Marketing · head to head
Northbeam vs Roxhill

Roxhill
Marketing
UK-focused journalist database and media monitoring, founder-owned and annual only
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Northbeam limited creative-level reporting focused on campaign and ad set rather than individual ad performance; Roxhill the database is UK-centric by reviewers’ own account, with weak US, Australian and broader Asian journalist coverage, so any multi-market programme needs a second vendor and the single-vendor cost case disappears.
- They diverge on capability: Northbeam covers Cross-platform attribution, Roxhill covers Journalist database.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Northbeam and Roxhill actually diverge.
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Marketing).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Northbeam
- Cross-platform attribution
- Media mix modeling
- Creative analytics
- Real-time dashboards
- Incrementality testing
- Customer journey
- Cohort analysis
- LTV predictions
Only in Roxhill
- Journalist database
- Journalist profiles
- Media lists and distribution
- Media requests and alerts
- Media monitoring
- Bespoke newsletters
- Historical search
- Journalist Assistant
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Northbeam
- Marketing attributionnot Roxhill
- Media optimizationnot Roxhill
- Creative testingnot Roxhill
- Budget allocationnot Roxhill
Roxhill
- A UK in-house press office that needs journalist contacts with current pitching preferences rather than a scraped byline list.not Northbeam
- An agency tracking forward features across UK trade and consumer titles to place clients into planned coverage months ahead.not Northbeam
- A communications team monitoring named spokespeople and measuring their share of voice against competitors in UK media.not Northbeam
- A UK public sector body procuring through G-Cloud that needs EEA-hosted media monitoring with a published framework price band.not Northbeam
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Northbeam
- Limited creative-level reporting focused on campaign and ad set rather than individual ad performance
- Lack of transparency in attribution modeling methodology and how credit is assigned
- Pageview-based pricing that can scale faster than perceived value for high-traffic, lower-conversion brands
- Slower reporting cadence limits real-time feedback for teams requiring immediate performance data
Roxhill
- The database is UK-centric by reviewers’ own account, with weak US, Australian and broader Asian journalist coverage, so any multi-market programme needs a second vendor and the single-vendor cost case disappears.
- Contact records go stale: reviewers report old email addresses and phone numbers, distribution bounces, and there is no self-serve verification step before you send.
- At roughly 200,000 to 300,000 journalists it is far smaller than the million-plus figures Cision and Prowly claim, with repeated complaints about thin trade, academic and journal coverage.
- Selling is annual only with no monthly plan and a trial functionally restricted to around two weeks, so you cannot genuinely pilot before a twelve-month commitment, which is a poor fit for project or retainer agency work.
- Licence bands are 1, 3 and 5 seats, and extra logins, workspaces, smart folders, historical search, share of voice and the spokespeople platform are all chargeable add-ons, so a team of eight to fifteen pays well above any headline band.
- Search behaviour is described as counter-intuitive and sometimes returns implausibly few results, which means a null result cannot be trusted and lists need manual cross-checking.
- Monitoring accuracy takes time to settle after switching, so coverage is missed in the first weeks after a cutover, which is a real gap risk if you time the migration badly.
Pricing, plan by plan
Northbeam
$1500/month- Starter$1500/month
- Multi-touch attribution
- Media mix modeling
- Up to 1M monthly pageviews
- Professional$2500/month
- All Starter features
- Creative analytics
- Export API access
Roxhill
On request- Core$undefined/year
- 1 licence
- Standard database access
- Journalist Assistant
- Boutique$undefined/year
- 3 licences
- Adds press release distribution
- 3 workspaces, 6 smart folders, 10 spokespeople, 3 newsletters
- Enterprise$undefined/year
- 5 licences
- 5 workspaces, 10 smart folders, 5 newsletters
- Spokespeople platform
- Premium$undefined/year
- Everything in Enterprise
- Insights analysis and bespoke reporting
- Competitor share of voice
Which should you pick?
Choose Northbeam if
- You need cross-platform attribution.
- You work on Web, API.
- You also want media mix modeling.
Choose Roxhill if
- You need journalist database.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want journalist profiles.
Questions people ask
- Is Northbeam or Roxhill better?
- Neither clearly leads. Northbeam starts at $1500/month and Roxhill at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Northbeam or Roxhill?
- Northbeam starts at $1500/month and Roxhill at On request.
- Does Northbeam or Roxhill run on more platforms?
- Northbeam runs on Web, API. Roxhill runs on Web, iOS, Android.
- What is Northbeam best used for?
- Northbeam is most often used for marketing attribution, media optimization, creative testing, budget allocation. Of those, marketing attribution and media optimization are not what Roxhill is typically brought in for.
- What can Northbeam do that Roxhill cannot?
- Northbeam covers Cross-platform attribution, Media mix modeling, Creative analytics, Real-time dashboards. Roxhill covers Journalist database, Journalist profiles, Media lists and distribution, Media requests and alerts.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Northbeam: How is Northbeam priced?
Northbeam offers three tiers: Starter ($1,500/month), Professional ($2,500/month), and Enterprise (custom quote). Pricing is based on monthly pageviews and refreshed data frequency. There are no setup fees, free plan, or free trial.
SourceRoxhill: How much does Roxhill cost?
Not published on the vendor site, but the UK G-Cloud 14 listing discloses £6,450 to £25,000 per instance per year. Use that as your anchor.
Northbeam: What platforms does Northbeam integrate with?
Northbeam integrates with Shopify, Meta Ads, Google Ads, TikTok, Pinterest, Snapchat, YouTube, Klaviyo, Recharge, and others. It pushes attribution data to Meta CAPI, Google Conversion API, GA4, and TikTok Events API.
SourceRoxhill: Is Roxhill owned by Cision or Access Intelligence?
No. Companies House shows a single individual holding over 75% of shares and no corporate PSC. It is founder-controlled and unfunded. Note the founder previously sold Gorkana to Cision, so ask for a change-of-control clause.
Northbeam: What does Northbeam measure?
Northbeam uses multi-touch attribution (MTA), media mix modeling (MMM), and Northbeam Apex to measure how paid media spend translates to revenue. Apex sends attribution data directly back to ad platforms for algorithm optimization.
SourceRoxhill: Is it usable for US or APAC media relations?
Not well. Reviewers describe US, Australian and Asian coverage as materially weaker than UK. Budget for a second database.
Northbeam: Who should use Northbeam?
Northbeam is ideal for intermediate to advanced ecommerce operators at Shopify-based DTC brands generating $1M+ annual revenue and spending at least $1.5M yearly on paid media across multiple channels.
SourceRoxhill: Can I buy monthly?
No. Contracts are annual, sales-gated, with a trial of around two weeks.
Northbeam: What are Northbeam's main limitations?
Key limitations include a steep learning curve and complex interface, shallow creative-level reporting, lack of model transparency, pricing that can scale faster than value for high-traffic brands, and slower reporting cadence compared to real-time dashboards.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Northbeam vs Triple Whale
- Northbeam vs Attribution
- Northbeam vs Marketing Evolution
- Northbeam vs Ruler Analytics
- Northbeam vs Adobe Analytics
- Northbeam vs Adverity
- Northbeam vs Kissmetrics
- Northbeam vs Woopra
- Northbeam vs VWO
- Northbeam vs Whatagraph
- Northbeam vs Optimizely
- Northbeam vs Countly
- Northbeam vs CleverTap
- Northbeam vs Convert
- Northbeam vs Datorama
- Northbeam vs Freshpaint
- Northbeam vs Funnel.io
- Northbeam vs Google Optimize
- Northbeam vs Onclusive
- Northbeam vs Ahrefs
- Northbeam vs Invoca
- Northbeam vs Optimove
- Northbeam vs Swydo
- Northbeam vs WebEngage
- Northbeam vs Wunderkind
- Northbeam vs Buffer
- Northbeam vs Hootsuite
- Northbeam vs Moz
- Northbeam vs Improvado
- Northbeam vs Insider
- Northbeam vs Instapage
- Northbeam vs June
- Roxhill vs Triple Whale
- Roxhill vs Attribution
- Roxhill vs Marketing Evolution
- Roxhill vs Ruler Analytics
- Roxhill vs Adobe Analytics
- Roxhill vs Adverity
- Roxhill vs Kissmetrics
- Roxhill vs Woopra
- Roxhill vs VWO
- Roxhill vs Whatagraph
- Roxhill vs Optimizely
- Roxhill vs Countly
- Roxhill vs CleverTap
- Roxhill vs Convert
- Roxhill vs Datorama
- Roxhill vs Freshpaint
- Roxhill vs Funnel.io
- Roxhill vs Google Optimize
- Roxhill vs Onclusive
- Roxhill vs Ahrefs
- Roxhill vs Invoca
- Roxhill vs Optimove
- Roxhill vs Swydo
- Roxhill vs WebEngage
- Roxhill vs Wunderkind
- Roxhill vs Buffer
- Roxhill vs Hootsuite
- Roxhill vs Moz
- Roxhill vs Improvado
- Roxhill vs Insider
- Roxhill vs Instapage
- Roxhill vs June

