Maps · head to head
Felt vs LocationIQ

Felt
Maps
Collaborative browser mapping with a free non-commercial tier and annual-only paid contracts
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Felt felt publishes no prices for Professional or Enterprise, so buyers cannot compare against ArcGIS Online or QGIS with hosting without entering a sales process; LocationIQ smaller ecosystem of integrations compared to Google Maps
- They diverge on capability: Felt covers Real-time collaboration, LocationIQ covers Core Functionality.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Felt and LocationIQ actually diverge.
| Attribute | Felt | LocationIQ |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | quote | subscription |
| Platforms | Web, iOS, Android | API |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Maps).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Felt
- Real-time collaboration
- Drag and drop data
- Unlimited viewers
- Field app with offline support
- Dashboards
- Live cloud sources
- API and SDK
Only in LocationIQ
- Core Functionality
- User Interface
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Felt
- An environmental consultancy that needs a client to view and comment on survey results without installing GIS softwarenot LocationIQ
- A utility field crew collecting asset condition offline and syncing to the same map the office is looking atnot LocationIQ
- A planning department sharing a proposal map with the public where the viewer count is unpredictable and viewer seats would be uncostednot LocationIQ
- A team of analysts who each hold data in different formats and want one map assembled in an afternoon rather than a weeknot LocationIQ
LocationIQ
- Geocoding and reverse geocoding addresses at scalenot Felt
- Store locators and address autofill in web and mobile appsnot Felt
- Asset and vehicle tracking with route optimisationnot Felt
- Serving static and dynamic map tilesnot Felt
- Distance matrix and route planningnot Felt
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Felt
- Felt publishes no prices for Professional or Enterprise, so buyers cannot compare against ArcGIS Online or QGIS with hosting without entering a sales process
- Paid tiers are annual contract only with no monthly option, which excludes consultancies that need a tool for a single short engagement and forces them to the free non-commercial tier they are not licensed to use for client work
- The API, JavaScript SDK and live warehouse connections are enterprise-only, so a mid-sized team that wants programmatic access has to buy the top tier rather than pay for one capability
- Analytical depth is limited: there is no meaningful geoprocessing, topology checking or model building, so Felt sits beside a real GIS rather than replacing one
- The Professional tier caps data processing at 25 GB a month and map views at 100,000 a month, which are easy to exceed with raster imagery or a public-facing map, and the overage terms are not published either
LocationIQ
- Smaller ecosystem of integrations compared to Google Maps
- Less documentation than industry-leading platforms
- Less brand recognition than Google or Mapbox
Pricing, plan by plan
Felt
Free- PersonalFree
- Free forever for non-commercial mapping
- Map creation, upload and sharing
- Not licensed for commercial use
- Professional$undefined/year
- 10 full-access seats with unlimited viewers
- 25 GB of data processing per month
- 100,000 map views per month
- Enterprise$undefined/year
- Live cloud sources including Postgres, Snowflake, BigQuery, Databricks and S3
- REST API and JavaScript SDK
- AI features
LocationIQ
Free- FreeFree
- 5,000 requests/day
- Limited commercial use with attribution
- Maps Lite$45/month
- 10,000 map views/day
- Geocoding APIs
- No routing
- Developer$100/month
- 25,000 requests/day
- All APIs (geocoding, routing, maps)
- Startup$200/month
- 60,000 requests/day
- Priority email support
Which should you pick?
Choose Felt if
- You need real-time collaboration.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want drag and drop data.
Choose LocationIQ if
- You need core functionality.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on API.
- You also want user interface.
Questions people ask
- Is Felt or LocationIQ better?
- Neither clearly leads. Felt starts at Free and LocationIQ at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Felt or LocationIQ?
- Felt starts at Free and LocationIQ at Free.
- Does Felt or LocationIQ run on more platforms?
- Felt runs on Web, iOS, Android. LocationIQ runs on API.
- Can I use Felt for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Felt best used for?
- Felt is most often used for an environmental consultancy that needs a client to view and comment on survey results without installing gis software, a utility field crew collecting asset condition offline and syncing to the same map the office is looking at, a planning department sharing a proposal map with the public where the viewer count is unpredictable and viewer seats would be uncosted, a team of analysts who each hold data in different formats and want one map assembled in an afternoon rather than a week. Of those, an environmental consultancy that needs a client to view and comment on survey results without installing gis software and a utility field crew collecting asset condition offline and syncing to the same map the office is looking at are not what LocationIQ is typically brought in for.
- What can Felt do that LocationIQ cannot?
- Felt covers Real-time collaboration, Drag and drop data, Unlimited viewers, Field app with offline support. LocationIQ covers Core Functionality, User Interface.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Felt: What does Felt cost?
Felt does not publish prices for Professional or Enterprise. Personal is free but licensed for non-commercial use only.
LocationIQ: How much does LocationIQ cost?
LocationIQ offers a Free plan with 5,000 requests/day, Maps Lite at $45/month for 10,000 map views/day, Developer at $100/month for 25,000 requests/day, and higher tiers up to Business Plus at $950/month for 30M requests/month. All plans are billed monthly with 2 months free for annual prepayment.
SourceFelt: Can I pay monthly?
No. Paid plans are annual contracts. There is a 7 day trial of Professional.
LocationIQ: Is LocationIQ free?
Yes, LocationIQ offers a free tier with 5,000 requests/day, providing access to geocoding and mapping APIs. Free tier users must include attribution and cannot use for commercial purposes.
SourceFelt: Do viewers cost anything?
No. Viewer access is unlimited on the paid plans, which is the main reason organisations with large map audiences choose it.
LocationIQ: What support levels does LocationIQ offer?
Free and early paid tiers receive best-effort email support. The Startup plan ($200/month) includes priority email support. Business Plus ($950/month) includes priority live chat support with dedicated AWS endpoints for improved performance.
SourceFelt: Is there a nonprofit discount?
Yes, 30 per cent for verified United States nonprofits, and free access for verified students and classrooms.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Felt vs Esri ArcGIS
- Felt vs CARTO
- Felt vs QGIS
- Felt vs Atlas.co
- Felt vs Global Mapper
- Felt vs GRASS GIS
- Felt vs onX Maps
- Felt vs Ride with GPS
- Felt vs SW Maps
- Felt vs TomTom Developer Portal
- Felt vs Kepler.gl
- Felt vs Trailforks
- Felt vs AllTrails
- Felt vs Bing Maps
- Felt vs Cesium ion
- Felt vs Citymapper
- Felt vs ArcGIS Survey123
- Felt vs ArcGIS Field Maps
- Felt vs Mapbox
- Felt vs HERE Technologies
- Felt vs Google Maps Platform
- Felt vs Geoapify
- Felt vs Stadia Maps
- Felt vs OpenRouteService
- Felt vs Radar
- Felt vs Mappedin
- Felt vs Nominatim
- Felt vs OsmAnd
- Felt vs Gaia GPS
- Felt vs GraphHopper
- Felt vs OSRM
- Felt vs Polaris Navigation GPS
- Felt vs PositionStack
- Felt vs SAGA GIS
- LocationIQ vs Esri ArcGIS
- LocationIQ vs CARTO
- LocationIQ vs QGIS
- LocationIQ vs Atlas.co
- LocationIQ vs Global Mapper
- LocationIQ vs GRASS GIS
- LocationIQ vs onX Maps
- LocationIQ vs Ride with GPS
- LocationIQ vs SW Maps
- LocationIQ vs TomTom Developer Portal
- LocationIQ vs Kepler.gl
- LocationIQ vs Trailforks
- LocationIQ vs AllTrails
- LocationIQ vs Bing Maps
- LocationIQ vs Cesium ion
- LocationIQ vs Citymapper
- LocationIQ vs ArcGIS Survey123
- LocationIQ vs ArcGIS Field Maps
- LocationIQ vs Mapbox
- LocationIQ vs HERE Technologies
- LocationIQ vs Google Maps Platform
- LocationIQ vs Geoapify
- LocationIQ vs Stadia Maps
- LocationIQ vs OpenRouteService
- LocationIQ vs Radar
- LocationIQ vs Mappedin
- LocationIQ vs Nominatim
- LocationIQ vs OsmAnd
- LocationIQ vs Gaia GPS
- LocationIQ vs GraphHopper
- LocationIQ vs OSRM
- LocationIQ vs Polaris Navigation GPS
- LocationIQ vs PositionStack
- LocationIQ vs SAGA GIS

