Maps · head to head
Felt vs OpenRouteService

Felt
Maps
Collaborative browser mapping with a free non-commercial tier and annual-only paid contracts
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

OpenRouteService
Maps
Open-source routing, geocoding, and isochrone APIs based on OpenStreetMap data for developers and enterprises
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Felt felt publishes no prices for Professional or Enterprise, so buyers cannot compare against ArcGIS Online or QGIS with hosting without entering a sales process; OpenRouteService free tier limited to 500 Isochrones requests per day
- They diverge on capability: Felt covers Real-time collaboration, OpenRouteService covers Core Functionality.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Felt and OpenRouteService actually diverge.
| Attribute | Felt | OpenRouteService |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | quote | freemium |
| Platforms | Web, iOS, Android | Web |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Maps).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Felt
- Real-time collaboration
- Drag and drop data
- Unlimited viewers
- Field app with offline support
- Dashboards
- Live cloud sources
- API and SDK
Only in OpenRouteService
- Core Functionality
- User Interface
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Felt
- An environmental consultancy that needs a client to view and comment on survey results without installing GIS softwarenot OpenRouteService
- A utility field crew collecting asset condition offline and syncing to the same map the office is looking atnot OpenRouteService
- A planning department sharing a proposal map with the public where the viewer count is unpredictable and viewer seats would be uncostednot OpenRouteService
- A team of analysts who each hold data in different formats and want one map assembled in an afternoon rather than a weeknot OpenRouteService
OpenRouteService
- Directions routing for cars, trucks, bikes, walking, hiking, wheelchairnot Felt
- Reachability analysis with isochrones for time and distance calculationsnot Felt
- Many-to-many distance matrix calculationsnot Felt
- Location geocoding and conversion to coordinatesnot Felt
- Points of interest discovery and mappingnot Felt
- Elevation data enrichment using SRTM satellite datanot Felt
- Vehicle routing problem optimizationnot Felt
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Felt
- Felt publishes no prices for Professional or Enterprise, so buyers cannot compare against ArcGIS Online or QGIS with hosting without entering a sales process
- Paid tiers are annual contract only with no monthly option, which excludes consultancies that need a tool for a single short engagement and forces them to the free non-commercial tier they are not licensed to use for client work
- The API, JavaScript SDK and live warehouse connections are enterprise-only, so a mid-sized team that wants programmatic access has to buy the top tier rather than pay for one capability
- Analytical depth is limited: there is no meaningful geoprocessing, topology checking or model building, so Felt sits beside a real GIS rather than replacing one
- The Professional tier caps data processing at 25 GB a month and map views at 100,000 a month, which are easy to exceed with raster imagery or a public-facing map, and the overage terms are not published either
OpenRouteService
- Free tier limited to 500 Isochrones requests per day
- API restrictions exist but details not fully documented on main page
- Specific pricing tiers and costs not published on primary website
Pricing, plan by plan
Felt
Free- PersonalFree
- Free forever for non-commercial mapping
- Map creation, upload and sharing
- Not licensed for commercial use
- Professional$undefined/year
- 10 full-access seats with unlimited viewers
- 25 GB of data processing per month
- 100,000 map views per month
- Enterprise$undefined/year
- Live cloud sources including Postgres, Snowflake, BigQuery, Databricks and S3
- REST API and JavaScript SDK
- AI features
OpenRouteService
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the OpenRouteService review.
Which should you pick?
Choose Felt if
- You need real-time collaboration.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want drag and drop data.
Choose OpenRouteService if
- You need core functionality.
- You want to start without paying.
- You also want user interface.
Questions people ask
- Is Felt or OpenRouteService better?
- Neither clearly leads. Felt starts at Free and OpenRouteService at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Felt or OpenRouteService?
- Felt starts at Free and OpenRouteService at Free.
- Does Felt or OpenRouteService run on more platforms?
- Felt runs on Web, iOS, Android. OpenRouteService runs on Web.
- Can I use Felt for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Felt best used for?
- Felt is most often used for an environmental consultancy that needs a client to view and comment on survey results without installing gis software, a utility field crew collecting asset condition offline and syncing to the same map the office is looking at, a planning department sharing a proposal map with the public where the viewer count is unpredictable and viewer seats would be uncosted, a team of analysts who each hold data in different formats and want one map assembled in an afternoon rather than a week. Of those, an environmental consultancy that needs a client to view and comment on survey results without installing gis software and a utility field crew collecting asset condition offline and syncing to the same map the office is looking at are not what OpenRouteService is typically brought in for.
- What can Felt do that OpenRouteService cannot?
- Felt covers Real-time collaboration, Drag and drop data, Unlimited viewers, Field app with offline support. OpenRouteService covers Core Functionality, User Interface.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Felt: What does Felt cost?
Felt does not publish prices for Professional or Enterprise. Personal is free but licensed for non-commercial use only.
OpenRouteService: How much does OpenRouteService cost?
OpenRouteService is free to use and open source. The free tier includes up to 500 Isochrones requests per day. Specific pricing for higher usage tiers is not published on the main pricing page.
SourceFelt: Can I pay monthly?
No. Paid plans are annual contracts. There is a 7 day trial of Professional.
OpenRouteService: Is there a free version of OpenRouteService?
Yes, OpenRouteService is completely free to use and built on open source technology. All services are presented as free to use and based on user-generated and collaboratively collected geographic data from OpenStreetMap.
SourceFelt: Do viewers cost anything?
No. Viewer access is unlimited on the paid plans, which is the main reason organisations with large map audiences choose it.
Felt: Is there a nonprofit discount?
Yes, 30 per cent for verified United States nonprofits, and free access for verified students and classrooms.
Related pages
More on OpenRouteService
Other head to heads
- Felt vs Esri ArcGIS
- Felt vs CARTO
- Felt vs QGIS
- Felt vs Atlas.co
- Felt vs Global Mapper
- Felt vs GRASS GIS
- Felt vs onX Maps
- Felt vs Ride with GPS
- Felt vs SW Maps
- Felt vs TomTom Developer Portal
- Felt vs Kepler.gl
- Felt vs Trailforks
- Felt vs AllTrails
- Felt vs Bing Maps
- Felt vs Cesium ion
- Felt vs Citymapper
- Felt vs ArcGIS Survey123
- Felt vs ArcGIS Field Maps
- Felt vs Google Maps Platform
- Felt vs Mapbox
- Felt vs HERE Technologies
- Felt vs Apple Maps
- Felt vs Geoapify
- Felt vs LocationIQ
- Felt vs Stadia Maps
- Felt vs OsmAnd
- Felt vs GraphHopper
- Felt vs MapTiler
- Felt vs MAPS.ME
- Felt vs OSRM
- Felt vs Polaris Navigation GPS
- Felt vs PositionStack
- Felt vs Radar
- Felt vs SAGA GIS
- OpenRouteService vs Esri ArcGIS
- OpenRouteService vs CARTO
- OpenRouteService vs QGIS
- OpenRouteService vs Atlas.co
- OpenRouteService vs Global Mapper
- OpenRouteService vs GRASS GIS
- OpenRouteService vs onX Maps
- OpenRouteService vs Ride with GPS
- OpenRouteService vs SW Maps
- OpenRouteService vs TomTom Developer Portal
- OpenRouteService vs Kepler.gl
- OpenRouteService vs Trailforks
- OpenRouteService vs AllTrails
- OpenRouteService vs Bing Maps
- OpenRouteService vs Cesium ion
- OpenRouteService vs Citymapper
- OpenRouteService vs ArcGIS Survey123
- OpenRouteService vs ArcGIS Field Maps
- OpenRouteService vs Google Maps Platform
- OpenRouteService vs Mapbox
- OpenRouteService vs HERE Technologies
- OpenRouteService vs Apple Maps
- OpenRouteService vs Geoapify
- OpenRouteService vs LocationIQ
- OpenRouteService vs Stadia Maps
- OpenRouteService vs OsmAnd
- OpenRouteService vs GraphHopper
- OpenRouteService vs MapTiler
- OpenRouteService vs MAPS.ME
- OpenRouteService vs OSRM
- OpenRouteService vs Polaris Navigation GPS
- OpenRouteService vs PositionStack
- OpenRouteService vs Radar
- OpenRouteService vs SAGA GIS
