Marketing · head to head
Onclusive vs Postmark

Onclusive
Marketing
Media monitoring, journalist database and PR measurement assembled from six acquired companies
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Postmark
Marketing
No hidden fees, no guesswork. Just the features you need, at a price that makes sense
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Onclusive onclusive was assembled from at least six acquired companies inside about a year, and users still encounter different interfaces, inconsistent data definitions and separate support paths depending on which module they are in, so training and internal reporting are harder than a single-product vendor.; Postmark free tier caps at 100 emails per month with no overages allowed
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Onclusive and Postmark actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (On request), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Marketing).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Onclusive
- Global media monitoring
- Broadcast monitoring
- Social listening
- Media contacts database
- Newsroom and press office
- Sentiment and tone analysis
- Share of voice reporting
- Crisis detection
Only in Postmark
Nothing recorded that Onclusive does not also cover.
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Onclusive
- A multinational communications team that needs print, broadcast and online coverage across twenty markets reported in one dashboard rather than through three regional vendorsnot Postmark
- A public affairs team that must evidence share of voice against named competitors for a quarterly board reportnot Postmark
- A PR agency running press office and media enquiry workflow for several client brands from one systemnot Postmark
- A corporate affairs function that needs early warning on a coverage spike outside its own time zone, with broadcast clips retrievable for legal reviewnot Postmark
Postmark
- Sending password reset emails with industry-leading delivery speednot Onclusive
- Processing inbound email replies into JSON objects for applicationsnot Onclusive
- Tracking failed email deliveries and suppressing invalid addressesnot Onclusive
- Separating transactional emails from marketing emails with message streamsnot Onclusive
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Onclusive
- Onclusive was assembled from at least six acquired companies inside about a year, and users still encounter different interfaces, inconsistent data definitions and separate support paths depending on which module they are in, so training and internal reporting are harder than a single-product vendor.
- Pricing is not published and is scoped by market coverage, source count and user seats, which makes competitive benchmarking difficult and means renewal increases are hard to challenge without a parallel quote from Cision or Meltwater.
- Broadcast monitoring coverage is uneven by country, so a global contract can look complete on paper while a specific market you care about has thin local radio or regional television coverage; verify your priority markets by name before signing.
- The company carries private-equity ownership and acquisition-related debt financing, which historically in this category has meant pressure on support headcount and above-inflation renewal pricing rather than product investment.
- Automated sentiment classification on news copy remains error-prone, especially for irony, quoted criticism and industry jargon, so teams reporting sentiment to executives generally need a human review step that erodes the labour saving the tool was bought for.
Postmark
- Free tier caps at 100 emails per month with no overages allowed
- Basic plan ($15/mo) includes 10,000 emails then charges $1.80 per 1,000 extra; Pro and Platform tiers have their own lower per-1,000 overage rates ($1.30 and $1.20), so cost scales per email beyond the included volume
- Custom high-volume pricing above the published tiers requires contacting sales
Pricing, plan by plan
Onclusive
On request- Onclusive$undefined/year
- Global media monitoring
- Broadcast and print coverage
- Onclusive Social listening
Postmark
On requestNo published plan breakdown. See the Postmark review.
Which should you pick?
Choose Onclusive if
- You need global media monitoring.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android, API.
- You also want broadcast monitoring.
Choose Postmark if
Nothing in the data separates Postmark from Onclusive on the points above - pick on price and on how each one feels to use.
Questions people ask
- Is Onclusive or Postmark better?
- Neither clearly leads. Onclusive starts at On request and Postmark at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Onclusive or Postmark?
- Onclusive starts at On request and Postmark at On request.
- Does Onclusive or Postmark run on more platforms?
- Onclusive runs on Web, iOS, Android, API. Postmark runs on Web.
- What is Onclusive best used for?
- Onclusive is most often used for a multinational communications team that needs print, broadcast and online coverage across twenty markets reported in one dashboard rather than through three regional vendors, a public affairs team that must evidence share of voice against named competitors for a quarterly board report, a pr agency running press office and media enquiry workflow for several client brands from one system, a corporate affairs function that needs early warning on a coverage spike outside its own time zone, with broadcast clips retrievable for legal review. Of those, a multinational communications team that needs print, broadcast and online coverage across twenty markets reported in one dashboard rather than through three regional vendors and a public affairs team that must evidence share of voice against named competitors for a quarterly board report are not what Postmark is typically brought in for.
- What can Onclusive do that Postmark cannot?
- Onclusive covers Global media monitoring, Broadcast monitoring, Social listening, Media contacts database.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Onclusive: Is Onclusive one product or several?
Several. It was formed from Kantar Reputation Intelligence, PRgloo and the original Onclusive in January 2022, then absorbed Critical Mention and Digimind later that year, and the modules retain distinguishable lineages.
Postmark: What is the cheapest paid plan for Postmark email sending?
Postmark Basic plan is $15/month for 10,000 emails, with overages at $1.80 per 1,000 additional emails. Free tier limited to 100/month. No annual billing discount available. Source: https://www.postmarkapp.com/pricing
SourceOnclusive: Who owns it?
Symphony Technology Group, a US private equity firm, with debt financing on the Critical Mention acquisition from Stellus Capital Management.
Postmark: How are Postmark email overages calculated?
Overages are calculated at month-end and billed with your next plan cost. Basic tier overages: $1.80 per 1,000; Pro: $1.30 per 1,000; Platform: $1.20 per 1,000. Unused monthly emails do not carry over. Source: https://www.postmarkapp.com/pricing
SourceOnclusive: What happened to Digimind?
Digimind was acquired in July 2022 and rebranded as Onclusive Social in October 2022. If social listening is your main requirement, that is the platform you are evaluating.
Postmark: What payment methods does Postmark accept?
Postmark accepts Visa, MasterCard, American Express, Diners Club, and JCB. No PayPal or purchase orders accepted. Bootstrapped startups can request a $75 account credit. Source: https://www.postmarkapp.com/pricing
SourceOnclusive: Does it publish pricing?
No. Contracts are annual and quoted according to markets monitored, sources covered and seat count.
Postmark: Can I get a dedicated IP on Postmark without high volume?
No. Postmark dedicated IPs require minimum 300,000 emails per month and start at $50/month. Alternative: use Postmark's shared infrastructure included in all tiers. Source: https://www.postmarkapp.com/pricing
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Onclusive vs Roxhill
- Onclusive vs Northbeam
- Onclusive vs Buffer
- Onclusive vs Hootsuite
- Onclusive vs Bloomreach
- Onclusive vs Freshpaint
- Onclusive vs Umami
- Onclusive vs VWO
- Onclusive vs Moz
- Onclusive vs MoEngage
- Onclusive vs Zoho Marketing Automation
- Onclusive vs Adverity
- Onclusive vs Whatagraph
- Onclusive vs Optimizely
- Onclusive vs Vimeo
- Onclusive vs Attribution
- Onclusive vs Countly
- Onclusive vs Wrike
- Onclusive vs Mailgun
- Onclusive vs Wunderkind
- Onclusive vs Netcore Cloud
- Onclusive vs Optimove
- Onclusive vs Postscript
- Onclusive vs Iterable
- Onclusive vs Customer.io
- Onclusive vs Google Analytics
- Onclusive vs Triple Whale
- Onclusive vs Adobe Analytics
- Postmark vs Roxhill
- Postmark vs Northbeam
- Postmark vs Buffer
- Postmark vs Hootsuite
- Postmark vs Bloomreach
- Postmark vs Freshpaint
- Postmark vs Umami
- Postmark vs VWO
- Postmark vs Moz
- Postmark vs MoEngage
- Postmark vs Zoho Marketing Automation
- Postmark vs Adverity
- Postmark vs Whatagraph
- Postmark vs Optimizely
- Postmark vs Vimeo
- Postmark vs Attribution
- Postmark vs Countly
- Postmark vs Wrike
- Postmark vs Mailgun
- Postmark vs Wunderkind
- Postmark vs Netcore Cloud
- Postmark vs Optimove
- Postmark vs Postscript
- Postmark vs Iterable
- Postmark vs Customer.io
- Postmark vs Google Analytics
- Postmark vs Triple Whale
- Postmark vs Adobe Analytics
