Marketing · head to head
Invoca vs Onclusive

Invoca
Marketing
Call tracking and conversation analytics that ties inbound phone calls back to paid marketing spend
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Onclusive
Marketing
Media monitoring, journalist database and PR measurement assembled from six acquired companies
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Invoca entry pricing commonly starts around 1,500 US dollars a month before call minutes, plus a setup and training fee, which prices out agencies and small businesses that only need attribution for a few hundred calls.; Onclusive onclusive was assembled from at least six acquired companies inside about a year, and users still encounter different interfaces, inconsistent data definitions and separate support paths depending on which module they are in, so training and internal reporting are harder than a single-product vendor.
- They diverge on capability: Invoca covers Dynamic number insertion, Onclusive covers Global media monitoring.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Invoca and Onclusive actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (On request), pricing model (quote), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Marketing).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Invoca
- Dynamic number insertion
- Signal AI
- Ad platform integration
- Call transcription
- PreSense
- Call routing
- Quality management
- Compliance redaction
Only in Onclusive
- Global media monitoring
- Broadcast monitoring
- Social listening
- Media contacts database
- Newsroom and press office
- Sentiment and tone analysis
- Share of voice reporting
- Crisis detection
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Invoca
- A multi-location healthcare group proving which paid search keywords produce booked appointments rather than just call volumenot Onclusive
- An insurance carrier feeding qualified call outcomes back into Google Ads so bidding optimises on written policies instead of raw callsnot Onclusive
- An automotive dealer group working out which regional campaigns generate service bookings versus tyre-kicker enquiriesnot Onclusive
- A home services franchisor allocating budget across franchisees by attributing revenue-producing calls to the campaigns that caused themnot Onclusive
Onclusive
- A multinational communications team that needs print, broadcast and online coverage across twenty markets reported in one dashboard rather than through three regional vendorsnot Invoca
- A public affairs team that must evidence share of voice against named competitors for a quarterly board reportnot Invoca
- A PR agency running press office and media enquiry workflow for several client brands from one systemnot Invoca
- A corporate affairs function that needs early warning on a coverage spike outside its own time zone, with broadcast clips retrievable for legal reviewnot Invoca
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Invoca
- Entry pricing commonly starts around 1,500 US dollars a month before call minutes, plus a setup and training fee, which prices out agencies and small businesses that only need attribution for a few hundred calls.
- Telephony minutes and tracking numbers are metered separately from the platform fee, so a seasonal advertising spike produces an invoice nobody forecast.
- Signal AI, PreSense and quality management are frequently sold as add-on modules rather than included, meaning the demo you were shown may cost noticeably more than the quote you were given.
- Contracts are annual or multi-year with usage minimums and no month-to-month option, so a campaign strategy that shifts away from phone calls leaves you paying for capacity you no longer use.
- The product is deep on inbound phone attribution and shallow elsewhere; if your buying journey also involves chat, forms and in-store visits, Invoca covers only one channel and you still need a separate attribution model for the rest.
Onclusive
- Onclusive was assembled from at least six acquired companies inside about a year, and users still encounter different interfaces, inconsistent data definitions and separate support paths depending on which module they are in, so training and internal reporting are harder than a single-product vendor.
- Pricing is not published and is scoped by market coverage, source count and user seats, which makes competitive benchmarking difficult and means renewal increases are hard to challenge without a parallel quote from Cision or Meltwater.
- Broadcast monitoring coverage is uneven by country, so a global contract can look complete on paper while a specific market you care about has thin local radio or regional television coverage; verify your priority markets by name before signing.
- The company carries private-equity ownership and acquisition-related debt financing, which historically in this category has meant pressure on support headcount and above-inflation renewal pricing rather than product investment.
- Automated sentiment classification on news copy remains error-prone, especially for irony, quoted criticism and industry jargon, so teams reporting sentiment to executives generally need a human review step that erodes the labour saving the tool was bought for.
Pricing, plan by plan
Invoca
On request- Pro$undefined/year
- Around 6,000 annual local or toll-free numbers
- 5 custom Signals
- Dynamic number insertion
- Enterprise$undefined/year
- Around 12,000 annual numbers
- 50 custom Signals
- Advanced routing
- Elite$undefined/year
- Around 18,000 annual numbers
- 100 custom Signals
- Full analytics suite
- Performance Professional$undefined/year
- Pay-per-call network features
- Publisher and affiliate call tracking
- Payout management
Onclusive
On request- Onclusive$undefined/year
- Global media monitoring
- Broadcast and print coverage
- Onclusive Social listening
Which should you pick?
Choose Onclusive if
- You need global media monitoring.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android, API.
- You also want broadcast monitoring.
Questions people ask
- Is Invoca or Onclusive better?
- Neither clearly leads. Invoca starts at On request and Onclusive at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Invoca or Onclusive?
- Invoca starts at On request and Onclusive at On request.
- Does Invoca or Onclusive run on more platforms?
- Invoca runs on Web. Onclusive runs on Web, iOS, Android, API.
- What is Invoca best used for?
- Invoca is most often used for a multi-location healthcare group proving which paid search keywords produce booked appointments rather than just call volume, an insurance carrier feeding qualified call outcomes back into google ads so bidding optimises on written policies instead of raw calls, an automotive dealer group working out which regional campaigns generate service bookings versus tyre-kicker enquiries, a home services franchisor allocating budget across franchisees by attributing revenue-producing calls to the campaigns that caused them. Of those, a multi-location healthcare group proving which paid search keywords produce booked appointments rather than just call volume and an insurance carrier feeding qualified call outcomes back into google ads so bidding optimises on written policies instead of raw calls are not what Onclusive is typically brought in for.
- What can Invoca do that Onclusive cannot?
- Invoca covers Dynamic number insertion, Signal AI, Ad platform integration, Call transcription. Onclusive covers Global media monitoring, Broadcast monitoring, Social listening, Media contacts database.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Invoca: Does Invoca publish prices?
No. Every deal is quoted from call volume, number count and which modules you licence. Independent reports put the entry point near 1,500 US dollars a month plus minutes.
Onclusive: Is Onclusive one product or several?
Several. It was formed from Kantar Reputation Intelligence, PRgloo and the original Onclusive in January 2022, then absorbed Critical Mention and Digimind later that year, and the modules retain distinguishable lineages.
Invoca: Is this different from CallRail?
Yes, in ambition and price. Invoca targets enterprise attribution with automated outcome classification fed back to ad bidding; lighter call tracking tools stop at source attribution.
Onclusive: Who owns it?
Symphony Technology Group, a US private equity firm, with debt financing on the Critical Mention acquisition from Stellus Capital Management.
Invoca: Is it HIPAA compatible?
Invoca sells heavily into healthcare and offers redaction and compliance controls for regulated recordings; confirm the specific terms in your contract.
Onclusive: What happened to Digimind?
Digimind was acquired in July 2022 and rebranded as Onclusive Social in October 2022. If social listening is your main requirement, that is the platform you are evaluating.
Invoca: Do we need a contact centre platform as well?
Yes. Invoca tracks and analyses calls, it does not run your contact centre.
Onclusive: Does it publish pricing?
No. Contracts are annual and quoted according to markets monitored, sources covered and seat count.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Invoca vs CallRail
- Invoca vs Ruler Analytics
- Invoca vs Northbeam
- Invoca vs Attribution
- Invoca vs Dreamdata
- Invoca vs Madgicx
- Invoca vs Marketing Evolution
- Invoca vs Triple Whale
- Invoca vs Freshpaint
- Invoca vs Moz
- Invoca vs Postscript
- Invoca vs Roxhill
- Invoca vs Netcore Cloud
- Invoca vs Octoboard
- Invoca vs Optimove
- Invoca vs Postmark
- Invoca vs Buffer
- Invoca vs Hootsuite
- Invoca vs Bloomreach
- Invoca vs Umami
- Invoca vs VWO
- Invoca vs MoEngage
- Invoca vs Zoho Marketing Automation
- Invoca vs Adverity
- Invoca vs Whatagraph
- Invoca vs Optimizely
- Invoca vs Vimeo
- Invoca vs Countly
- Onclusive vs CallRail
- Onclusive vs Ruler Analytics
- Onclusive vs Northbeam
- Onclusive vs Attribution
- Onclusive vs Dreamdata
- Onclusive vs Madgicx
- Onclusive vs Marketing Evolution
- Onclusive vs Triple Whale
- Onclusive vs Freshpaint
- Onclusive vs Moz
- Onclusive vs Postscript
- Onclusive vs Roxhill
- Onclusive vs Netcore Cloud
- Onclusive vs Octoboard
- Onclusive vs Optimove
- Onclusive vs Postmark
- Onclusive vs Buffer
- Onclusive vs Hootsuite
- Onclusive vs Bloomreach
- Onclusive vs Umami
- Onclusive vs VWO
- Onclusive vs MoEngage
- Onclusive vs Zoho Marketing Automation
- Onclusive vs Adverity
- Onclusive vs Whatagraph
- Onclusive vs Optimizely
- Onclusive vs Vimeo
- Onclusive vs Countly
