Surveys · head to head
Fillout vs Onclusive

Fillout
Surveys
Form builder that reads and writes records in Airtable, Notion, HubSpot and Salesforce, with unlimited seats on every plan including the free one
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes

Onclusive
Marketing
Media monitoring, journalist database and PR measurement assembled from six acquired companies
- From
- On request
- Free plan
- No
The short version
- Only Fillout has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Fillout the Business plan is marketed with unlimited responses but the fair use policy names thresholds of 30,000 submissions a month, 250,000 in total, 500 forms per account and 50 GB of uploads a month, above which the vendor may limit or suspend features, so unlimited means unmetered rather than uncapped.; Onclusive onclusive was assembled from at least six acquired companies inside about a year, and users still encounter different interfaces, inconsistent data definitions and separate support paths depending on which module they are in, so training and internal reporting are harder than a single-product vendor.
- They diverge on capability: Fillout covers Unlimited seats and forms, Onclusive covers Global media monitoring.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Fillout and Onclusive actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Fillout
- Unlimited seats and forms
- Database read and write
- Soft response limits
- Conditional logic and calculations
- EU hosting
- REST API and webhooks
Only in Onclusive
- Global media monitoring
- Broadcast monitoring
- Social listening
- Media contacts database
- Newsroom and press office
- Sentiment and tone analysis
- Share of voice reporting
- Crisis detection
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Fillout
- A team already running on Airtable or Notion that wants forms which update existing records rather than appending new rowsnot Onclusive
- An organisation with many occasional form builders, where per-seat pricing elsewhere would cost more than the forms are worthnot Onclusive
- Replacing a survey tool, a scheduling tool and a payment link with one form that does all threenot Onclusive
- Public forms that must keep collecting through an unexpected traffic spike rather than shutting off at a quotanot Onclusive
Onclusive
- A multinational communications team that needs print, broadcast and online coverage across twenty markets reported in one dashboard rather than through three regional vendorsnot Fillout
- A public affairs team that must evidence share of voice against named competitors for a quarterly board reportnot Fillout
- A PR agency running press office and media enquiry workflow for several client brands from one systemnot Fillout
- A corporate affairs function that needs early warning on a coverage spike outside its own time zone, with broadcast clips retrievable for legal reviewnot Fillout
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Fillout
- The Business plan is marketed with unlimited responses but the fair use policy names thresholds of 30,000 submissions a month, 250,000 in total, 500 forms per account and 50 GB of uploads a month, above which the vendor may limit or suspend features, so unlimited means unmetered rather than uncapped.
- EU data residency begins on the Team plan at 250 USD per month, more than three times the Business price, and is not applied automatically; you must upgrade and then raise a support request to be moved.
- The Team plan is hidden behind a secondary tab that does not render without interaction, so buyers reading the pricing page see Business at 75 USD as the top self-serve tier and only discover the 250 USD step when they ask for single sign-on or EU hosting.
- The enterprise marketing page lists hosting in the United States, EU, United Kingdom, Australia and Canada, but the security documentation and subprocessor list name only the United States and the EU, so three of those five regions should be confirmed in writing before they are relied on.
- The vendor is SOC 2 Type 2 but claims neither ISO 27001 nor HIPAA anywhere in its documentation, and it is angel-funded with no disclosed institutional round while the parent company now trades as Zite and ships a separate AI application builder.
Onclusive
- Onclusive was assembled from at least six acquired companies inside about a year, and users still encounter different interfaces, inconsistent data definitions and separate support paths depending on which module they are in, so training and internal reporting are harder than a single-product vendor.
- Pricing is not published and is scoped by market coverage, source count and user seats, which makes competitive benchmarking difficult and means renewal increases are hard to challenge without a parallel quote from Cision or Meltwater.
- Broadcast monitoring coverage is uneven by country, so a global contract can look complete on paper while a specific market you care about has thin local radio or regional television coverage; verify your priority markets by name before signing.
- The company carries private-equity ownership and acquisition-related debt financing, which historically in this category has meant pressure on support headcount and above-inflation renewal pricing rather than product investment.
- Automated sentiment classification on news copy remains error-prone, especially for irony, quoted criticism and industry jargon, so teams reporting sentiment to executives generally need a human review step that erodes the labour saving the tool was bought for.
Pricing, plan by plan
Fillout
Free- FreeFree
- 1,000 responses per month
- Unlimited forms and unlimited seats
- 20 MB per file upload
- Starter$15/month
- 180 USD per year billed annually, a stated 20 percent saving on monthly billing
- 2,000 responses per month
- Unlimited forms and seats
- Pro$40/month
- 480 USD per year billed annually
- 5,000 responses per month
- Branding fully removed at this tier
- Business$75/month
- 900 USD per year billed annually
- Marketed as unlimited responses, subject to a fair use threshold near 30,000 per month
- 1 GB per file upload
Onclusive
On request- Onclusive$undefined/year
- Global media monitoring
- Broadcast and print coverage
- Onclusive Social listening
Which should you pick?
Choose Fillout if
- You need unlimited seats and forms.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, API.
- You also want database read and write.
Choose Onclusive if
- You need global media monitoring.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android, API.
- You also want broadcast monitoring.
Questions people ask
- Is Fillout or Onclusive better?
- Neither clearly leads. Fillout starts at Free and Onclusive at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Fillout or Onclusive?
- Fillout has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Fillout and On request for Onclusive.
- Does Fillout or Onclusive run on more platforms?
- Fillout runs on Web, API. Onclusive runs on Web, iOS, Android, API.
- Can I use Fillout for free?
- Yes. Fillout has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Onclusive starts at On request.
- What is Fillout best used for?
- Fillout is most often used for a team already running on airtable or notion that wants forms which update existing records rather than appending new rows, an organisation with many occasional form builders, where per-seat pricing elsewhere would cost more than the forms are worth, replacing a survey tool, a scheduling tool and a payment link with one form that does all three, public forms that must keep collecting through an unexpected traffic spike rather than shutting off at a quota. Of those, a team already running on airtable or notion that wants forms which update existing records rather than appending new rows and an organisation with many occasional form builders, where per-seat pricing elsewhere would cost more than the forms are worth are not what Onclusive is typically brought in for.
- What can Fillout do that Onclusive cannot?
- Fillout covers Unlimited seats and forms, Database read and write, Soft response limits, Conditional logic and calculations. Onclusive covers Global media monitoring, Broadcast monitoring, Social listening, Media contacts database.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Fillout: Are seats really unlimited?
Yes. The vendor states there are no per-seat charges on any plan, including Free, and forms are unlimited too. Responses per month is the only meter below the Business tier.
Onclusive: Is Onclusive one product or several?
Several. It was formed from Kantar Reputation Intelligence, PRgloo and the original Onclusive in January 2022, then absorbed Critical Mention and Digimind later that year, and the modules retain distinguishable lineages.
Fillout: What happens when I exceed my response quota?
Nothing breaks. Forms keep collecting, and you can upgrade, buy bulk submissions or wait for the monthly reset.
Onclusive: Who owns it?
Symphony Technology Group, a US private equity firm, with debt financing on the Critical Mention acquisition from Stellus Capital Management.
Fillout: Can I host respondent data in the EU?
Only from the Team plan at 250 USD per month, and only after contacting support to switch. Note that email and payment subprocessors remain in the United States regardless.
Onclusive: What happened to Digimind?
Digimind was acquired in July 2022 and rebranded as Onclusive Social in October 2022. If social listening is your main requirement, that is the platform you are evaluating.
Fillout: Is the Business plan really unlimited responses?
It is unmetered, not uncapped. The fair use policy names roughly 30,000 submissions a month as the point at which the vendor may intervene, so treat that as the practical ceiling.
Onclusive: Does it publish pricing?
No. Contracts are annual and quoted according to markets monitored, sources covered and seat count.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Fillout vs Tally
- Fillout vs Jotform
- Fillout vs SurveyCTO
- Fillout vs SurveyLegend
- Fillout vs Medallia
- Fillout vs Zonka Feedback
- Fillout vs QuestionPro
- Fillout vs KoboToolbox
- Fillout vs Microsoft Forms
- Fillout vs Retool
- Fillout vs Cognito Forms
- Fillout vs GetFeedback
- Fillout vs Paperform
- Fillout vs Device Magic
- Fillout vs Google Forms
- Fillout vs Sogolytics
- Fillout vs Roxhill
- Fillout vs Northbeam
- Fillout vs Buffer
- Fillout vs Hootsuite
- Fillout vs Bloomreach
- Fillout vs Freshpaint
- Fillout vs Umami
- Fillout vs VWO
- Fillout vs Moz
- Fillout vs MoEngage
- Fillout vs Zoho Marketing Automation
- Fillout vs Adverity
- Fillout vs Typeform
- Fillout vs Optimizely
- Fillout vs Vimeo
- Fillout vs Attribution
- Fillout vs Countly
- Onclusive vs Tally
- Onclusive vs Jotform
- Onclusive vs SurveyCTO
- Onclusive vs SurveyLegend
- Onclusive vs Medallia
- Onclusive vs Zonka Feedback
- Onclusive vs QuestionPro
- Onclusive vs KoboToolbox
- Onclusive vs Microsoft Forms
- Onclusive vs Retool
- Onclusive vs Cognito Forms
- Onclusive vs GetFeedback
- Onclusive vs Paperform
- Onclusive vs Device Magic
- Onclusive vs Google Forms
- Onclusive vs Sogolytics
- Onclusive vs Roxhill
- Onclusive vs Northbeam
- Onclusive vs Buffer
- Onclusive vs Hootsuite
- Onclusive vs Bloomreach
- Onclusive vs Freshpaint
- Onclusive vs Umami
- Onclusive vs VWO
- Onclusive vs Moz
- Onclusive vs MoEngage
- Onclusive vs Zoho Marketing Automation
- Onclusive vs Adverity
- Onclusive vs Typeform
- Onclusive vs Optimizely
- Onclusive vs Vimeo
- Onclusive vs Attribution
- Onclusive vs Countly
