Softwr

Maps · alternatives

Alternatives to Felt

22 maps tools sit alongside Felt in this directory. Below is what separates each from Felt on the figures we hold, price, model, tier count and rating, and a direct comparison for every one.

Alternatives listed
22
With a free tier
11
Cheaper to start
-
Felt starts at
Free

Why people look past Felt

Nothing on the record flags a reason to move. Felt has a free tier. People still switch over fit and workflow, and those are not things a catalogue entry can measure, which is what the comparisons below are for.

What each alternative does differently

Ordered by the aggregated rating on each catalogue entry. Differences are drawn from price, pricing model, tier count and rating, the fields the category listing carries. For a feature-level difference, follow the head-to-head link on each card: those pages read both full records.

Free

Free, open-source desktop GIS application that supports viewing, editing, and analysis of

  • Sold on a freemium model rather than quote.
On request

Geographic Information System Platform

  • No free tier, where Felt has one.
On request

Location Intelligence Platform

  • No free tier, where Felt has one.
  • 4 tiers to Felt's 3.
Free, then $20/month

Serverless Python for geospatial: write a UDF, get a map tile endpoint and an HTTP API

  • Publishes an entry price of $20/month, where Felt does not.
  • Sold on a Per month by compute tier model rather than quote.
  • 4 tiers to Felt's 3.

Long-running open source geospatial analysis engine for raster, vector and terrain processing

  • Sold on a Open source, no licence fee model rather than quote.
  • 1 tier to Felt's 3.
Free, then $149/month

Hosted 3D geospatial tiling and streaming, metered by storage, streaming and gigapixels

  • Publishes an entry price of $149/month, where Felt does not.
  • Sold on a Per month by storage, streaming and gigapixels model rather than quote.
  • 4 tiers to Felt's 3.

Every Felt alternative at a glance

A dash means the catalogue entry carries no figure, not that the answer is nothing.

Maps alternatives to Felt
ToolEntry priceModelTiersHead to head
Felt (this page)FreeQuote3
QGISIf you need real geoprocessing and analysis and can handle sharing separatelyFreeFreemium-vs Felt
Esri ArcGISIf you need an enterprise GIS with authoritative data management rather than a collaborative map editorOn requestQuote-vs Felt
CARTOIf your maps are driven from a cloud data warehouse and analysis matters more than collaborative editingOn requestQuote4vs Felt
FusedFree, then $20/monthPer month by compute tier4vs Felt
GRASS GISFreeOpen source, no licence fee1vs Felt
Cesium ionFree, then $149/monthPer month by storage, streaming and gigapixels4vs Felt
Google MapsFreeFree consumer app, funded by Google's advertising business1vs Felt
PotreeFreeOpen source, no licence fee1vs Felt
Emlid StudioFreeFree of charge, no licence fee1vs Felt
Atlas.coFree, then $23/monthPer user per month4vs Felt
LonboardFreeOpen source, no licence fee1vs Felt
SAGA GISFreeOpen source, no licence fee1vs Felt
Ride with GPSFreeFreemium, per user per month3vs Felt
ArcGIS Survey123On requestPer user per year by ArcGIS user type3vs Felt
Foursquare Spatial StudioOn requestQuote1vs Felt
Correlator3D$295/monthOne-time purchase5vs Felt
Leica InfinityOn requestQuote2vs Felt
Global Mapper$700/one-timeOne-time purchase4vs Felt
onX MapsOn requestSeparate per-product subscriptions, per user per year4vs Felt
Geographic CalculatorOn requestQuote3vs Felt
Agisoft Metashape$179/one-timeOne-time purchase3vs Felt
ArcGIS Field MapsOn requestIncluded with an ArcGIS user type licence3vs Felt

Ratings are aggregated from third-party sources and imported with each catalogue entry; Softwr hosts no reviews of these products. How each figure is used is set out on the Felt badges page.

Cheaper ways to solve the same problem

Free to start (11)

These publish a tier that costs nothing, so they can be evaluated before any money changes hands.

What you would be giving up

Felt is most often brought in for an environmental consultancy that needs a client to view and comment on survey results without installing gis software, a utility field crew collecting asset condition offline and syncing to the same map the office is looking at, a planning department sharing a proposal map with the public where the viewer count is unpredictable and viewer seats would be uncosted, a team of analysts who each hold data in different formats and want one map assembled in an afternoon rather than a week. Anything replacing it has to cover the ones you actually depend on, and a cheaper tool that misses one of them is not cheaper.

Two things this page cannot settle. It compares on price, model, tier count and rating, because those are the fields the category listing carries, feature-level differences need both full records, which is what the head-to-head pages load. And the ratings are third-party aggregates imported with each entry rather than reviews written here, so a 0.2 difference between two tools is noise rather than a finding.

If Felt is broadly right and the question is cost, the Felt pricing breakdown covers every tier and what each one adds. If you want the whole field rather than a shortlist, the Maps category lists everything the directory holds, and best maps tools ranks them.

Felt runs on web, ios, android. Platform coverage is not carried on the category listing for the alternatives, so it is one more thing to check on each head-to-head page rather than here.

Questions about Felt alternatives

What are the main alternatives to Felt?
22 other maps tools are listed in this directory, led by QGIS, Esri ArcGIS, CARTO, Fused. They are ordered by the aggregated rating on each catalogue entry, not by any Softwr ranking.
What is the best free alternative to Felt?
11 of the alternatives listed here can be used without paying: QGIS, Fused, GRASS GIS, Cesium ion, Google Maps.
Is there a reason to switch away from Felt?
Nothing in the data flags one. Felt has a free tier. Fit and workflow are the usual reasons to move, and those are not things this record can measure.
What would I give up by switching from Felt?
Felt is most often brought in for an environmental consultancy that needs a client to view and comment on survey results without installing gis software, a utility field crew collecting asset condition offline and syncing to the same map the office is looking at, a planning department sharing a proposal map with the public where the viewer count is unpredictable and viewer seats would be uncosted, a team of analysts who each hold data in different formats and want one map assembled in an afternoon rather than a week. Anything you replace it with has to cover the ones you actually rely on, the side-by-side comparisons linked from each alternative below put the two feature records against each other.
Is there an open-source alternative to Felt?
None of the maps tools listed here are recorded as open source. That is what the licence field on each entry says, and the field is not always filled in, so it is worth checking directly for any tool you are serious about.
How were these Felt alternatives chosen?
They are the tools filed in the same category, Maps, ordered by the aggregated rating on each entry. There is no editorial shortlist, and nothing on this page is paid: no sponsored placement runs on alternatives pages and the order cannot be bought. Softwr has not used these products.
Where can I compare Felt against one of these directly?
Every alternative below has a side-by-side page against Felt covering price, platforms, features and what each one is used for. Those pages read the full record for both products rather than the summary shown here.
Does this list cover every maps tool?
No. It covers what this directory holds in the Maps category, 22 tools beside Felt. The category page lists the rest of the catalogue as it grows.

Related pages