Maps · head to head
Felt vs Webfleet

Felt
Maps
Collaborative browser mapping with a free non-commercial tier and annual-only paid contracts
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes

Webfleet
Fleet Management
European fleet telematics, owned by Bridgestone since the TomTom Telematics sale
- From
- On request
- Free plan
- No
The short version
- Only Felt has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Felt felt publishes no prices for Professional or Enterprise, so buyers cannot compare against ArcGIS Online or QGIS with hosting without entering a sales process; Webfleet ownership sits with a tyre manufacturer, so product investment follows the tyre and vehicle services strategy, and features that do not feed that business have historically moved slowly.
- They diverge on capability: Felt covers Real-time collaboration, Webfleet covers Tachograph management.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Felt and Webfleet actually diverge.
Identical on both: pricing model (quote), platforms (Web, iOS, Android), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Felt
- Real-time collaboration
- Drag and drop data
- Unlimited viewers
- Field app with offline support
- Dashboards
- Live cloud sources
- API and SDK
Only in Webfleet
- Tachograph management
- OptiDrive 360
- LINK devices
- PRO driver terminals
- Tyre and vehicle data
- Video telematics
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Felt
- An environmental consultancy that needs a client to view and comment on survey results without installing GIS softwarenot Webfleet
- A utility field crew collecting asset condition offline and syncing to the same map the office is looking atnot Webfleet
- A planning department sharing a proposal map with the public where the viewer count is unpredictable and viewer seats would be uncostednot Webfleet
- A team of analysts who each hold data in different formats and want one map assembled in an afternoon rather than a weeknot Webfleet
Webfleet
- A haulage operator running heavy goods vehicles across EU borders that must download tachograph data remotely and prove driving-time compliancenot Felt
- A European van fleet that wants driver coaching and fuel reporting without buying an American platform with unused compliance modulesnot Felt
- An organisation already buying Bridgestone tyres and maintenance that can fold telematics into an existing service contractnot Felt
- Fleets that want in-cab navigation and job dispatch on a dedicated driver terminal rather than a phone appnot Felt
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Felt
- Felt publishes no prices for Professional or Enterprise, so buyers cannot compare against ArcGIS Online or QGIS with hosting without entering a sales process
- Paid tiers are annual contract only with no monthly option, which excludes consultancies that need a tool for a single short engagement and forces them to the free non-commercial tier they are not licensed to use for client work
- The API, JavaScript SDK and live warehouse connections are enterprise-only, so a mid-sized team that wants programmatic access has to buy the top tier rather than pay for one capability
- Analytical depth is limited: there is no meaningful geoprocessing, topology checking or model building, so Felt sits beside a real GIS rather than replacing one
- The Professional tier caps data processing at 25 GB a month and map views at 100,000 a month, which are easy to exceed with raster imagery or a public-facing map, and the overage terms are not published either
Webfleet
- Ownership sits with a tyre manufacturer, so product investment follows the tyre and vehicle services strategy, and features that do not feed that business have historically moved slowly.
- North American coverage is thin next to the European operation, with a smaller partner network and an hours of service product that is not competitive with purpose-built ELD vendors.
- Useful compliance capability sits in add-on tiers, so remote tachograph download and advanced reporting push the real per vehicle cost well above the entry quote.
- The camera line arrived later than the market and offers less on-device detection and less coaching workflow than Lytx or Samsara, so safety-driven buyers often end up running a second system.
- Contracts are hardware-led and usually multi-year, so replacing Webfleet means either running out the term or writing off installed devices that have no resale value.
Pricing, plan by plan
Felt
Free- PersonalFree
- Free forever for non-commercial mapping
- Map creation, upload and sharing
- Not licensed for commercial use
- Professional$undefined/year
- 10 full-access seats with unlimited viewers
- 25 GB of data processing per month
- 100,000 map views per month
- Enterprise$undefined/year
- Live cloud sources including Postgres, Snowflake, BigQuery, Databricks and S3
- REST API and JavaScript SDK
- AI features
Webfleet
On request- Webfleet$undefined/year
- Per vehicle subscription in feature tiers
- Hardware bought outright or amortised over the term
- Tachograph and remote download sold as add-ons
Which should you pick?
Choose Felt if
- You need real-time collaboration.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want drag and drop data.
Choose Webfleet if
- You need tachograph management.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want optidrive 360.
Questions people ask
- Is Felt or Webfleet better?
- Neither clearly leads. Felt starts at Free and Webfleet at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Felt or Webfleet?
- Felt has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Felt and On request for Webfleet.
- Does Felt or Webfleet run on more platforms?
- Both run on Web, iOS, Android, so platform support will not decide this one for you.
- Can I use Felt for free?
- Yes. Felt has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Webfleet starts at On request.
- What is Felt best used for?
- Felt is most often used for an environmental consultancy that needs a client to view and comment on survey results without installing gis software, a utility field crew collecting asset condition offline and syncing to the same map the office is looking at, a planning department sharing a proposal map with the public where the viewer count is unpredictable and viewer seats would be uncosted, a team of analysts who each hold data in different formats and want one map assembled in an afternoon rather than a week. Of those, an environmental consultancy that needs a client to view and comment on survey results without installing gis software and a utility field crew collecting asset condition offline and syncing to the same map the office is looking at are not what Webfleet is typically brought in for.
- What can Felt do that Webfleet cannot?
- Felt covers Real-time collaboration, Drag and drop data, Unlimited viewers, Field app with offline support. Webfleet covers Tachograph management, OptiDrive 360, LINK devices, PRO driver terminals.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Felt: What does Felt cost?
Felt does not publish prices for Professional or Enterprise. Personal is free but licensed for non-commercial use only.
Webfleet: Is Webfleet still connected to TomTom?
No. TomTom sold the telematics business to Bridgestone in 2019. There is still navigation and mapping heritage in the driver terminals, but the owner and the strategy are Bridgestone.
Felt: Can I pay monthly?
No. Paid plans are annual contracts. There is a 7 day trial of Professional.
Webfleet: Can it handle US ELD requirements?
There is an offering, but it is not the strength of the platform. A fleet whose main problem is US hours of service compliance should look at vendors built around that mandate.
Felt: Do viewers cost anything?
No. Viewer access is unlimited on the paid plans, which is the main reason organisations with large map audiences choose it.
Webfleet: Do I have to buy Bridgestone tyres to use it?
No. The tyre services integration is optional. It is worth pricing as a bundle if you already buy from Bridgestone, because that is where the discounting sits.
Felt: Is there a nonprofit discount?
Yes, 30 per cent for verified United States nonprofits, and free access for verified students and classrooms.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Felt vs Esri ArcGIS
- Felt vs CARTO
- Felt vs QGIS
- Felt vs Atlas.co
- Felt vs Global Mapper
- Felt vs GRASS GIS
- Felt vs onX Maps
- Felt vs Ride with GPS
- Felt vs SW Maps
- Felt vs TomTom Developer Portal
- Felt vs Kepler.gl
- Felt vs Trailforks
- Felt vs AllTrails
- Felt vs Bing Maps
- Felt vs Cesium ion
- Felt vs Citymapper
- Felt vs ArcGIS Survey123
- Felt vs ArcGIS Field Maps
- Felt vs Samsara
- Felt vs Geotab
- Felt vs Teletrac Navman
- Felt vs Lytx
- Felt vs Motive
- Felt vs Fleet Complete
- Felt vs Uptake
- Felt vs AssetWorks
- Felt vs Omnitracs
- Felt vs Chevin FleetWave
- Felt vs CalAmp
- Felt vs Whip Around
- Felt vs Ridecell
- Felt vs Zonar Systems
- Felt vs NexTraq
- Webfleet vs Esri ArcGIS
- Webfleet vs CARTO
- Webfleet vs QGIS
- Webfleet vs Atlas.co
- Webfleet vs Global Mapper
- Webfleet vs GRASS GIS
- Webfleet vs onX Maps
- Webfleet vs Ride with GPS
- Webfleet vs SW Maps
- Webfleet vs TomTom Developer Portal
- Webfleet vs Kepler.gl
- Webfleet vs Trailforks
- Webfleet vs AllTrails
- Webfleet vs Bing Maps
- Webfleet vs Cesium ion
- Webfleet vs Citymapper
- Webfleet vs ArcGIS Survey123
- Webfleet vs ArcGIS Field Maps
- Webfleet vs Samsara
- Webfleet vs Geotab
- Webfleet vs Teletrac Navman
- Webfleet vs Lytx
- Webfleet vs Motive
- Webfleet vs Fleet Complete
- Webfleet vs Uptake
- Webfleet vs AssetWorks
- Webfleet vs Omnitracs
- Webfleet vs Chevin FleetWave
- Webfleet vs CalAmp
- Webfleet vs Whip Around
- Webfleet vs Ridecell
- Webfleet vs Zonar Systems
- Webfleet vs NexTraq
