Maps · head to head
Apple Maps vs Felt

Apple Maps
Maps
Web mapping and navigation application developed by Apple Inc
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Felt
Maps
Collaborative browser mapping with a free non-commercial tier and annual-only paid contracts
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Felt has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Apple Maps live traffic updates, public transit info, and satellite view all require an active internet connection, offline mode (iOS 17+) is limited to pre-downloaded areas for driving, walking, cycling, and transit directions; Felt felt publishes no prices for Professional or Enterprise, so buyers cannot compare against ArcGIS Online or QGIS with hosting without entering a sales process
- They diverge on capability: Apple Maps covers Core Functionality, Felt covers Real-time collaboration.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Apple Maps and Felt actually diverge.
| Attribute | Apple Maps | Felt |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | On request | Free |
| Pricing model | freemium | quote |
| Free tier | No | Yes |
| Platforms | iOS, macOS, Web | Web, iOS, Android |
| Founded | 2012 | Unknown |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Maps).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Apple Maps
- Core Functionality
- User Interface
Only in Felt
- Real-time collaboration
- Drag and drop data
- Unlimited viewers
- Field app with offline support
- Dashboards
- Live cloud sources
- API and SDK
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Apple Maps
- Turn-by-turn driving, walking, and cycling navigationnot Felt
- Public transit directions with real-time schedules (subways, buses, trains, ferries)not Felt
- Offline turn-by-turn directions for pre-downloaded areas (iOS 17+)not Felt
- Augmented-reality immersive walking directions in supported citiesnot Felt
- Saving custom hiking/walking routes, including U.S. national park hikes, for offline accessnot Felt
Felt
- An environmental consultancy that needs a client to view and comment on survey results without installing GIS softwarenot Apple Maps
- A utility field crew collecting asset condition offline and syncing to the same map the office is looking atnot Apple Maps
- A planning department sharing a proposal map with the public where the viewer count is unpredictable and viewer seats would be uncostednot Apple Maps
- A team of analysts who each hold data in different formats and want one map assembled in an afternoon rather than a weeknot Apple Maps
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Apple Maps
- Live traffic updates, public transit info, and satellite view all require an active internet connection, offline mode (iOS 17+) is limited to pre-downloaded areas for driving, walking, cycling, and transit directions
- Apple Maps for the web is only in public beta, not a full-featured release
- Feature depth (e.g. immersive walking AR directions, detailed transit) is strongest on newer iPhones/iOS versions, leaving older devices with a reduced experience
Felt
- Felt publishes no prices for Professional or Enterprise, so buyers cannot compare against ArcGIS Online or QGIS with hosting without entering a sales process
- Paid tiers are annual contract only with no monthly option, which excludes consultancies that need a tool for a single short engagement and forces them to the free non-commercial tier they are not licensed to use for client work
- The API, JavaScript SDK and live warehouse connections are enterprise-only, so a mid-sized team that wants programmatic access has to buy the top tier rather than pay for one capability
- Analytical depth is limited: there is no meaningful geoprocessing, topology checking or model building, so Felt sits beside a real GIS rather than replacing one
- The Professional tier caps data processing at 25 GB a month and map views at 100,000 a month, which are easy to exceed with raster imagery or a public-facing map, and the overage terms are not published either
Pricing, plan by plan
Apple Maps
On requestNo published plan breakdown. See the Apple Maps review.
Felt
Free- PersonalFree
- Free forever for non-commercial mapping
- Map creation, upload and sharing
- Not licensed for commercial use
- Professional$undefined/year
- 10 full-access seats with unlimited viewers
- 25 GB of data processing per month
- 100,000 map views per month
- Enterprise$undefined/year
- Live cloud sources including Postgres, Snowflake, BigQuery, Databricks and S3
- REST API and JavaScript SDK
- AI features
Which should you pick?
Choose Apple Maps if
- You need core functionality.
- You work on iOS, macOS, Web.
- You also want user interface.
Choose Felt if
- You need real-time collaboration.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want drag and drop data.
Questions people ask
- Is Apple Maps or Felt better?
- Neither clearly leads. Apple Maps starts at On request and Felt at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Apple Maps or Felt?
- Felt has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at On request for Apple Maps and Free for Felt.
- Does Apple Maps or Felt run on more platforms?
- Apple Maps runs on iOS, macOS, Web. Felt runs on Web, iOS, Android.
- Can I use Felt for free?
- Yes. Felt has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Apple Maps starts at On request.
- What is Apple Maps best used for?
- Apple Maps is most often used for turn-by-turn driving, walking, and cycling navigation, public transit directions with real-time schedules (subways, buses, trains, ferries), offline turn-by-turn directions for pre-downloaded areas (ios 17+), augmented-reality immersive walking directions in supported cities. Of those, turn-by-turn driving, walking, and cycling navigation and public transit directions with real-time schedules (subways, buses, trains, ferries) are not what Felt is typically brought in for.
- What can Apple Maps do that Felt cannot?
- Apple Maps covers Core Functionality, User Interface. Felt covers Real-time collaboration, Drag and drop data, Unlimited viewers, Field app with offline support.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Apple Maps: Is there a cost to integrate Apple Maps into my app?
The Apple Maps pricing page does not disclose whether MapKit or MapKit JS integration is free or paid. You would need to consult Apple's developer documentation for current pricing and licensing terms.
SourceFelt: What does Felt cost?
Felt does not publish prices for Professional or Enterprise. Personal is free but licensed for non-commercial use only.
Apple Maps: What are the usage limits for Apple Maps integration?
The pricing page does not specify any rate limits, monthly minimums, or usage caps for MapKit or MapKit JS. This information is available in Apple's developer documentation.
SourceFelt: Can I pay monthly?
No. Paid plans are annual contracts. There is a 7 day trial of Professional.
Apple Maps: Are there different pricing tiers for MapKit and MapKit JS?
The Apple Maps page mentions MapKit for iOS, iPadOS, and macOS apps, and MapKit JS for websites, but does not provide pricing details or tier information for either option.
SourceFelt: Do viewers cost anything?
No. Viewer access is unlimited on the paid plans, which is the main reason organisations with large map audiences choose it.
Felt: Is there a nonprofit discount?
Yes, 30 per cent for verified United States nonprofits, and free access for verified students and classrooms.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Apple Maps vs MAPS.ME
- Apple Maps vs Navmii GPS
- Apple Maps vs OsmAnd
- Apple Maps vs HERE Technologies
- Apple Maps vs Esri ArcGIS
- Apple Maps vs deck.gl
- Apple Maps vs Bing Maps
- Apple Maps vs Citymapper
- Apple Maps vs GraphHopper
- Apple Maps vs MapQuest
- Apple Maps vs Mapzen
- Apple Maps vs TomTom
- Apple Maps vs Atlas.co
- Apple Maps vs Geographic Calculator
- Apple Maps vs Correlator3D
- Apple Maps vs Emlid Studio
- Apple Maps vs ArcGIS Field Maps
- Apple Maps vs CARTO
- Apple Maps vs QGIS
- Apple Maps vs Global Mapper
- Apple Maps vs GRASS GIS
- Apple Maps vs onX Maps
- Apple Maps vs Ride with GPS
- Apple Maps vs SW Maps
- Apple Maps vs TomTom Developer Portal
- Apple Maps vs Kepler.gl
- Apple Maps vs Trailforks
- Apple Maps vs AllTrails
- Apple Maps vs Cesium ion
- Apple Maps vs ArcGIS Survey123
- Felt vs MAPS.ME
- Felt vs Navmii GPS
- Felt vs OsmAnd
- Felt vs HERE Technologies
- Felt vs Esri ArcGIS
- Felt vs deck.gl
- Felt vs Bing Maps
- Felt vs Citymapper
- Felt vs GraphHopper
- Felt vs MapQuest
- Felt vs Mapzen
- Felt vs TomTom
- Felt vs Atlas.co
- Felt vs Geographic Calculator
- Felt vs Correlator3D
- Felt vs Emlid Studio
- Felt vs ArcGIS Field Maps
- Felt vs CARTO
- Felt vs QGIS
- Felt vs Global Mapper
- Felt vs GRASS GIS
- Felt vs onX Maps
- Felt vs Ride with GPS
- Felt vs SW Maps
- Felt vs TomTom Developer Portal
- Felt vs Kepler.gl
- Felt vs Trailforks
- Felt vs AllTrails
- Felt vs Cesium ion
- Felt vs ArcGIS Survey123
