News · head to head
Muck Rack vs Roxhill

Roxhill
Marketing
UK-focused journalist database and media monitoring, founder-owned and annual only
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Muck Rack no specific prices published; all pricing is based on customized proposals based on team size and user count; Roxhill the database is UK-centric by reviewers’ own account, with weak US, Australian and broader Asian journalist coverage, so any multi-market programme needs a second vendor and the single-vendor cost case disappears.
- They diverge on capability: Muck Rack covers Media database, Roxhill covers Journalist database.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Muck Rack and Roxhill actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (On request), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Muck Rack
- Media database
- Pitching platform
- Coverage reporting
- Slack
- Salesforce
- Google Analytics
- CRM systems
- Web support
Only in Roxhill
- Journalist database
- Media lists and distribution
- Media requests and alerts
- Bespoke newsletters
- Historical search
- Journalist Assistant
Both cover
- Journalist profiles
- Media monitoring
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Muck Rack
- Finding and pitching journalists from a media databasenot Roxhill
- Monitoring coverage and measuring PR resultsnot Roxhill
Roxhill
- A UK in-house press office that needs journalist contacts with current pitching preferences rather than a scraped byline list.not Muck Rack
- An agency tracking forward features across UK trade and consumer titles to place clients into planned coverage months ahead.not Muck Rack
- A communications team monitoring named spokespeople and measuring their share of voice against competitors in UK media.not Muck Rack
- A UK public sector body procuring through G-Cloud that needs EEA-hosted media monitoring with a published framework price band.not Muck Rack
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Muck Rack
- No specific prices published; all pricing is based on customized proposals based on team size and user count
- Starter plan has limited features compared to Standard and Premier (no podcast monitoring or curation engine)
- Sentiment analysis on Starter uses basic NLP, while Premier uses AI-powered analysis
Roxhill
- The database is UK-centric by reviewers’ own account, with weak US, Australian and broader Asian journalist coverage, so any multi-market programme needs a second vendor and the single-vendor cost case disappears.
- Contact records go stale: reviewers report old email addresses and phone numbers, distribution bounces, and there is no self-serve verification step before you send.
- At roughly 200,000 to 300,000 journalists it is far smaller than the million-plus figures Cision and Prowly claim, with repeated complaints about thin trade, academic and journal coverage.
- Selling is annual only with no monthly plan and a trial functionally restricted to around two weeks, so you cannot genuinely pilot before a twelve-month commitment, which is a poor fit for project or retainer agency work.
- Licence bands are 1, 3 and 5 seats, and extra logins, workspaces, smart folders, historical search, share of voice and the spokespeople platform are all chargeable add-ons, so a team of eight to fifteen pays well above any headline band.
- Search behaviour is described as counter-intuitive and sometimes returns implausibly few results, which means a null result cannot be trusted and lists need manual cross-checking.
- Monitoring accuracy takes time to settle after switching, so coverage is missed in the first weeks after a cutover, which is a real gap risk if you time the migration badly.
Pricing, plan by plan
Muck Rack
On request- ProFree
- Media database
- Media monitoring
- Pitching tools
- EnterpriseFree
- All Pro features
- Team management
- SSO integration
Roxhill
On request- Core$undefined/year
- 1 licence
- Standard database access
- Journalist Assistant
- Boutique$undefined/year
- 3 licences
- Adds press release distribution
- 3 workspaces, 6 smart folders, 10 spokespeople, 3 newsletters
- Enterprise$undefined/year
- 5 licences
- 5 workspaces, 10 smart folders, 5 newsletters
- Spokespeople platform
- Premium$undefined/year
- Everything in Enterprise
- Insights analysis and bespoke reporting
- Competitor share of voice
Which should you pick?
Choose Muck Rack if
- You need media database.
- You work on Web, Browser-extension.
- You also want pitching platform.
Choose Roxhill if
- You need journalist database.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want media lists and distribution.
Questions people ask
- Is Muck Rack or Roxhill better?
- Neither clearly leads. Muck Rack starts at On request and Roxhill at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Muck Rack or Roxhill?
- Muck Rack starts at On request and Roxhill at On request.
- Does Muck Rack or Roxhill run on more platforms?
- Muck Rack runs on Web, Browser-extension. Roxhill runs on Web, iOS, Android.
- What is Muck Rack best used for?
- Muck Rack is most often used for finding and pitching journalists from a media database, monitoring coverage and measuring pr results. Of those, finding and pitching journalists from a media database and monitoring coverage and measuring pr results are not what Roxhill is typically brought in for.
- What can Muck Rack do that Roxhill cannot?
- Muck Rack covers Media database, Pitching platform, Coverage reporting, Slack. Roxhill covers Journalist database, Media lists and distribution, Media requests and alerts, Bespoke newsletters. Both handle Journalist profiles, Media monitoring.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Muck Rack: How are Muck Rack plans priced?
Muck Rack pricing is not published. The platform offers three tiers (Starter, Standard, and Premier) with customized pricing that depends on several factors including team size and number of users. Interested customers must contact sales for a personalized quote.
SourceRoxhill: How much does Roxhill cost?
Not published on the vendor site, but the UK G-Cloud 14 listing discloses £6,450 to £25,000 per instance per year. Use that as your anchor.
Muck Rack: What features does Muck Rack Standard plan include?
Muck Rack Standard includes media monitoring and alerts, podcast monitoring, AI visibility badges, AI journalist recommendations, full media list exports, and NLP-based sentiment analysis. It is marked as the most popular plan on their pricing page.
SourceRoxhill: Is Roxhill owned by Cision or Access Intelligence?
No. Companies House shows a single individual holding over 75% of shares and no corporate PSC. It is founder-controlled and unfunded. Note the founder previously sold Gorkana to Cision, so ask for a change-of-control clause.
Muck Rack: What is unique about Muck Rack Premier plan?
Muck Rack Premier is the highest tier and adds the Curation Engine and AI-powered sentiment analysis (versus basic NLP). It includes Muck Rack API access and is targeted at enterprises and advanced teams.
SourceRoxhill: Is it usable for US or APAC media relations?
Not well. Reviewers describe US, Australian and Asian coverage as materially weaker than UK. Budget for a second database.
Muck Rack: What add-ons are available for Muck Rack?
Muck Rack offers multiple add-ons with pricing not specified: Print and Broadcast Monitoring, Social Listening, Press Release Distribution, Muck Rack API (Premier tier), Media Intelligence Services, and Generative Pulse.
SourceRoxhill: Can I buy monthly?
No. Contracts are annual, sales-gated, with a trial of around two weeks.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Muck Rack vs Feedly
- Muck Rack vs Beehiiv
- Muck Rack vs Inoreader
- Muck Rack vs Chartbeat
- Muck Rack vs Cision
- Muck Rack vs Agility PR Solutions
- Muck Rack vs Prowly
- Muck Rack vs Meltwater
- Muck Rack vs Steno
- Muck Rack vs Arc Publishing
- Muck Rack vs Brightspot
- Muck Rack vs Business Wire
- Muck Rack vs Flipboard
- Muck Rack vs Ghost
- Muck Rack vs Google News
- Muck Rack vs NetNewsWire
- Muck Rack vs Ghost CMS
- Muck Rack vs Onclusive
- Muck Rack vs Northbeam
- Muck Rack vs Ahrefs
- Muck Rack vs CleverTap
- Muck Rack vs Invoca
- Muck Rack vs Optimove
- Muck Rack vs Swydo
- Muck Rack vs WebEngage
- Muck Rack vs Wunderkind
- Muck Rack vs Buffer
- Muck Rack vs Hootsuite
- Muck Rack vs Moz
- Muck Rack vs Google Optimize
- Muck Rack vs Improvado
- Muck Rack vs Insider
- Muck Rack vs Instapage
- Muck Rack vs June
- Roxhill vs Feedly
- Roxhill vs Beehiiv
- Roxhill vs Inoreader
- Roxhill vs Chartbeat
- Roxhill vs Cision
- Roxhill vs Agility PR Solutions
- Roxhill vs Prowly
- Roxhill vs Meltwater
- Roxhill vs Steno
- Roxhill vs Arc Publishing
- Roxhill vs Brightspot
- Roxhill vs Business Wire
- Roxhill vs Flipboard
- Roxhill vs Ghost
- Roxhill vs Google News
- Roxhill vs NetNewsWire
- Roxhill vs Ghost CMS
- Roxhill vs Onclusive
- Roxhill vs Northbeam
- Roxhill vs Ahrefs
- Roxhill vs CleverTap
- Roxhill vs Invoca
- Roxhill vs Optimove
- Roxhill vs Swydo
- Roxhill vs WebEngage
- Roxhill vs Wunderkind
- Roxhill vs Buffer
- Roxhill vs Hootsuite
- Roxhill vs Moz
- Roxhill vs Google Optimize
- Roxhill vs Improvado
- Roxhill vs Insider
- Roxhill vs Instapage
- Roxhill vs June

