Construction · head to head
GCPay vs PlanSwift

GCPay
Construction
Subcontractor pay application and lien waiver exchange for general contractors in North America
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: GCPay the subcontractor is a compelled user who did not choose the tool, so adoption friction and support load fall on the general contractor, and small trades with one bookkeeper resent every extra portal.; PlanSwift only one published plan tier (Professional at $2,000 annually)
- They diverge on capability: GCPay covers Pay application workflow, PlanSwift covers Digital takeoff.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which GCPay and PlanSwift actually diverge.
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Construction).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in GCPay
- Pay application workflow
- Lien waiver exchange
- Compliance tracking
- Change order management
- ePayments
- Retainage handling
- ERP integration
- Subcontractor portal
Only in PlanSwift
- Digital takeoff
- Estimating
- Assemblies
- Reporting
- Plan viewing
- QuickBooks
- Sage
- Excel
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
GCPay
- A general contractor in a strict lien state that has been burned by a missing unconditional waiver and needs waiver status tied to each payment rather than filed in a shared drivenot PlanSwift
- A contractor whose accounts payable team spends the first week of every month rekeying pay applications from PDF emails into Sage or Viewpointnot PlanSwift
- An owner-facing GC that must produce a clean audit trail of who was paid what and when, with insurance compliance evidence attachednot PlanSwift
- A construction group standardising on Autodesk Construction Cloud that wants payment application data in the same estate as the project recordnot PlanSwift
PlanSwift
- Taking off quantities from construction drawings on screennot GCPay
- Producing material and labour estimates from digital plansnot GCPay
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
GCPay
- The subcontractor is a compelled user who did not choose the tool, so adoption friction and support load fall on the general contractor, and small trades with one bookkeeper resent every extra portal.
- Pricing is entirely quoted and keyed to annual subcontracted construction value, which means a contractor with a few very large subcontracts can pay far more than one with many small ones for identical functionality.
- The ePayment fee structure is decided per general contractor, so a subcontractor cannot predict its cost of getting paid across clients and may be charged on one job and not another for the same work.
- It is a payment and compliance system, not job costing; commitments still have to reconcile against the ERP, and integration gaps mean many contractors run a manual check anyway.
- Autodesk acquired parent Payapps in 2024, and the strategic direction is convergence with Autodesk Construction Cloud, so buyers on Procore or a non-Autodesk stack should ask directly what the roadmap commitment to their platform is.
PlanSwift
- Only one published plan tier (Professional at $2,000 annually)
- Annual renewal required; no monthly subscription option stated
- No multi-user or team-based pricing options published
Pricing, plan by plan
GCPay
On request- GCPay for General Contractors$undefined/year
- Priced on project count, subcontractor count and annual subcontracted volume
- Unlimited free subcontractor accounts
- Lien waiver and compliance tracking
- ePayments and Waiver Exchange$undefined/month
- Per-transaction fee disclosed at submission
- General contractor may absorb the fee or pass it to the subcontractor
- Subcontractor must acknowledge the fee before submitting
PlanSwift
$1499/year- PlanSwift Pro$1499/year
- Digital takeoff
- Estimating
- Assemblies
- PlanSwift Pro+$2099/year
- Everything in Pro
- Advanced reports
- Priority support
Which should you pick?
Choose PlanSwift if
- You need digital takeoff.
- You work on Windows.
- You also want estimating.
Questions people ask
- Is GCPay or PlanSwift better?
- Neither clearly leads. GCPay starts at On request and PlanSwift at $1499/year, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, GCPay or PlanSwift?
- GCPay starts at On request and PlanSwift at $1499/year.
- Does GCPay or PlanSwift run on more platforms?
- GCPay runs on Web. PlanSwift runs on Windows.
- What is GCPay best used for?
- GCPay is most often used for a general contractor in a strict lien state that has been burned by a missing unconditional waiver and needs waiver status tied to each payment rather than filed in a shared drive, a contractor whose accounts payable team spends the first week of every month rekeying pay applications from pdf emails into sage or viewpoint, an owner-facing gc that must produce a clean audit trail of who was paid what and when, with insurance compliance evidence attached, a construction group standardising on autodesk construction cloud that wants payment application data in the same estate as the project record. Of those, a general contractor in a strict lien state that has been burned by a missing unconditional waiver and needs waiver status tied to each payment rather than filed in a shared drive and a contractor whose accounts payable team spends the first week of every month rekeying pay applications from pdf emails into sage or viewpoint are not what PlanSwift is typically brought in for.
- What can GCPay do that PlanSwift cannot?
- GCPay covers Pay application workflow, Lien waiver exchange, Compliance tracking, Change order management. PlanSwift covers Digital takeoff, Estimating, Assemblies, Reporting.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
GCPay: Who pays for GCPay, the GC or the sub?
The general contractor pays the subscription. Subcontractor accounts are free. Only the optional ePayment and waiver exchange transaction fee can be passed to the subcontractor, and only with their acknowledgement.
PlanSwift: How much does PlanSwift cost?
PlanSwift Professional costs $2,000 USD per year as an annual subscription. The price includes software access, updates, support for 12 months, and 2 hours of training.
SourceGCPay: How much is the ePayment fee?
It is a flat per-transaction fee, disclosed at the point the pay application is submitted. GCPay has published a $15 figure for the ePayments and waiver exchange service, and the GC decides who bears it.
PlanSwift: Does PlanSwift offer a free trial?
Yes, PlanSwift offers a 14-day free trial with no credit card required. This allows users to evaluate the software and its Takeoff Boost AI tools before committing to the annual subscription.
SourceGCPay: Is GCPay owned by Autodesk?
Yes. Autodesk agreed to acquire Payapps, which trades as GCPay in North America and Payapps elsewhere, in January 2024.
PlanSwift: What is included in PlanSwift Professional?
PlanSwift Professional includes full software access, 1 year of updates and support, 2 hours of training, and Takeoff Boost, a suite of AI tools that automates measuring, counting, and scaling tasks.
SourceGCPay: Does it replace our construction accounting system?
No. It handles the application, approval and compliance workflow and then pushes approved payments into your ERP.
GCPay: Can subcontractors export their own records?
Subcontractors can download their submitted applications and waivers, but the project record belongs to the general contractor's account, so a sub should keep its own copies rather than rely on continued portal access.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- GCPay vs Foundation Software
- GCPay vs Procore
- GCPay vs Oracle Textura Payment Management
- GCPay vs Trimble Pay
- GCPay vs Assignar
- GCPay vs Siteline
- GCPay vs Clearstory
- GCPay vs Kojo
- GCPay vs Adaptive
- GCPay vs Document Crunch
- GCPay vs HammerTech
- GCPay vs ConstructConnect
- GCPay vs Buildots
- GCPay vs Buildxact
- GCPay vs Chief Architect
- GCPay vs CMiC
- GCPay vs CoConstruct
- GCPay vs Cubit Estimating
- GCPay vs RIB CostX
- GCPay vs B2W Estimate
- GCPay vs Handoff
- GCPay vs HCSS HeavyBid
- GCPay vs Togal.AI
- GCPay vs ArchiCAD
- GCPay vs Autodesk Revit
- GCPay vs STACK Construction Technologies
- GCPay vs HCSS
- GCPay vs Billd
- GCPay vs Bridgit Bravo
- GCPay vs Builderbox
- GCPay vs SketchUp
- PlanSwift vs Foundation Software
- PlanSwift vs Procore
- PlanSwift vs Oracle Textura Payment Management
- PlanSwift vs Trimble Pay
- PlanSwift vs Assignar
- PlanSwift vs Siteline
- PlanSwift vs Clearstory
- PlanSwift vs Kojo
- PlanSwift vs Adaptive
- PlanSwift vs Document Crunch
- PlanSwift vs HammerTech
- PlanSwift vs ConstructConnect
- PlanSwift vs Buildots
- PlanSwift vs Buildxact
- PlanSwift vs Chief Architect
- PlanSwift vs CMiC
- PlanSwift vs CoConstruct
- PlanSwift vs Cubit Estimating
- PlanSwift vs RIB CostX
- PlanSwift vs B2W Estimate
- PlanSwift vs Handoff
- PlanSwift vs HCSS HeavyBid
- PlanSwift vs Togal.AI
- PlanSwift vs ArchiCAD
- PlanSwift vs Autodesk Revit
- PlanSwift vs STACK Construction Technologies
- PlanSwift vs HCSS
- PlanSwift vs Billd
- PlanSwift vs Bridgit Bravo
- PlanSwift vs Builderbox
- PlanSwift vs SketchUp
