Fleet Management · head to head
NexTraq vs onX Maps

NexTraq
Fleet Management
US small-fleet telematics now absorbed into Michelin Connected Fleet
- From
- On request
- Free plan
- No

onX Maps
Maps
Land ownership and offline navigation apps sold as separate subscriptions per activity: Hunt, Offroad, Backcountry
- From
- On request
- Free plan
- No
The short version
- Each has a real cost: NexTraq the NexTraq brand has been absorbed into Michelin Connected Fleet, so the product name, the account team and eventually the platform underneath you are all subject to a consolidation plan you have no say in.; onX Maps hunt, Offroad and Backcountry are entirely separate subscriptions, so a user needing more than one activity pays for more than one product with no combined bundle discount.
- They diverge on capability: NexTraq covers Vehicle tracking, onX Maps covers Land ownership boundaries.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which NexTraq and onX Maps actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (On request), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in NexTraq
- Vehicle tracking
- Hours of service
- Fuel and idling reporting
- Maintenance scheduling
- Job dispatch
- Driver scorecards
Only in onX Maps
- Land ownership boundaries
- Offline maps
- Waypoint and track marking
- Elite tier private land data
- 3D terrain view
- Weather overlay
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
NexTraq
- A North American trades or field service fleet that wants tracking, dispatch and ELD compliance from one mid-market vendornot onX Maps
- An operator already buying Michelin tyres and fleet services that can negotiate telematics into a wider commercial agreementnot onX Maps
- A fleet replacing an ageing tracking system that values an owner with a large corporate balance sheet over a venture-funded challengernot onX Maps
- A distribution business needing straightforward fuel and idling reporting to justify a driver behaviour programmenot onX Maps
onX Maps
- A hunter who needs to know exact private and public land boundaries before crossing onto a propertynot NexTraq
- An off-road driver planning a trail route with land ownership and access datanot NexTraq
- A backcountry skier or hiker wanting offline terrain maps without cell signalnot NexTraq
- Someone who does two or more of these activities and needs to budget for two or three separate subscriptionsnot NexTraq
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
NexTraq
- The NexTraq brand has been absorbed into Michelin Connected Fleet, so the product name, the account team and eventually the platform underneath you are all subject to a consolidation plan you have no say in.
- Michelin is merging three separately engineered telematics products, which historically means feature freezes on the older platforms and a migration that existing customers pay for in disruption rather than cash.
- The feature set is mid-market and unexceptional, so it rarely wins a technical evaluation against Geotab or Samsara on capability alone.
- Contracts bundle hardware into multi-year terms, so a fleet that shrinks or is acquired continues paying for devices, and early exit triggers hardware recovery costs.
- The integration ecosystem is small and the API is not a selling point, so connecting telematics data to job costing or payroll usually means custom work or scheduled file exports.
onX Maps
- Hunt, Offroad and Backcountry are entirely separate subscriptions, so a user needing more than one activity pays for more than one product with no combined bundle discount.
- Elite-tier pricing at roughly $99.99 a year per product is expensive if a buyer only occasionally needs the private land ownership data it adds.
- The apps are US and Canada focused, with more limited usefulness for international travel compared to a global mapping product.
- Land ownership data, while extensive, can lag real-world changes in property boundaries in fast-changing areas.
- It is not a general-purpose hiking or trail-review app in the way AllTrails or Gaia GPS are, so casual hikers without a land-boundary need may find the focus narrower than expected.
Pricing, plan by plan
NexTraq
On request- NexTraq$undefined/year
- Per vehicle subscription with hardware bundled into the term
- Multi-year agreements are standard
- ELD and dispatch modules priced as tiers
onX Maps
On request- onX Hunt Elite$99.99/year
- Nationwide private land ownership data
- Recent satellite imagery
- Offline maps
- onX Offroad Premium$34.99/year
- Trail and land ownership maps for off-road use
- Offline maps
- onX Offroad Elite$99.99/year
- Everything in Premium plus nationwide land ownership and recent imagery
- onX Backcountry$29.99/year
- Backcountry ski and hike focused maps
- Offline maps
- Avalanche and terrain data
Which should you pick?
Choose NexTraq if
- You need vehicle tracking.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want hours of service.
Choose onX Maps if
- You need land ownership boundaries.
- You work on iOS, Android, Web.
- You also want offline maps.
Questions people ask
- Is NexTraq or onX Maps better?
- Neither clearly leads. NexTraq starts at On request and onX Maps at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, NexTraq or onX Maps?
- NexTraq starts at On request and onX Maps at On request.
- Does NexTraq or onX Maps run on more platforms?
- NexTraq runs on Web, iOS, Android. onX Maps runs on iOS, Android, Web.
- What is NexTraq best used for?
- NexTraq is most often used for a north american trades or field service fleet that wants tracking, dispatch and eld compliance from one mid-market vendor, an operator already buying michelin tyres and fleet services that can negotiate telematics into a wider commercial agreement, a fleet replacing an ageing tracking system that values an owner with a large corporate balance sheet over a venture-funded challenger, a distribution business needing straightforward fuel and idling reporting to justify a driver behaviour programme. Of those, a north american trades or field service fleet that wants tracking, dispatch and eld compliance from one mid-market vendor and an operator already buying michelin tyres and fleet services that can negotiate telematics into a wider commercial agreement are not what onX Maps is typically brought in for.
- What can NexTraq do that onX Maps cannot?
- NexTraq covers Vehicle tracking, Hours of service, Fuel and idling reporting, Maintenance scheduling. onX Maps covers Land ownership boundaries, Offline maps, Waypoint and track marking, Elite tier private land data.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
NexTraq: Is NexTraq still a separate company?
No. Michelin bought it in 2017 and has folded it into Michelin Connected Fleet, together with Masternaut in Europe and Sascar in Brazil.
onX Maps: Can I use one onX subscription for both hunting and off-roading?
No, onX Hunt, onX Offroad and onX Backcountry are separate apps with separate subscriptions.
NexTraq: Will my NexTraq system be migrated to a different platform?
Assume so, eventually. Ask directly what the migration timetable is, what happens to historical data, and who bears the cost of re-fitting or re-configuring devices.
onX Maps: What does the Elite tier add?
Elite tiers add nationwide private land ownership data, more recent satellite imagery and partner discounts on top of the base Premium tier.
NexTraq: Does buying Michelin tyres get me a better telematics price?
It is worth testing. The commercial logic of the acquisition is bundling vehicle services, and that is where discounting is most likely to be available.
onX Maps: Does onX work outside the US?
Coverage is strongest in the US and Canada; usefulness elsewhere is limited.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- NexTraq vs Geotab
- NexTraq vs Verizon Connect
- NexTraq vs Azuga
- NexTraq vs Samsara
- NexTraq vs Motive
- NexTraq vs GPS Trackit
- NexTraq vs Fleet Complete
- NexTraq vs Quartix
- NexTraq vs Zonar Systems
- NexTraq vs AssetWorks
- NexTraq vs Lytx
- NexTraq vs Ridecell
- NexTraq vs Uptake
- NexTraq vs Webfleet
- NexTraq vs Whip Around
- NexTraq vs Gaia GPS
- NexTraq vs Trailforks
- NexTraq vs AllTrails
- NexTraq vs Ride with GPS
- NexTraq vs Google Maps
- NexTraq vs Citymapper
- NexTraq vs Felt
- NexTraq vs SW Maps
- NexTraq vs Geographic Calculator
- NexTraq vs Foursquare Spatial Studio
- NexTraq vs ArcGIS Survey123
- NexTraq vs Agisoft Metashape
- NexTraq vs Sygic GPS Navigation
- NexTraq vs TomTom
- NexTraq vs Transit
- NexTraq vs Waze
- NexTraq vs What3words
- NexTraq vs TomTom Developer Portal
- onX Maps vs Geotab
- onX Maps vs Verizon Connect
- onX Maps vs Azuga
- onX Maps vs Samsara
- onX Maps vs Motive
- onX Maps vs GPS Trackit
- onX Maps vs Fleet Complete
- onX Maps vs Quartix
- onX Maps vs Zonar Systems
- onX Maps vs AssetWorks
- onX Maps vs Lytx
- onX Maps vs Ridecell
- onX Maps vs Uptake
- onX Maps vs Webfleet
- onX Maps vs Whip Around
- onX Maps vs Gaia GPS
- onX Maps vs Trailforks
- onX Maps vs AllTrails
- onX Maps vs Ride with GPS
- onX Maps vs Google Maps
- onX Maps vs Citymapper
- onX Maps vs Felt
- onX Maps vs SW Maps
- onX Maps vs Geographic Calculator
- onX Maps vs Foursquare Spatial Studio
- onX Maps vs ArcGIS Survey123
- onX Maps vs Agisoft Metashape
- onX Maps vs Sygic GPS Navigation
- onX Maps vs TomTom
- onX Maps vs Transit
- onX Maps vs Waze
- onX Maps vs What3words
- onX Maps vs TomTom Developer Portal
