maps vs Whip Around
- onX Maps vs Ridecell
- onX Maps vs Zonar Systems
- onX Maps vs NexTraq
- Webfleet vs Gaia GPS
- Webfleet vs Trailforks
- Webfleet vs AllTrails
- Webfleet vs Ride with GPS
- Webfleet vs Google Maps
- Webfleet vs Citymapper
- Webfleet vs Felt
- Webfleet vs SW Maps
- Webfleet vs Geographic Calculator
- Webfleet vs Foursquare Spatial Studio
- Webfleet vs ArcGIS Survey123
- Webfleet vs Agisoft Metashape
- Webfleet vs Sygic GPS Navigation
- Webfleet vs TomTom
- Webfleet vs Transit
- Webfleet vs Waze
- Webfleet vs What3words
- Webfleet vs TomTom Developer Portal
- Webfleet vs Samsara
- Webfleet vs Geotab
- Webfleet vs Teletrac Navman
- Webfleet vs Lytx
- Webfleet vs Motive
- Webfleet vs Fleet Complete
- Webfleet vs Uptake
- Webfleet vs AssetWorks
- Webfleet vs Omnitracs
- Webfleet vs Chevin FleetWave
- Webfleet vs CalAmp
- Webfleet vs Whip Around
- Webfleet vs Ridecell
- Webfleet vs Zonar Systems
- Webfleet vs NexTraq
