Maps · head to head
Felt vs GraphHopper

Felt
Maps
Collaborative browser mapping with a free non-commercial tier and annual-only paid contracts
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

GraphHopper
Maps
Open-source routing engine for road networks, providing fast route calculations, turn-by-turn navigation
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Felt has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Felt felt publishes no prices for Professional or Enterprise, so buyers cannot compare against ArcGIS Online or QGIS with hosting without entering a sales process; GraphHopper the free plan is non commercial use only
- They diverge on capability: Felt covers Real-time collaboration, GraphHopper covers Core Functionality.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Felt and GraphHopper actually diverge.
| Attribute | Felt | GraphHopper |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free | On request |
| Pricing model | quote | freemium |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Platforms | Web, iOS, Android | Web |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Maps).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Felt
- Real-time collaboration
- Drag and drop data
- Unlimited viewers
- Field app with offline support
- Dashboards
- Live cloud sources
- API and SDK
Only in GraphHopper
- Core Functionality
- User Interface
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Felt
- An environmental consultancy that needs a client to view and comment on survey results without installing GIS softwarenot GraphHopper
- A utility field crew collecting asset condition offline and syncing to the same map the office is looking atnot GraphHopper
- A planning department sharing a proposal map with the public where the viewer count is unpredictable and viewer seats would be uncostednot GraphHopper
- A team of analysts who each hold data in different formats and want one map assembled in an afternoon rather than a weeknot GraphHopper
GraphHopper
- Routing, distance matrix and route optimisation over an APInot Felt
- Map matching GPS traces and generating isochronesnot Felt
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Felt
- Felt publishes no prices for Professional or Enterprise, so buyers cannot compare against ArcGIS Online or QGIS with hosting without entering a sales process
- Paid tiers are annual contract only with no monthly option, which excludes consultancies that need a tool for a single short engagement and forces them to the free non-commercial tier they are not licensed to use for client work
- The API, JavaScript SDK and live warehouse connections are enterprise-only, so a mid-sized team that wants programmatic access has to buy the top tier rather than pay for one capability
- Analytical depth is limited: there is no meaningful geoprocessing, topology checking or model building, so Felt sits beside a real GIS rather than replacing one
- The Professional tier caps data processing at 25 GB a month and map views at 100,000 a month, which are easy to exceed with raster imagery or a public-facing map, and the overage terms are not published either
GraphHopper
- The free plan is non commercial use only
- Free allows 500 credits a day, 5 locations per request and a single vehicle
- Request complexity is capped per plan, at 30 locations and 2 vehicles on Basic at 69 EUR a month, rising to 200 locations and 20 vehicles on Premium at 479 EUR
- Isochrone range is limited by plan, at 15 minutes on Basic and 30 on Premium
- Credits are a daily allowance, so a busy day cannot draw on a quiet one
Pricing, plan by plan
Felt
Free- PersonalFree
- Free forever for non-commercial mapping
- Map creation, upload and sharing
- Not licensed for commercial use
- Professional$undefined/year
- 10 full-access seats with unlimited viewers
- 25 GB of data processing per month
- 100,000 map views per month
- Enterprise$undefined/year
- Live cloud sources including Postgres, Snowflake, BigQuery, Databricks and S3
- REST API and JavaScript SDK
- AI features
GraphHopper
On requestNo published plan breakdown. See the GraphHopper review.
Which should you pick?
Choose Felt if
- You need real-time collaboration.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want drag and drop data.
Questions people ask
- Is Felt or GraphHopper better?
- Neither clearly leads. Felt starts at Free and GraphHopper at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Felt or GraphHopper?
- Felt has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Felt and On request for GraphHopper.
- Does Felt or GraphHopper run on more platforms?
- Felt runs on Web, iOS, Android. GraphHopper runs on Web.
- Can I use Felt for free?
- Yes. Felt has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. GraphHopper starts at On request.
- What is Felt best used for?
- Felt is most often used for an environmental consultancy that needs a client to view and comment on survey results without installing gis software, a utility field crew collecting asset condition offline and syncing to the same map the office is looking at, a planning department sharing a proposal map with the public where the viewer count is unpredictable and viewer seats would be uncosted, a team of analysts who each hold data in different formats and want one map assembled in an afternoon rather than a week. Of those, an environmental consultancy that needs a client to view and comment on survey results without installing gis software and a utility field crew collecting asset condition offline and syncing to the same map the office is looking at are not what GraphHopper is typically brought in for.
- What can Felt do that GraphHopper cannot?
- Felt covers Real-time collaboration, Drag and drop data, Unlimited viewers, Field app with offline support. GraphHopper covers Core Functionality, User Interface.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Felt: What does Felt cost?
Felt does not publish prices for Professional or Enterprise. Personal is free but licensed for non-commercial use only.
GraphHopper: Is the free plan actually usable for production?
No. The free tier is limited to non-commercial use only and includes 500 daily credits. To use GraphHopper in production, you need a paid plan starting at 69 euros per month.
SourceFelt: Can I pay monthly?
No. Paid plans are annual contracts. There is a 7 day trial of Professional.
GraphHopper: What happens if I exceed my daily credit limit?
The page does not specify. Each tier has a daily credit limit (500 for free, 5,000 for Basic, 15,000 for Standard, 50,000 for Premium), but no overage policy is documented.
SourceFelt: Do viewers cost anything?
No. Viewer access is unlimited on the paid plans, which is the main reason organisations with large map audiences choose it.
GraphHopper: Does GraphHopper offer a trial period?
No. There is no trial period. You can start with the free plan to test, but commercial use requires a paid subscription.
SourceFelt: Is there a nonprofit discount?
Yes, 30 per cent for verified United States nonprofits, and free access for verified students and classrooms.
GraphHopper: How much does the Premium plan cost and what do I get?
Premium is 479 euros per month and includes 50,000 daily credits, up to 200 locations per request, up to 20 vehicles, email and phone support, and access to all APIs including routing and optimization.
SourceGraphHopper: Is there a discount if I link back to GraphHopper?
Yes. A 20% discount is available with proper attribution. The page also mentions a 99.5% uptime SLA on paid plans only.
SourceRelated pages
More on GraphHopper
Other head to heads
- Felt vs Esri ArcGIS
- Felt vs CARTO
- Felt vs QGIS
- Felt vs Atlas.co
- Felt vs Global Mapper
- Felt vs GRASS GIS
- Felt vs onX Maps
- Felt vs Ride with GPS
- Felt vs SW Maps
- Felt vs TomTom Developer Portal
- Felt vs Kepler.gl
- Felt vs Trailforks
- Felt vs AllTrails
- Felt vs Bing Maps
- Felt vs Cesium ion
- Felt vs Citymapper
- Felt vs ArcGIS Survey123
- Felt vs ArcGIS Field Maps
- Felt vs Google Maps Platform
- Felt vs Apple Maps
- Felt vs Mapbox
- Felt vs HERE Technologies
- Felt vs OSRM
- Felt vs Geoapify
- Felt vs LocationIQ
- Felt vs OpenRouteService
- Felt vs Stadia Maps
- Felt vs MapTiler
- Felt vs Potree
- Felt vs WhiteboxTools
- Felt vs Agisoft Metashape
- GraphHopper vs Esri ArcGIS
- GraphHopper vs CARTO
- GraphHopper vs QGIS
- GraphHopper vs Atlas.co
- GraphHopper vs Global Mapper
- GraphHopper vs GRASS GIS
- GraphHopper vs onX Maps
- GraphHopper vs Ride with GPS
- GraphHopper vs SW Maps
- GraphHopper vs TomTom Developer Portal
- GraphHopper vs Kepler.gl
- GraphHopper vs Trailforks
- GraphHopper vs AllTrails
- GraphHopper vs Bing Maps
- GraphHopper vs Cesium ion
- GraphHopper vs Citymapper
- GraphHopper vs ArcGIS Survey123
- GraphHopper vs ArcGIS Field Maps
- GraphHopper vs Google Maps Platform
- GraphHopper vs Apple Maps
- GraphHopper vs Mapbox
- GraphHopper vs HERE Technologies
- GraphHopper vs OSRM
- GraphHopper vs Geoapify
- GraphHopper vs LocationIQ
- GraphHopper vs OpenRouteService
- GraphHopper vs Stadia Maps
- GraphHopper vs MapTiler
- GraphHopper vs Potree
- GraphHopper vs WhiteboxTools
- GraphHopper vs Agisoft Metashape
