Construction · head to head
Cubit Estimating vs Tekla Structures

Cubit Estimating
Construction
Australian estimating and on-screen takeoff in one window, priced openly per user per month
- From
- 167/month
- Rated
- -

Tekla Structures
Construction
BIM software for structural engineering and construction
- From
- $400/month
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Cubit Estimating every subscription carries a minimum twelve month term, so a firm that hires an estimator for one tender period pays for the full year regardless.; Tekla Structures no specific pricing published; three subscription options available but require sales contact
- They diverge on capability: Cubit Estimating covers Integrated takeoff and estimate, Tekla Structures covers 3D structural modeling.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Cubit Estimating and Tekla Structures actually diverge.
| Attribute | Cubit Estimating | Tekla Structures |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | 167/month | $400/month |
| Pricing model | Per user per month | subscription |
| Founded | Unknown | 1978 |
Identical on both: free tier (No), platforms (Windows), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Construction).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Cubit Estimating
- Integrated takeoff and estimate
- Calculation and rate sheets
- Price list management
- Bills of quantities
- BIM and IFC takeoff
- Revision management
- AI Estimating add-on
- Job collaboration
Only in Tekla Structures
- 3D structural modeling
- Steel detailing
- Concrete detailing
- Drawing production
- Fabrication support
- Trimble Connect
- Revit
- AutoCAD
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Cubit Estimating
- An Australian commercial builder that wants takeoff and estimate in one file rather than exporting quantities from a separate measurement toolnot Tekla Structures
- A quantity surveying practice producing trade-structured bills of quantities to local conventionnot Tekla Structures
- A subcontractor pricing repeat work from maintained supplier price lists rather than rebuilding rates each tendernot Tekla Structures
- A small estimating team that needs to know the annual cost before booking a demo, because the rate card is publishednot Tekla Structures
Tekla Structures
- Structural designnot Cubit Estimating
- Steel detailingnot Cubit Estimating
- Rebar detailingnot Cubit Estimating
- Fabrication managementnot Cubit Estimating
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Cubit Estimating
- Every subscription carries a minimum twelve month term, so a firm that hires an estimator for one tender period pays for the full year regardless.
- BIM and IFC takeoff sits only in Enterprise at $250 per user per month, meaning a builder who receives models rather than PDFs is pushed to the top tier whether or not it needs collaboration features.
- The product is Windows only with no macOS or browser client, which excludes practices standardised on Macs unless they run virtualisation.
- Rate libraries, measurement conventions and BOQ structures follow Australian practice, so buyers outside Australia and New Zealand inherit a method that does not match their local standard forms.
- The AI Estimating add-on is priced at an explicitly temporary introductory rate, so a firm building the feature into its workflow is accepting an unspecified future increase on top of the seat price.
Tekla Structures
- No specific pricing published; three subscription options available but require sales contact
- Flexible licensing that adjusts as company develops and grows, but specific rates not disclosed
Pricing, plan by plan
Cubit Estimating
167/month- Standard$167/month
- Integrated estimating and takeoff
- Calculation sheets, rate sheets and price lists
- Basic job management
- Professional$222/month
- Everything in Standard
- Code grouping
- Custom reporting
- Enterprise$250/month
- Everything in Professional
- BIM and IFC takeoff
- Multi-user job collaboration
- AI Estimating add-on$20/month
- Automated element recognition
- Works with any edition
- Introductory rate the vendor says will increase
Tekla Structures
$400/month- Tekla Structures$400/month
- 3D modeling
- Detailing
- Drawing production
- EnterpriseFree
- Multi-user
- Advanced features
- Custom configurations
Which should you pick?
Choose Cubit Estimating if
- You need integrated takeoff and estimate.
- You work on Windows.
- You also want calculation and rate sheets.
Choose Tekla Structures if
- You need 3d structural modeling.
- You work on Windows.
- You also want steel detailing.
Questions people ask
- Is Cubit Estimating or Tekla Structures better?
- Neither clearly leads. Cubit Estimating starts at 167/month and Tekla Structures at $400/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Cubit Estimating or Tekla Structures?
- Cubit Estimating starts at 167/month and Tekla Structures at $400/month.
- Does Cubit Estimating or Tekla Structures run on more platforms?
- Both run on Windows, so platform support will not decide this one for you.
- What is Cubit Estimating best used for?
- Cubit Estimating is most often used for an australian commercial builder that wants takeoff and estimate in one file rather than exporting quantities from a separate measurement tool, a quantity surveying practice producing trade-structured bills of quantities to local convention, a subcontractor pricing repeat work from maintained supplier price lists rather than rebuilding rates each tender, a small estimating team that needs to know the annual cost before booking a demo, because the rate card is published. Of those, an australian commercial builder that wants takeoff and estimate in one file rather than exporting quantities from a separate measurement tool and a quantity surveying practice producing trade-structured bills of quantities to local convention are not what Tekla Structures is typically brought in for.
- What can Cubit Estimating do that Tekla Structures cannot?
- Cubit Estimating covers Integrated takeoff and estimate, Calculation and rate sheets, Price list management, Bills of quantities. Tekla Structures covers 3D structural modeling, Steel detailing, Concrete detailing, Drawing production.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Cubit Estimating: What does Cubit actually cost?
Standard $167, Professional $222 and Enterprise $250 per user per month on annual billing, in Australian dollars excluding GST. Monthly billing is about 16 per cent more.
Tekla Structures: Is there a free trial for Tekla Structures?
Yes, a 30-day free trial is available at https://download.trimble.com/tekla-structures/free-trial
SourceCubit Estimating: Can I get BIM takeoff without the Enterprise tier?
No. IFC model takeoff is an Enterprise feature only.
Tekla Structures: What subscription options are available?
Tekla Structures offers three material-independent subscription options designed for specific user needs. Each subscription includes Trimble Connect Business Premium and Tekla Model Sharing collaboration platform. Contact Tekla for specific pricing and plan details.
SourceCubit Estimating: Is there a perpetual licence?
No. Cubit Estimating is subscription only with a minimum twelve month commitment.
Cubit Estimating: Does it suit contractors outside Australia?
It works, but rate libraries and BOQ conventions follow Australian standards, so buyers elsewhere do more setup than a locally built alternative would need.
Related pages
More on Cubit Estimating
More on Tekla Structures
Other head to heads
- Cubit Estimating vs Togal.AI
- Cubit Estimating vs PlanSwift
- Cubit Estimating vs Sage Estimating
- Cubit Estimating vs Bluebeam Revu
- Cubit Estimating vs RIB CostX
- Cubit Estimating vs On-Screen Takeoff
- Cubit Estimating vs HCSS
- Cubit Estimating vs HCSS HeavyBid
- Cubit Estimating vs Handoff
- Cubit Estimating vs STACK Construction Technologies
- Cubit Estimating vs B2W Estimate
- Cubit Estimating vs Dalux
- Cubit Estimating vs Bridgit Bravo
- Cubit Estimating vs Builderbox
- Cubit Estimating vs Buildots
- Cubit Estimating vs Buildxact
- Cubit Estimating vs Chief Architect
- Cubit Estimating vs Clearstory
- Cubit Estimating vs Procore
- Cubit Estimating vs ArchiCAD
- Cubit Estimating vs Autodesk Revit
- Cubit Estimating vs Primavera P6
- Cubit Estimating vs Raken
- Cubit Estimating vs iAuditor by SafetyCulture
- Cubit Estimating vs Jonas Premier
- Cubit Estimating vs e-Builder
- Cubit Estimating vs InEight
- Cubit Estimating vs Knowify
- Cubit Estimating vs Levelset
- Cubit Estimating vs Revit
- Cubit Estimating vs Oracle Aconex
- Cubit Estimating vs Navisworks
- Tekla Structures vs Togal.AI
- Tekla Structures vs PlanSwift
- Tekla Structures vs Sage Estimating
- Tekla Structures vs Bluebeam Revu
- Tekla Structures vs RIB CostX
- Tekla Structures vs On-Screen Takeoff
- Tekla Structures vs HCSS
- Tekla Structures vs HCSS HeavyBid
- Tekla Structures vs Handoff
- Tekla Structures vs STACK Construction Technologies
- Tekla Structures vs B2W Estimate
- Tekla Structures vs Dalux
- Tekla Structures vs Bridgit Bravo
- Tekla Structures vs Builderbox
- Tekla Structures vs Buildots
- Tekla Structures vs Buildxact
- Tekla Structures vs Chief Architect
- Tekla Structures vs Clearstory
- Tekla Structures vs Procore
- Tekla Structures vs ArchiCAD
- Tekla Structures vs Autodesk Revit
- Tekla Structures vs Primavera P6
- Tekla Structures vs Raken
- Tekla Structures vs iAuditor by SafetyCulture
- Tekla Structures vs Jonas Premier
- Tekla Structures vs e-Builder
- Tekla Structures vs InEight
- Tekla Structures vs Knowify
- Tekla Structures vs Levelset
- Tekla Structures vs Revit
- Tekla Structures vs Oracle Aconex
- Tekla Structures vs Navisworks
