Maps · head to head
Agisoft Metashape vs onX Maps

Agisoft Metashape
Maps
Desktop photogrammetry that turns photographs into point clouds, meshes, orthomosaics and DEMs
- From
- $179/one-time
- Rated
- -

onX Maps
Maps
Land ownership and offline navigation apps sold as separate subscriptions per activity: Hunt, Offroad, Backcountry
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Agisoft Metashape processing is entirely local, so throughput is a function of your workstation, and a large project on modest hardware can take days where a cloud service would return results overnight.; onX Maps hunt, Offroad and Backcountry are entirely separate subscriptions, so a user needing more than one activity pays for more than one product with no combined bundle discount.
- They diverge on capability: Agisoft Metashape covers Structure-from-motion alignment, onX Maps covers Land ownership boundaries.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Agisoft Metashape and onX Maps actually diverge.
| Attribute | Agisoft Metashape | onX Maps |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $179/one-time | On request |
| Pricing model | One-time purchase | Separate per-product subscriptions, per user per year |
| Platforms | Windows, macOS, Linux | iOS, Android, Web |
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Maps).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Agisoft Metashape
- Structure-from-motion alignment
- Dense point cloud generation
- Mesh and texture
- Orthomosaic and DEM
- Ground control points
- Point cloud classification
- Multispectral processing
- Python and Java scripting
Only in onX Maps
- Land ownership boundaries
- Offline maps
- Waypoint and track marking
- Elite tier private land data
- 3D terrain view
- Weather overlay
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Agisoft Metashape
- A survey or engineering firm processing high volumes of drone imagery that wants unlimited local processing instead of per-hectare cloud creditsnot onX Maps
- A quarry or mine measuring stockpile volumes monthly, where the same flight is reprocessed repeatedly and cloud pricing by area is punitivenot onX Maps
- An archaeology or heritage team documenting sites on a capital grant with no recurring software budget to renew a subscriptionnot onX Maps
- A VFX or games studio scanning props and environments, where Standard at $179 covers the whole requirement because georeferencing is irrelevantnot onX Maps
onX Maps
- A hunter who needs to know exact private and public land boundaries before crossing onto a propertynot Agisoft Metashape
- An off-road driver planning a trail route with land ownership and access datanot Agisoft Metashape
- A backcountry skier or hiker wanting offline terrain maps without cell signalnot Agisoft Metashape
- Someone who does two or more of these activities and needs to budget for two or three separate subscriptionsnot Agisoft Metashape
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Agisoft Metashape
- Processing is entirely local, so throughput is a function of your workstation, and a large project on modest hardware can take days where a cloud service would return results overnight.
- The vendor is a Russian company, and since 2022 payment is restricted to wire transfer, ACH and SEPA direct debit with no card payment, which some corporate and government procurement departments simply cannot process.
- There is no collaboration layer: no shared projects, no web viewer, no permissions. Sharing results means sending files, which is a real limitation on multi-office teams.
- Support is thin compared with commercial drone platforms, and the software assumes photogrammetric competence; users who do not understand overlap, ground control and residuals produce confidently wrong models.
- A node-locked licence is tied to a machine, and moving it or covering a second workstation means either a reseller-quoted floating licence or buying twice, which erodes the cost advantage for teams rather than individuals.
onX Maps
- Hunt, Offroad and Backcountry are entirely separate subscriptions, so a user needing more than one activity pays for more than one product with no combined bundle discount.
- Elite-tier pricing at roughly $99.99 a year per product is expensive if a buyer only occasionally needs the private land ownership data it adds.
- The apps are US and Canada focused, with more limited usefulness for international travel compared to a global mapping product.
- Land ownership data, while extensive, can lag real-world changes in property boundaries in fast-changing areas.
- It is not a general-purpose hiking or trail-review app in the way AllTrails or Gaia GPS are, so casual hikers without a land-boundary need may find the focus narrower than expected.
Pricing, plan by plan
Agisoft Metashape
$179/one-time- Standard$179/one-time
- Photogrammetric alignment, dense cloud, mesh and texture
- No georeferencing or coordinate systems
- No ground control points
- Professional$3499/one-time
- Everything in Standard
- Georeferencing, coordinate systems and ground control points
- Orthomosaic, DEM and point cloud classification
- Floating licence$undefined/one-time
- Shared across machines rather than node-locked
- Sold through authorised resellers only
- Quoted rather than listed
onX Maps
On request- onX Hunt Elite$99.99/year
- Nationwide private land ownership data
- Recent satellite imagery
- Offline maps
- onX Offroad Premium$34.99/year
- Trail and land ownership maps for off-road use
- Offline maps
- onX Offroad Elite$99.99/year
- Everything in Premium plus nationwide land ownership and recent imagery
- onX Backcountry$29.99/year
- Backcountry ski and hike focused maps
- Offline maps
- Avalanche and terrain data
Which should you pick?
Choose Agisoft Metashape if
- You need structure-from-motion alignment.
- You work on Windows, macOS, Linux.
- You also want dense point cloud generation.
Choose onX Maps if
- You need land ownership boundaries.
- You work on iOS, Android, Web.
- You also want offline maps.
Questions people ask
- Is Agisoft Metashape or onX Maps better?
- Neither clearly leads. Agisoft Metashape starts at $179/one-time and onX Maps at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Agisoft Metashape or onX Maps?
- Agisoft Metashape starts at $179/one-time and onX Maps at On request.
- Does Agisoft Metashape or onX Maps run on more platforms?
- Agisoft Metashape runs on Windows, macOS, Linux. onX Maps runs on iOS, Android, Web.
- What is Agisoft Metashape best used for?
- Agisoft Metashape is most often used for a survey or engineering firm processing high volumes of drone imagery that wants unlimited local processing instead of per-hectare cloud credits, a quarry or mine measuring stockpile volumes monthly, where the same flight is reprocessed repeatedly and cloud pricing by area is punitive, an archaeology or heritage team documenting sites on a capital grant with no recurring software budget to renew a subscription, a vfx or games studio scanning props and environments, where standard at $179 covers the whole requirement because georeferencing is irrelevant. Of those, a survey or engineering firm processing high volumes of drone imagery that wants unlimited local processing instead of per-hectare cloud credits and a quarry or mine measuring stockpile volumes monthly, where the same flight is reprocessed repeatedly and cloud pricing by area is punitive are not what onX Maps is typically brought in for.
- What can Agisoft Metashape do that onX Maps cannot?
- Agisoft Metashape covers Structure-from-motion alignment, Dense point cloud generation, Mesh and texture, Orthomosaic and DEM. onX Maps covers Land ownership boundaries, Offline maps, Waypoint and track marking, Elite tier private land data.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Agisoft Metashape: How much does Metashape cost?
Professional is $3,499 and Standard is $179, both node-locked. Floating licences are quoted through resellers.
onX Maps: Can I use one onX subscription for both hunting and off-roading?
No, onX Hunt, onX Offroad and onX Backcountry are separate apps with separate subscriptions.
Agisoft Metashape: Is it a subscription?
No. These are perpetual node-locked licences. Major version upgrades are charged separately.
onX Maps: What does the Elite tier add?
Elite tiers add nationwide private land ownership data, more recent satellite imagery and partner discounts on top of the base Premium tier.
Agisoft Metashape: What is the difference between Standard and Professional?
Standard has no georeferencing, coordinate systems, ground control points, orthomosaic export or scripting. Anything survey or mapping related requires Professional.
onX Maps: Does onX work outside the US?
Coverage is strongest in the US and Canada; usefulness elsewhere is limited.
Agisoft Metashape: Does it process in the cloud?
No. All processing is local on your own hardware, which is the main reason it is cheap at volume and slow on weak machines.
Agisoft Metashape: Are there educational licences?
Yes, Agisoft offers reduced academic pricing on a separate page.
Related pages
More on Agisoft Metashape
Other head to heads
- Agisoft Metashape vs QGIS
- Agisoft Metashape vs Correlator3D
- Agisoft Metashape vs Global Mapper
- Agisoft Metashape vs Cesium ion
- Agisoft Metashape vs Potree
- Agisoft Metashape vs Leica Infinity
- Agisoft Metashape vs Emlid Studio
- Agisoft Metashape vs SW Maps
- Agisoft Metashape vs Fused
- Agisoft Metashape vs Lonboard
- Agisoft Metashape vs Trailforks
- Agisoft Metashape vs Atlas.co
- Agisoft Metashape vs ArcGIS Field Maps
- Agisoft Metashape vs Felt
- Agisoft Metashape vs Geographic Calculator
- Agisoft Metashape vs Gaia GPS
- Agisoft Metashape vs AllTrails
- Agisoft Metashape vs Ride with GPS
- Agisoft Metashape vs Google Maps
- Agisoft Metashape vs Citymapper
- Agisoft Metashape vs Foursquare Spatial Studio
- Agisoft Metashape vs ArcGIS Survey123
- Agisoft Metashape vs Sygic GPS Navigation
- Agisoft Metashape vs TomTom
- Agisoft Metashape vs Transit
- Agisoft Metashape vs Waze
- Agisoft Metashape vs What3words
- Agisoft Metashape vs TomTom Developer Portal
- onX Maps vs QGIS
- onX Maps vs Correlator3D
- onX Maps vs Global Mapper
- onX Maps vs Cesium ion
- onX Maps vs Potree
- onX Maps vs Leica Infinity
- onX Maps vs Emlid Studio
- onX Maps vs SW Maps
- onX Maps vs Fused
- onX Maps vs Lonboard
- onX Maps vs Trailforks
- onX Maps vs Atlas.co
- onX Maps vs ArcGIS Field Maps
- onX Maps vs Felt
- onX Maps vs Geographic Calculator
- onX Maps vs Gaia GPS
- onX Maps vs AllTrails
- onX Maps vs Ride with GPS
- onX Maps vs Google Maps
- onX Maps vs Citymapper
- onX Maps vs Foursquare Spatial Studio
- onX Maps vs ArcGIS Survey123
- onX Maps vs Sygic GPS Navigation
- onX Maps vs TomTom
- onX Maps vs Transit
- onX Maps vs Waze
- onX Maps vs What3words
- onX Maps vs TomTom Developer Portal
