Construction · head to head
GCPay vs Tekla Structures

GCPay
Construction
Subcontractor pay application and lien waiver exchange for general contractors in North America
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Tekla Structures
Construction
BIM software for structural engineering and construction
- From
- $400/month
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: GCPay the subcontractor is a compelled user who did not choose the tool, so adoption friction and support load fall on the general contractor, and small trades with one bookkeeper resent every extra portal.; Tekla Structures no specific pricing published; three subscription options available but require sales contact
- They diverge on capability: GCPay covers Pay application workflow, Tekla Structures covers 3D structural modeling.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which GCPay and Tekla Structures actually diverge.
| Attribute | GCPay | Tekla Structures |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | On request | $400/month |
| Pricing model | quote | subscription |
| Platforms | Web | Windows |
| Founded | Unknown | 1978 |
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Construction).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in GCPay
- Pay application workflow
- Lien waiver exchange
- Compliance tracking
- Change order management
- ePayments
- Retainage handling
- ERP integration
- Subcontractor portal
Only in Tekla Structures
- 3D structural modeling
- Steel detailing
- Concrete detailing
- Drawing production
- Fabrication support
- Trimble Connect
- Revit
- AutoCAD
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
GCPay
- A general contractor in a strict lien state that has been burned by a missing unconditional waiver and needs waiver status tied to each payment rather than filed in a shared drivenot Tekla Structures
- A contractor whose accounts payable team spends the first week of every month rekeying pay applications from PDF emails into Sage or Viewpointnot Tekla Structures
- An owner-facing GC that must produce a clean audit trail of who was paid what and when, with insurance compliance evidence attachednot Tekla Structures
- A construction group standardising on Autodesk Construction Cloud that wants payment application data in the same estate as the project recordnot Tekla Structures
Tekla Structures
- Structural designnot GCPay
- Steel detailingnot GCPay
- Rebar detailingnot GCPay
- Fabrication managementnot GCPay
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
GCPay
- The subcontractor is a compelled user who did not choose the tool, so adoption friction and support load fall on the general contractor, and small trades with one bookkeeper resent every extra portal.
- Pricing is entirely quoted and keyed to annual subcontracted construction value, which means a contractor with a few very large subcontracts can pay far more than one with many small ones for identical functionality.
- The ePayment fee structure is decided per general contractor, so a subcontractor cannot predict its cost of getting paid across clients and may be charged on one job and not another for the same work.
- It is a payment and compliance system, not job costing; commitments still have to reconcile against the ERP, and integration gaps mean many contractors run a manual check anyway.
- Autodesk acquired parent Payapps in 2024, and the strategic direction is convergence with Autodesk Construction Cloud, so buyers on Procore or a non-Autodesk stack should ask directly what the roadmap commitment to their platform is.
Tekla Structures
- No specific pricing published; three subscription options available but require sales contact
- Flexible licensing that adjusts as company develops and grows, but specific rates not disclosed
Pricing, plan by plan
GCPay
On request- GCPay for General Contractors$undefined/year
- Priced on project count, subcontractor count and annual subcontracted volume
- Unlimited free subcontractor accounts
- Lien waiver and compliance tracking
- ePayments and Waiver Exchange$undefined/month
- Per-transaction fee disclosed at submission
- General contractor may absorb the fee or pass it to the subcontractor
- Subcontractor must acknowledge the fee before submitting
Tekla Structures
$400/month- Tekla Structures$400/month
- 3D modeling
- Detailing
- Drawing production
- EnterpriseFree
- Multi-user
- Advanced features
- Custom configurations
Which should you pick?
Choose Tekla Structures if
- You need 3d structural modeling.
- You work on Windows.
- You also want steel detailing.
Questions people ask
- Is GCPay or Tekla Structures better?
- Neither clearly leads. GCPay starts at On request and Tekla Structures at $400/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, GCPay or Tekla Structures?
- GCPay starts at On request and Tekla Structures at $400/month.
- Does GCPay or Tekla Structures run on more platforms?
- GCPay runs on Web. Tekla Structures runs on Windows.
- What is GCPay best used for?
- GCPay is most often used for a general contractor in a strict lien state that has been burned by a missing unconditional waiver and needs waiver status tied to each payment rather than filed in a shared drive, a contractor whose accounts payable team spends the first week of every month rekeying pay applications from pdf emails into sage or viewpoint, an owner-facing gc that must produce a clean audit trail of who was paid what and when, with insurance compliance evidence attached, a construction group standardising on autodesk construction cloud that wants payment application data in the same estate as the project record. Of those, a general contractor in a strict lien state that has been burned by a missing unconditional waiver and needs waiver status tied to each payment rather than filed in a shared drive and a contractor whose accounts payable team spends the first week of every month rekeying pay applications from pdf emails into sage or viewpoint are not what Tekla Structures is typically brought in for.
- What can GCPay do that Tekla Structures cannot?
- GCPay covers Pay application workflow, Lien waiver exchange, Compliance tracking, Change order management. Tekla Structures covers 3D structural modeling, Steel detailing, Concrete detailing, Drawing production.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
GCPay: Who pays for GCPay, the GC or the sub?
The general contractor pays the subscription. Subcontractor accounts are free. Only the optional ePayment and waiver exchange transaction fee can be passed to the subcontractor, and only with their acknowledgement.
Tekla Structures: Is there a free trial for Tekla Structures?
Yes, a 30-day free trial is available at https://download.trimble.com/tekla-structures/free-trial
SourceGCPay: How much is the ePayment fee?
It is a flat per-transaction fee, disclosed at the point the pay application is submitted. GCPay has published a $15 figure for the ePayments and waiver exchange service, and the GC decides who bears it.
Tekla Structures: What subscription options are available?
Tekla Structures offers three material-independent subscription options designed for specific user needs. Each subscription includes Trimble Connect Business Premium and Tekla Model Sharing collaboration platform. Contact Tekla for specific pricing and plan details.
SourceGCPay: Is GCPay owned by Autodesk?
Yes. Autodesk agreed to acquire Payapps, which trades as GCPay in North America and Payapps elsewhere, in January 2024.
GCPay: Does it replace our construction accounting system?
No. It handles the application, approval and compliance workflow and then pushes approved payments into your ERP.
GCPay: Can subcontractors export their own records?
Subcontractors can download their submitted applications and waivers, but the project record belongs to the general contractor's account, so a sub should keep its own copies rather than rely on continued portal access.
Related pages
More on Tekla Structures
Other head to heads
- GCPay vs Foundation Software
- GCPay vs Procore
- GCPay vs Oracle Textura Payment Management
- GCPay vs Trimble Pay
- GCPay vs Assignar
- GCPay vs Siteline
- GCPay vs Clearstory
- GCPay vs Kojo
- GCPay vs Adaptive
- GCPay vs Document Crunch
- GCPay vs HammerTech
- GCPay vs ConstructConnect
- GCPay vs Buildots
- GCPay vs Buildxact
- GCPay vs Chief Architect
- GCPay vs CMiC
- GCPay vs CoConstruct
- GCPay vs ArchiCAD
- GCPay vs Autodesk Revit
- GCPay vs Bluebeam Revu
- GCPay vs PlanSwift
- GCPay vs Primavera P6
- GCPay vs Raken
- GCPay vs iAuditor by SafetyCulture
- GCPay vs Jonas Premier
- GCPay vs Cubit Estimating
- GCPay vs Dalux
- GCPay vs e-Builder
- GCPay vs InEight
- GCPay vs Knowify
- GCPay vs Levelset
- GCPay vs Revit
- GCPay vs Oracle Aconex
- GCPay vs Navisworks
- Tekla Structures vs Foundation Software
- Tekla Structures vs Procore
- Tekla Structures vs Oracle Textura Payment Management
- Tekla Structures vs Trimble Pay
- Tekla Structures vs Assignar
- Tekla Structures vs Siteline
- Tekla Structures vs Clearstory
- Tekla Structures vs Kojo
- Tekla Structures vs Adaptive
- Tekla Structures vs Document Crunch
- Tekla Structures vs HammerTech
- Tekla Structures vs ConstructConnect
- Tekla Structures vs Buildots
- Tekla Structures vs Buildxact
- Tekla Structures vs Chief Architect
- Tekla Structures vs CMiC
- Tekla Structures vs CoConstruct
- Tekla Structures vs ArchiCAD
- Tekla Structures vs Autodesk Revit
- Tekla Structures vs Bluebeam Revu
- Tekla Structures vs PlanSwift
- Tekla Structures vs Primavera P6
- Tekla Structures vs Raken
- Tekla Structures vs iAuditor by SafetyCulture
- Tekla Structures vs Jonas Premier
- Tekla Structures vs Cubit Estimating
- Tekla Structures vs Dalux
- Tekla Structures vs e-Builder
- Tekla Structures vs InEight
- Tekla Structures vs Knowify
- Tekla Structures vs Levelset
- Tekla Structures vs Revit
- Tekla Structures vs Oracle Aconex
- Tekla Structures vs Navisworks
