Maps · head to head
Google Maps vs Webfleet

Google Maps
Maps
Consumer navigation and local search app, distinct from the paid Google Maps Platform developer API
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes

Webfleet
Fleet Management
European fleet telematics, owned by Bridgestone since the TomTom Telematics sale
- From
- On request
- Free plan
- No
The short version
- Only Google Maps has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Google Maps location history (Timeline) is stored to the Google account unless disabled, and many users are unaware of how much of their movement is retained by default.; Webfleet ownership sits with a tyre manufacturer, so product investment follows the tyre and vehicle services strategy, and features that do not feed that business have historically moved slowly.
- They diverge on capability: Google Maps covers Turn-by-turn navigation, Webfleet covers Tachograph management.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Google Maps and Webfleet actually diverge.
| Attribute | Google Maps | Webfleet |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free | On request |
| Pricing model | Free consumer app, funded by Google's advertising business | quote |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Platforms | iOS, Android, Web | Web, iOS, Android |
| Category | Maps | Fleet Management |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Google Maps
- Turn-by-turn navigation
- Local search
- Offline maps
- Street View
- Timeline location history
- Live transit and incident reporting
Only in Webfleet
- Tachograph management
- OptiDrive 360
- LINK devices
- PRO driver terminals
- Tyre and vehicle data
- Video telematics
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Google Maps
- Getting turn-by-turn driving or transit directions to a destinationnot Webfleet
- Searching for and comparing nearby restaurants, shops or services with reviewsnot Webfleet
- Downloading an offline map before travelling somewhere with unreliable data coveragenot Webfleet
- Checking real time traffic conditions before or during a drivenot Webfleet
Webfleet
- A haulage operator running heavy goods vehicles across EU borders that must download tachograph data remotely and prove driving-time compliancenot Google Maps
- A European van fleet that wants driver coaching and fuel reporting without buying an American platform with unused compliance modulesnot Google Maps
- An organisation already buying Bridgestone tyres and maintenance that can fold telematics into an existing service contractnot Google Maps
- Fleets that want in-cab navigation and job dispatch on a dedicated driver terminal rather than a phone appnot Google Maps
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Google Maps
- Location history (Timeline) is stored to the Google account unless disabled, and many users are unaware of how much of their movement is retained by default.
- Local business rankings and prominent ads mix paid placement with organic results, so top results are not purely a relevance ranking.
- Offline maps expire after a period and must be manually refreshed, which can catch travellers out if they rely on an old download without checking it.
- Public transit data quality varies significantly by city and country, and is considerably weaker or absent in many smaller or lower-income regions.
- It is a different product from Google Maps Platform, the paid developer API, and businesses evaluating navigation for their own app need to compare that API's pricing separately rather than assuming free consumer access extends to embedding.
Webfleet
- Ownership sits with a tyre manufacturer, so product investment follows the tyre and vehicle services strategy, and features that do not feed that business have historically moved slowly.
- North American coverage is thin next to the European operation, with a smaller partner network and an hours of service product that is not competitive with purpose-built ELD vendors.
- Useful compliance capability sits in add-on tiers, so remote tachograph download and advanced reporting push the real per vehicle cost well above the entry quote.
- The camera line arrived later than the market and offers less on-device detection and less coaching workflow than Lytx or Samsara, so safety-driven buyers often end up running a second system.
- Contracts are hardware-led and usually multi-year, so replacing Webfleet means either running out the term or writing off installed devices that have no resale value.
Pricing, plan by plan
Google Maps
Free- FreeFree
- Unlimited navigation and local search
- Offline maps included
- No subscription tier for the consumer app
Webfleet
On request- Webfleet$undefined/year
- Per vehicle subscription in feature tiers
- Hardware bought outright or amortised over the term
- Tachograph and remote download sold as add-ons
Which should you pick?
Choose Google Maps if
- You need turn-by-turn navigation.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on iOS, Android, Web.
- You also want local search.
Choose Webfleet if
- You need tachograph management.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want optidrive 360.
Questions people ask
- Is Google Maps or Webfleet better?
- Neither clearly leads. Google Maps starts at Free and Webfleet at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Google Maps or Webfleet?
- Google Maps has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Google Maps and On request for Webfleet.
- Does Google Maps or Webfleet run on more platforms?
- Google Maps runs on iOS, Android, Web. Webfleet runs on Web, iOS, Android.
- Can I use Google Maps for free?
- Yes. Google Maps has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Webfleet starts at On request.
- What is Google Maps best used for?
- Google Maps is most often used for getting turn-by-turn driving or transit directions to a destination, searching for and comparing nearby restaurants, shops or services with reviews, downloading an offline map before travelling somewhere with unreliable data coverage, checking real time traffic conditions before or during a drive. Of those, getting turn-by-turn driving or transit directions to a destination and searching for and comparing nearby restaurants, shops or services with reviews are not what Webfleet is typically brought in for.
- What can Google Maps do that Webfleet cannot?
- Google Maps covers Turn-by-turn navigation, Local search, Offline maps, Street View. Webfleet covers Tachograph management, OptiDrive 360, LINK devices, PRO driver terminals.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Google Maps: Is Google Maps free?
Yes, the consumer app is free with no subscription for navigation, local search or offline maps.
Webfleet: Is Webfleet still connected to TomTom?
No. TomTom sold the telematics business to Bridgestone in 2019. There is still navigation and mapping heritage in the driver terminals, but the owner and the strategy are Bridgestone.
Google Maps: Is this the same as Google Maps Platform?
No, Google Maps Platform is a separate, metered API product sold to developers embedding map functionality into their own apps and websites, with its own usage-based pricing.
Webfleet: Can it handle US ELD requirements?
There is an offering, but it is not the strength of the platform. A fleet whose main problem is US hours of service compliance should look at vendors built around that mandate.
Google Maps: Does Google Maps track my location history?
It can, through the optional Timeline feature, which is on by default in some configurations and can be reviewed or disabled in Google account settings.
Webfleet: Do I have to buy Bridgestone tyres to use it?
No. The tyre services integration is optional. It is worth pricing as a bundle if you already buy from Bridgestone, because that is where the discounting sits.
Related pages
More on Google Maps
Other head to heads
- Google Maps vs Ride with GPS
- Google Maps vs onX Maps
- Google Maps vs Citymapper
- Google Maps vs Transit
- Google Maps vs Trailforks
- Google Maps vs AllTrails
- Google Maps vs Mapbox
- Google Maps vs GRASS GIS
- Google Maps vs Geographic Calculator
- Google Maps vs Felt
- Google Maps vs Geoapify
- Google Maps vs Nominatim
- Google Maps vs Mapzen
- Google Maps vs Navmii GPS
- Google Maps vs OpenLayers
- Google Maps vs OpenRouteService
- Google Maps vs OpenStreetMap
- Google Maps vs Samsara
- Google Maps vs Geotab
- Google Maps vs Teletrac Navman
- Google Maps vs Lytx
- Google Maps vs Motive
- Google Maps vs Fleet Complete
- Google Maps vs Uptake
- Google Maps vs AssetWorks
- Google Maps vs Omnitracs
- Google Maps vs Chevin FleetWave
- Google Maps vs CalAmp
- Google Maps vs Whip Around
- Google Maps vs Ridecell
- Google Maps vs Zonar Systems
- Google Maps vs NexTraq
- Webfleet vs Ride with GPS
- Webfleet vs onX Maps
- Webfleet vs Citymapper
- Webfleet vs Transit
- Webfleet vs Trailforks
- Webfleet vs AllTrails
- Webfleet vs Mapbox
- Webfleet vs GRASS GIS
- Webfleet vs Geographic Calculator
- Webfleet vs Felt
- Webfleet vs Geoapify
- Webfleet vs Nominatim
- Webfleet vs Mapzen
- Webfleet vs Navmii GPS
- Webfleet vs OpenLayers
- Webfleet vs OpenRouteService
- Webfleet vs OpenStreetMap
- Webfleet vs Samsara
- Webfleet vs Geotab
- Webfleet vs Teletrac Navman
- Webfleet vs Lytx
- Webfleet vs Motive
- Webfleet vs Fleet Complete
- Webfleet vs Uptake
- Webfleet vs AssetWorks
- Webfleet vs Omnitracs
- Webfleet vs Chevin FleetWave
- Webfleet vs CalAmp
- Webfleet vs Whip Around
- Webfleet vs Ridecell
- Webfleet vs Zonar Systems
- Webfleet vs NexTraq
