Maps · head to head
GraphHopper vs OpenRouteService

GraphHopper
Maps
Open-source routing engine for road networks, providing fast route calculations, turn-by-turn navigation
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

OpenRouteService
Maps
Open-source routing, geocoding, and isochrone APIs based on OpenStreetMap data for developers and enterprises
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only OpenRouteService has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: GraphHopper the free plan is non commercial use only; OpenRouteService free tier limited to 500 Isochrones requests per day
- Prices and features above were last checked on 29 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which GraphHopper and OpenRouteService actually diverge.
| Attribute | GraphHopper | OpenRouteService |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | On request | Free |
| Free tier | No | Yes |
Identical on both: pricing model (freemium), platforms (Web), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Maps).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in GraphHopper
Nothing recorded that OpenRouteService does not also cover.
Only in OpenRouteService
Nothing recorded that GraphHopper does not also cover.
Both cover
- Core Functionality
- User Interface
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
GraphHopper
- Routing, distance matrix and route optimisation over an APInot OpenRouteService
- Map matching GPS traces and generating isochronesnot OpenRouteService
OpenRouteService
- Directions routing for cars, trucks, bikes, walking, hiking, wheelchairnot GraphHopper
- Reachability analysis with isochrones for time and distance calculationsnot GraphHopper
- Many-to-many distance matrix calculationsnot GraphHopper
- Location geocoding and conversion to coordinatesnot GraphHopper
- Points of interest discovery and mappingnot GraphHopper
- Elevation data enrichment using SRTM satellite datanot GraphHopper
- Vehicle routing problem optimizationnot GraphHopper
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
GraphHopper
- The free plan is non commercial use only
- Free allows 500 credits a day, 5 locations per request and a single vehicle
- Request complexity is capped per plan, at 30 locations and 2 vehicles on Basic at 69 EUR a month, rising to 200 locations and 20 vehicles on Premium at 479 EUR
- Isochrone range is limited by plan, at 15 minutes on Basic and 30 on Premium
- Credits are a daily allowance, so a busy day cannot draw on a quiet one
OpenRouteService
- Free tier limited to 500 Isochrones requests per day
- API restrictions exist but details not fully documented on main page
- Specific pricing tiers and costs not published on primary website
Pricing, plan by plan
GraphHopper
On requestNo published plan breakdown. See the GraphHopper review.
OpenRouteService
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the OpenRouteService review.
Which should you pick?
Choose GraphHopper if
Nothing in the data separates GraphHopper from OpenRouteService on the points above - pick on price and on how each one feels to use.
Questions people ask
- Is GraphHopper or OpenRouteService better?
- Neither clearly leads. GraphHopper starts at On request and OpenRouteService at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, GraphHopper or OpenRouteService?
- OpenRouteService has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at On request for GraphHopper and Free for OpenRouteService.
- Does GraphHopper or OpenRouteService run on more platforms?
- Both run on Web, so platform support will not decide this one for you.
- Can I use OpenRouteService for free?
- Yes. OpenRouteService has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. GraphHopper starts at On request.
- What is GraphHopper best used for?
- GraphHopper is most often used for routing, distance matrix and route optimisation over an api, map matching gps traces and generating isochrones. Of those, routing, distance matrix and route optimisation over an api and map matching gps traces and generating isochrones are not what OpenRouteService is typically brought in for.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
GraphHopper: Is the free plan actually usable for production?
No. The free tier is limited to non-commercial use only and includes 500 daily credits. To use GraphHopper in production, you need a paid plan starting at 69 euros per month.
SourceOpenRouteService: How much does OpenRouteService cost?
OpenRouteService is free to use and open source. The free tier includes up to 500 Isochrones requests per day. Specific pricing for higher usage tiers is not published on the main pricing page.
SourceGraphHopper: What happens if I exceed my daily credit limit?
The page does not specify. Each tier has a daily credit limit (500 for free, 5,000 for Basic, 15,000 for Standard, 50,000 for Premium), but no overage policy is documented.
SourceOpenRouteService: Is there a free version of OpenRouteService?
Yes, OpenRouteService is completely free to use and built on open source technology. All services are presented as free to use and based on user-generated and collaboratively collected geographic data from OpenStreetMap.
SourceGraphHopper: Does GraphHopper offer a trial period?
No. There is no trial period. You can start with the free plan to test, but commercial use requires a paid subscription.
SourceGraphHopper: How much does the Premium plan cost and what do I get?
Premium is 479 euros per month and includes 50,000 daily credits, up to 200 locations per request, up to 20 vehicles, email and phone support, and access to all APIs including routing and optimization.
SourceGraphHopper: Is there a discount if I link back to GraphHopper?
Yes. A 20% discount is available with proper attribution. The page also mentions a 99.5% uptime SLA on paid plans only.
SourceRelated pages
More on GraphHopper
More on OpenRouteService
Other head to heads
- GraphHopper vs Google Maps Platform
- GraphHopper vs Apple Maps
- GraphHopper vs Mapbox
- GraphHopper vs HERE Technologies
- GraphHopper vs OSRM
- GraphHopper vs Ride with GPS
- GraphHopper vs Geoapify
- GraphHopper vs LocationIQ
- GraphHopper vs Stadia Maps
- GraphHopper vs Bing Maps
- GraphHopper vs GRASS GIS
- GraphHopper vs MapTiler
- GraphHopper vs onX Maps
- GraphHopper vs Potree
- GraphHopper vs SW Maps
- GraphHopper vs WhiteboxTools
- GraphHopper vs Agisoft Metashape
- GraphHopper vs OsmAnd
- GraphHopper vs MAPS.ME
- GraphHopper vs Polaris Navigation GPS
- GraphHopper vs PositionStack
- GraphHopper vs Radar
- GraphHopper vs SAGA GIS
- OpenRouteService vs Google Maps Platform
- OpenRouteService vs Apple Maps
- OpenRouteService vs Mapbox
- OpenRouteService vs HERE Technologies
- OpenRouteService vs OSRM
- OpenRouteService vs Ride with GPS
- OpenRouteService vs Geoapify
- OpenRouteService vs LocationIQ
- OpenRouteService vs Stadia Maps
- OpenRouteService vs Bing Maps
- OpenRouteService vs GRASS GIS
- OpenRouteService vs MapTiler
- OpenRouteService vs onX Maps
- OpenRouteService vs Potree
- OpenRouteService vs SW Maps
- OpenRouteService vs WhiteboxTools
- OpenRouteService vs Agisoft Metashape
- OpenRouteService vs OsmAnd
- OpenRouteService vs MAPS.ME
- OpenRouteService vs Polaris Navigation GPS
- OpenRouteService vs PositionStack
- OpenRouteService vs Radar
- OpenRouteService vs SAGA GIS
