Maps · head to head
Felt vs HERE Technologies

Felt
Maps
Collaborative browser mapping with a free non-commercial tier and annual-only paid contracts
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

HERE Technologies
Maps
Location data and technology company that provides mapping and location services to businesses globally
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Felt felt publishes no prices for Professional or Enterprise, so buyers cannot compare against ArcGIS Online or QGIS with hosting without entering a sales process; HERE Technologies pricing is complex and unpredictable, with additional fees for common functionalities creating surprise costs at scale
- They diverge on capability: Felt covers Real-time collaboration, HERE Technologies covers Core Functionality.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Felt and HERE Technologies actually diverge.
| Attribute | Felt | HERE Technologies |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | quote | Unknown |
| Platforms | Web, iOS, Android | Web, iOS, Android, Cross-platform |
| Founded | Unknown | 1985 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Maps).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Felt
- Real-time collaboration
- Drag and drop data
- Unlimited viewers
- Field app with offline support
- Dashboards
- Live cloud sources
- API and SDK
Only in HERE Technologies
- Core Functionality
- User Interface
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Felt
- An environmental consultancy that needs a client to view and comment on survey results without installing GIS softwarenot HERE Technologies
- A utility field crew collecting asset condition offline and syncing to the same map the office is looking atnot HERE Technologies
- A planning department sharing a proposal map with the public where the viewer count is unpredictable and viewer seats would be uncostednot HERE Technologies
- A team of analysts who each hold data in different formats and want one map assembled in an afternoon rather than a weeknot HERE Technologies
HERE Technologies
- Map data for automated and assisted drivingnot Felt
- Connected driving, including hazard alerts and road surface analysisnot Felt
- Supply chain planning and logistics digital twinsnot Felt
- Geocoding, search and map rendering through hosted location servicesnot Felt
- Fleet tour planning and routing across 200 countriesnot Felt
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Felt
- Felt publishes no prices for Professional or Enterprise, so buyers cannot compare against ArcGIS Online or QGIS with hosting without entering a sales process
- Paid tiers are annual contract only with no monthly option, which excludes consultancies that need a tool for a single short engagement and forces them to the free non-commercial tier they are not licensed to use for client work
- The API, JavaScript SDK and live warehouse connections are enterprise-only, so a mid-sized team that wants programmatic access has to buy the top tier rather than pay for one capability
- Analytical depth is limited: there is no meaningful geoprocessing, topology checking or model building, so Felt sits beside a real GIS rather than replacing one
- The Professional tier caps data processing at 25 GB a month and map views at 100,000 a month, which are easy to exceed with raster imagery or a public-facing map, and the overage terms are not published either
HERE Technologies
- Pricing is complex and unpredictable, with additional fees for common functionalities creating surprise costs at scale
- Lack of transparency in cost projections makes budgeting and forecasting difficult
- Requires separate API keys and subscriptions for different feature categories, complicating integration
- Customer support quality and responsiveness is inconsistent compared to competitors like Google Maps
Pricing, plan by plan
Felt
Free- PersonalFree
- Free forever for non-commercial mapping
- Map creation, upload and sharing
- Not licensed for commercial use
- Professional$undefined/year
- 10 full-access seats with unlimited viewers
- 25 GB of data processing per month
- 100,000 map views per month
- Enterprise$undefined/year
- Live cloud sources including Postgres, Snowflake, BigQuery, Databricks and S3
- REST API and JavaScript SDK
- AI features
HERE Technologies
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the HERE Technologies review.
Which should you pick?
Choose Felt if
- You need real-time collaboration.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want drag and drop data.
Choose HERE Technologies if
- You need core functionality.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android, Cross-platform.
- You also want user interface.
Questions people ask
- Is Felt or HERE Technologies better?
- Neither clearly leads. Felt starts at Free and HERE Technologies at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Felt or HERE Technologies?
- Felt starts at Free and HERE Technologies at Free.
- Does Felt or HERE Technologies run on more platforms?
- Felt runs on Web, iOS, Android. HERE Technologies runs on Web, iOS, Android, Cross-platform.
- Can I use Felt for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Felt best used for?
- Felt is most often used for an environmental consultancy that needs a client to view and comment on survey results without installing gis software, a utility field crew collecting asset condition offline and syncing to the same map the office is looking at, a planning department sharing a proposal map with the public where the viewer count is unpredictable and viewer seats would be uncosted, a team of analysts who each hold data in different formats and want one map assembled in an afternoon rather than a week. Of those, an environmental consultancy that needs a client to view and comment on survey results without installing gis software and a utility field crew collecting asset condition offline and syncing to the same map the office is looking at are not what HERE Technologies is typically brought in for.
- What can Felt do that HERE Technologies cannot?
- Felt covers Real-time collaboration, Drag and drop data, Unlimited viewers, Field app with offline support. HERE Technologies covers Core Functionality, User Interface.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Felt: What does Felt cost?
Felt does not publish prices for Professional or Enterprise. Personal is free but licensed for non-commercial use only.
HERE Technologies: What does HERE Technologies provide?
HERE Technologies provides a comprehensive location platform including digital maps, routing and navigation APIs, geocoding, search, traffic, positioning, and telematics services for automotive, logistics, and enterprise applications.
SourceFelt: Can I pay monthly?
No. Paid plans are annual contracts. There is a 7 day trial of Professional.
HERE Technologies: Does HERE offer a free tier?
Yes. HERE provides a free tier with 30,000 map requests per month, 5,000 routing transactions, and 30,000 geocoding transactions. Usage beyond these limits is charged on a pay-as-you-go basis.
SourceFelt: Do viewers cost anything?
No. Viewer access is unlimited on the paid plans, which is the main reason organisations with large map audiences choose it.
HERE Technologies: What SDKs and APIs does HERE offer?
HERE provides REST APIs for maps, routing, geocoding, and search, plus SDKs for Android, iOS, Flutter, and JavaScript. The HERE SDK enables turn-by-turn navigation and location services for mobile and web applications.
SourceFelt: Is there a nonprofit discount?
Yes, 30 per cent for verified United States nonprofits, and free access for verified students and classrooms.
HERE Technologies: Is HERE's pricing transparent?
No. HERE uses a complex transaction-based pricing model with separate costs for different API categories. The pricing structure lacks transparency, making it difficult for customers to forecast costs at scale.
SourceHERE Technologies: How has HERE's pricing changed?
HERE moved to a simplified transaction-based pricing model with free monthly allowances for common APIs. Users pay per transaction beyond the free tier, though the structure has been criticized for complexity and lack of cost transparency.
SourceRelated pages
More on HERE Technologies
Other head to heads
- Felt vs Esri ArcGIS
- Felt vs CARTO
- Felt vs QGIS
- Felt vs Atlas.co
- Felt vs Global Mapper
- Felt vs GRASS GIS
- Felt vs onX Maps
- Felt vs Ride with GPS
- Felt vs SW Maps
- Felt vs TomTom Developer Portal
- Felt vs Kepler.gl
- Felt vs Trailforks
- Felt vs AllTrails
- Felt vs Bing Maps
- Felt vs Cesium ion
- Felt vs Citymapper
- Felt vs ArcGIS Survey123
- Felt vs ArcGIS Field Maps
- Felt vs LocationIQ
- Felt vs Mapzen
- Felt vs OsmAnd
- Felt vs Mapbox
- Felt vs Google Maps Platform
- Felt vs Apple Maps
- Felt vs Gaia GPS
- Felt vs Potree
- Felt vs WhiteboxTools
- Felt vs Agisoft Metashape
- HERE Technologies vs Esri ArcGIS
- HERE Technologies vs CARTO
- HERE Technologies vs QGIS
- HERE Technologies vs Atlas.co
- HERE Technologies vs Global Mapper
- HERE Technologies vs GRASS GIS
- HERE Technologies vs onX Maps
- HERE Technologies vs Ride with GPS
- HERE Technologies vs SW Maps
- HERE Technologies vs TomTom Developer Portal
- HERE Technologies vs Kepler.gl
- HERE Technologies vs Trailforks
- HERE Technologies vs AllTrails
- HERE Technologies vs Bing Maps
- HERE Technologies vs Cesium ion
- HERE Technologies vs Citymapper
- HERE Technologies vs ArcGIS Survey123
- HERE Technologies vs ArcGIS Field Maps
- HERE Technologies vs LocationIQ
- HERE Technologies vs Mapzen
- HERE Technologies vs OsmAnd
- HERE Technologies vs Mapbox
- HERE Technologies vs Google Maps Platform
- HERE Technologies vs Apple Maps
- HERE Technologies vs Gaia GPS
- HERE Technologies vs Potree
- HERE Technologies vs WhiteboxTools
- HERE Technologies vs Agisoft Metashape
