Maps · head to head
Felt vs SAGA GIS

Felt
Maps
Collaborative browser mapping with a free non-commercial tier and annual-only paid contracts
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

SAGA GIS
Maps
Open source terrain and geoscientific analysis with no vendor and no support contract available
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Felt felt publishes no prices for Professional or Enterprise, so buyers cannot compare against ArcGIS Online or QGIS with hosting without entering a sales process; SAGA GIS there is no commercial support contract available from anyone, so a procurement process that requires a named supplier with a service level cannot be satisfied and the organisation carries the whole operational risk itself
- They diverge on capability: Felt covers Real-time collaboration, SAGA GIS covers Terrain morphometry.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Felt and SAGA GIS actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Maps).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Felt
- Real-time collaboration
- Drag and drop data
- Unlimited viewers
- Field app with offline support
- Dashboards
- Live cloud sources
- API and SDK
Only in SAGA GIS
- Terrain morphometry
- Hydrological modelling
- Geostatistics
- Image analysis
- Module library
- QGIS integration
- Python and R bindings
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Felt
- An environmental consultancy that needs a client to view and comment on survey results without installing GIS softwarenot SAGA GIS
- A utility field crew collecting asset condition offline and syncing to the same map the office is looking atnot SAGA GIS
- A planning department sharing a proposal map with the public where the viewer count is unpredictable and viewer seats would be uncostednot SAGA GIS
- A team of analysts who each hold data in different formats and want one map assembled in an afternoon rather than a weeknot SAGA GIS
SAGA GIS
- A hydrologist deriving catchment boundaries and flow networks from a national elevation model at a resolution commercial tools slow down onnot Felt
- A soil science team producing interpolated property surfaces with documented geostatistical methods for a peer-reviewed papernot Felt
- A government environmental analyst who needs a terrain index that no commercial GIS implements and does not want to write it from scratchnot Felt
- A QGIS user who has hit the limits of the native toolbox and needs the SAGA algorithms already exposed in the processing frameworknot Felt
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Felt
- Felt publishes no prices for Professional or Enterprise, so buyers cannot compare against ArcGIS Online or QGIS with hosting without entering a sales process
- Paid tiers are annual contract only with no monthly option, which excludes consultancies that need a tool for a single short engagement and forces them to the free non-commercial tier they are not licensed to use for client work
- The API, JavaScript SDK and live warehouse connections are enterprise-only, so a mid-sized team that wants programmatic access has to buy the top tier rather than pay for one capability
- Analytical depth is limited: there is no meaningful geoprocessing, topology checking or model building, so Felt sits beside a real GIS rather than replacing one
- The Professional tier caps data processing at 25 GB a month and map views at 100,000 a month, which are easy to exceed with raster imagery or a public-facing map, and the overage terms are not published either
SAGA GIS
- There is no commercial support contract available from anyone, so a procurement process that requires a named supplier with a service level cannot be satisfied and the organisation carries the whole operational risk itself
- The project explicitly states that everyone working on it has another job and that answers may take a while, which means an urgent production failure has no escalation path
- The interface is dated and inconsistent across modules, and cartographic output is poor, so most users treat it as an analysis engine and produce maps somewhere else
- Documentation for many of the several hundred modules is a parameter list without explanation of method or expected input, so choosing the right algorithm often requires reading the source or a published paper
- Development is concentrated in a small group, which creates real key-person risk: a change in the circumstances of a handful of maintainers would slow or stop releases, and there is no organisation obliged to continue them
Pricing, plan by plan
Felt
Free- PersonalFree
- Free forever for non-commercial mapping
- Map creation, upload and sharing
- Not licensed for commercial use
- Professional$undefined/year
- 10 full-access seats with unlimited viewers
- 25 GB of data processing per month
- 100,000 map views per month
- Enterprise$undefined/year
- Live cloud sources including Postgres, Snowflake, BigQuery, Databricks and S3
- REST API and JavaScript SDK
- AI features
SAGA GIS
Free- SAGA GISFree
- GNU General Public Licence
- No licence fee and no usage limits
- No commercial support contract exists
Which should you pick?
Choose Felt if
- You need real-time collaboration.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want drag and drop data.
Choose SAGA GIS if
- You need terrain morphometry.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Windows, Linux, macOS.
- You also want hydrological modelling.
Questions people ask
- Is Felt or SAGA GIS better?
- Neither clearly leads. Felt starts at Free and SAGA GIS at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Felt or SAGA GIS?
- Felt starts at Free and SAGA GIS at Free.
- Does Felt or SAGA GIS run on more platforms?
- Felt runs on Web, iOS, Android. SAGA GIS runs on Windows, Linux, macOS.
- Can I use Felt for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Felt best used for?
- Felt is most often used for an environmental consultancy that needs a client to view and comment on survey results without installing gis software, a utility field crew collecting asset condition offline and syncing to the same map the office is looking at, a planning department sharing a proposal map with the public where the viewer count is unpredictable and viewer seats would be uncosted, a team of analysts who each hold data in different formats and want one map assembled in an afternoon rather than a week. Of those, an environmental consultancy that needs a client to view and comment on survey results without installing gis software and a utility field crew collecting asset condition offline and syncing to the same map the office is looking at are not what SAGA GIS is typically brought in for.
- What can Felt do that SAGA GIS cannot?
- Felt covers Real-time collaboration, Drag and drop data, Unlimited viewers, Field app with offline support. SAGA GIS covers Terrain morphometry, Hydrological modelling, Geostatistics, Image analysis.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Felt: What does Felt cost?
Felt does not publish prices for Professional or Enterprise. Personal is free but licensed for non-commercial use only.
SAGA GIS: Who maintains SAGA GIS?
A small international developer community, originating from physical geography departments at the universities of Göttingen and Hamburg. It is hosted on SourceForge and releases continue in the 9.x line.
Felt: Can I pay monthly?
No. Paid plans are annual contracts. There is a 7 day trial of Professional.
SAGA GIS: Can I buy support?
No. There is no vendor and no commercial support contract. The project itself states there is no hotline and no guaranteed support.
Felt: Do viewers cost anything?
No. Viewer access is unlimited on the paid plans, which is the main reason organisations with large map audiences choose it.
SAGA GIS: Do I need SAGA if I already run QGIS?
Often not, because many SAGA algorithms are available through the QGIS processing toolbox. Install SAGA directly when you need modules QGIS does not expose or want to script them independently.
Felt: Is there a nonprofit discount?
Yes, 30 per cent for verified United States nonprofits, and free access for verified students and classrooms.
SAGA GIS: What licence is it under?
The GNU General Public Licence, so you can modify and redistribute it under the same terms.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Felt vs Esri ArcGIS
- Felt vs CARTO
- Felt vs QGIS
- Felt vs Atlas.co
- Felt vs Global Mapper
- Felt vs GRASS GIS
- Felt vs onX Maps
- Felt vs Ride with GPS
- Felt vs SW Maps
- Felt vs TomTom Developer Portal
- Felt vs Kepler.gl
- Felt vs Trailforks
- Felt vs AllTrails
- Felt vs Bing Maps
- Felt vs Cesium ion
- Felt vs Citymapper
- Felt vs ArcGIS Survey123
- Felt vs ArcGIS Field Maps
- Felt vs WhiteboxTools
- Felt vs Potree
- Felt vs Lonboard
- Felt vs CesiumJS
- Felt vs deck.gl
- Felt vs Leica Infinity
- Felt vs LocationIQ
- Felt vs Mapillary
- Felt vs MapQuest
- Felt vs MAPS.ME
- SAGA GIS vs Esri ArcGIS
- SAGA GIS vs CARTO
- SAGA GIS vs QGIS
- SAGA GIS vs Atlas.co
- SAGA GIS vs Global Mapper
- SAGA GIS vs GRASS GIS
- SAGA GIS vs onX Maps
- SAGA GIS vs Ride with GPS
- SAGA GIS vs SW Maps
- SAGA GIS vs TomTom Developer Portal
- SAGA GIS vs Kepler.gl
- SAGA GIS vs Trailforks
- SAGA GIS vs AllTrails
- SAGA GIS vs Bing Maps
- SAGA GIS vs Cesium ion
- SAGA GIS vs Citymapper
- SAGA GIS vs ArcGIS Survey123
- SAGA GIS vs ArcGIS Field Maps
- SAGA GIS vs WhiteboxTools
- SAGA GIS vs Potree
- SAGA GIS vs Lonboard
- SAGA GIS vs CesiumJS
- SAGA GIS vs deck.gl
- SAGA GIS vs Leica Infinity
- SAGA GIS vs LocationIQ
- SAGA GIS vs Mapillary
- SAGA GIS vs MapQuest
- SAGA GIS vs MAPS.ME
