Maps · head to head
Felt vs Global Mapper

Felt
Maps
Collaborative browser mapping with a free non-commercial tier and annual-only paid contracts
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Global Mapper
Maps
A GIS and lidar desktop that still sells a genuine perpetual licence with published prices
- From
- $700/one-time
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Felt has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Felt felt publishes no prices for Professional or Enterprise, so buyers cannot compare against ArcGIS Online or QGIS with hosting without entering a sales process; Global Mapper it is Windows only with no macOS or Linux build, so mixed-platform teams end up running a virtual machine and lose graphics performance on large point clouds
- They diverge on capability: Felt covers Real-time collaboration, Global Mapper covers Format breadth.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Felt and Global Mapper actually diverge.
| Attribute | Felt | Global Mapper |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free | $700/one-time |
| Pricing model | quote | One-time purchase |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Platforms | Web, iOS, Android | Windows |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Maps).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Felt
- Real-time collaboration
- Drag and drop data
- Unlimited viewers
- Field app with offline support
- Dashboards
- Live cloud sources
- API and SDK
Only in Global Mapper
- Format breadth
- Lidar processing
- Pixels to Points
- Coordinate transformation
- Terrain analysis
- Scripting
- Mobile companion
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Felt
- An environmental consultancy that needs a client to view and comment on survey results without installing GIS softwarenot Global Mapper
- A utility field crew collecting asset condition offline and syncing to the same map the office is looking atnot Global Mapper
- A planning department sharing a proposal map with the public where the viewer count is unpredictable and viewer seats would be uncostednot Global Mapper
- A team of analysts who each hold data in different formats and want one map assembled in an afternoon rather than a weeknot Global Mapper
Global Mapper
- A survey office that receives lidar in a different format from every client and needs reliable conversion without writing scriptsnot Felt
- A consultancy that wants to classify ground points and extract building footprints from a drone survey without an Esri enterprise agreementnot Felt
- An organisation with an irregular workload that wants to buy the licence outright and skip maintenance in quiet yearsnot Felt
- A geologist producing volumes, contours and cross sections from terrain data on a standalone office workstationnot Felt
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Felt
- Felt publishes no prices for Professional or Enterprise, so buyers cannot compare against ArcGIS Online or QGIS with hosting without entering a sales process
- Paid tiers are annual contract only with no monthly option, which excludes consultancies that need a tool for a single short engagement and forces them to the free non-commercial tier they are not licensed to use for client work
- The API, JavaScript SDK and live warehouse connections are enterprise-only, so a mid-sized team that wants programmatic access has to buy the top tier rather than pay for one capability
- Analytical depth is limited: there is no meaningful geoprocessing, topology checking or model building, so Felt sits beside a real GIS rather than replacing one
- The Professional tier caps data processing at 25 GB a month and map views at 100,000 a month, which are easy to exceed with raster imagery or a public-facing map, and the overage terms are not published either
Global Mapper
- It is Windows only with no macOS or Linux build, so mixed-platform teams end up running a virtual machine and lose graphics performance on large point clouds
- The interface has grown by accretion over two decades and features are scattered across menus, so new users are slow to find capabilities that are already installed
- Node-locked perpetual licences are tied to the machine identifier, so a hardware refresh or a failed workstation means a support request rather than a login on a new device
- Multi-user and web publishing are weak relative to Esri or QGIS with a server stack, so it is a desktop analysis tool and not a platform for sharing data across an organisation
- Published prices apply to North America and differ elsewhere, so buyers outside that market must go through a reseller and cannot rely on the listed figures for budgeting
Pricing, plan by plan
Felt
Free- PersonalFree
- Free forever for non-commercial mapping
- Map creation, upload and sharing
- Not licensed for commercial use
- Professional$undefined/year
- 10 full-access seats with unlimited viewers
- 25 GB of data processing per month
- 100,000 map views per month
- Enterprise$undefined/year
- Live cloud sources including Postgres, Snowflake, BigQuery, Databricks and S3
- REST API and JavaScript SDK
- AI features
Global Mapper
$700/one-time- Global Mapper Standard, node-locked$700/one-time
- Perpetual licence tied to one machine
- First year of maintenance and support included
- Renewal 245 USD per year, optional
- Global Mapper Standard, floating or dongle$1050/one-time
- Shared between users or carried on a USB dongle
- Maintenance renewal 365 USD per year
- Network licence 2,100 USD with a two-seat minimum
- Global Mapper Pro, node-locked$1750/one-time
- Adds lidar classification, feature extraction and Pixels to Points
- Maintenance renewal 610 USD per year
- Upgrade from Standard version 26 costs 1,050 USD
- Global Mapper Pro, floating or dongle$2625/one-time
- Shared or dongle licence
- Maintenance renewal 915 USD per year
- Network licence 5,250 USD with a two-seat minimum
Which should you pick?
Choose Felt if
- You need real-time collaboration.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want drag and drop data.
Choose Global Mapper if
- You need format breadth.
- You work on Windows.
- You also want lidar processing.
Questions people ask
- Is Felt or Global Mapper better?
- Neither clearly leads. Felt starts at Free and Global Mapper at $700/one-time, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Felt or Global Mapper?
- Felt has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Felt and $700/one-time for Global Mapper.
- Does Felt or Global Mapper run on more platforms?
- Felt runs on Web, iOS, Android. Global Mapper runs on Windows.
- Can I use Felt for free?
- Yes. Felt has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Global Mapper starts at $700/one-time.
- What is Felt best used for?
- Felt is most often used for an environmental consultancy that needs a client to view and comment on survey results without installing gis software, a utility field crew collecting asset condition offline and syncing to the same map the office is looking at, a planning department sharing a proposal map with the public where the viewer count is unpredictable and viewer seats would be uncosted, a team of analysts who each hold data in different formats and want one map assembled in an afternoon rather than a week. Of those, an environmental consultancy that needs a client to view and comment on survey results without installing gis software and a utility field crew collecting asset condition offline and syncing to the same map the office is looking at are not what Global Mapper is typically brought in for.
- What can Felt do that Global Mapper cannot?
- Felt covers Real-time collaboration, Drag and drop data, Unlimited viewers, Field app with offline support. Global Mapper covers Format breadth, Lidar processing, Pixels to Points, Coordinate transformation.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Felt: What does Felt cost?
Felt does not publish prices for Professional or Enterprise. Personal is free but licensed for non-commercial use only.
Global Mapper: Is there still a perpetual licence?
Yes. Blue Marble sells perpetual node-locked, floating, dongle and network licences that keep working after maintenance lapses.
Felt: Can I pay monthly?
No. Paid plans are annual contracts. There is a 7 day trial of Professional.
Global Mapper: What is the difference between Standard and Pro?
Pro is an add-on to a matching Standard licence and carries the lidar classification, feature extraction, Pixels to Points photogrammetry and advanced terrain tools.
Felt: Do viewers cost anything?
No. Viewer access is unlimited on the paid plans, which is the main reason organisations with large map audiences choose it.
Global Mapper: Do I have to pay maintenance?
Only for the first year, which is included. After that it is optional; without it the software continues to run but you receive no upgrades or support.
Felt: Is there a nonprofit discount?
Yes, 30 per cent for verified United States nonprofits, and free access for verified students and classrooms.
Global Mapper: Can it replace ArcGIS?
For desktop format conversion, lidar and terrain analysis, often yes. For enterprise data management, web services and organisation-wide sharing, no.
Related pages
More on Global Mapper
Other head to heads
- Felt vs Esri ArcGIS
- Felt vs CARTO
- Felt vs QGIS
- Felt vs Atlas.co
- Felt vs GRASS GIS
- Felt vs onX Maps
- Felt vs Ride with GPS
- Felt vs SW Maps
- Felt vs TomTom Developer Portal
- Felt vs Kepler.gl
- Felt vs Trailforks
- Felt vs AllTrails
- Felt vs Bing Maps
- Felt vs Cesium ion
- Felt vs Citymapper
- Felt vs ArcGIS Survey123
- Felt vs ArcGIS Field Maps
- Felt vs SAGA GIS
- Felt vs Emlid Studio
- Felt vs WhiteboxTools
- Felt vs Potree
- Felt vs Agisoft Metashape
- Felt vs Leica Infinity
- Felt vs GraphHopper
- Felt vs HERE WeGo
- Felt vs IndoorAtlas
- Felt vs Mappedin
- Felt vs MapTiler
- Global Mapper vs Esri ArcGIS
- Global Mapper vs CARTO
- Global Mapper vs QGIS
- Global Mapper vs Atlas.co
- Global Mapper vs GRASS GIS
- Global Mapper vs onX Maps
- Global Mapper vs Ride with GPS
- Global Mapper vs SW Maps
- Global Mapper vs TomTom Developer Portal
- Global Mapper vs Kepler.gl
- Global Mapper vs Trailforks
- Global Mapper vs AllTrails
- Global Mapper vs Bing Maps
- Global Mapper vs Cesium ion
- Global Mapper vs Citymapper
- Global Mapper vs ArcGIS Survey123
- Global Mapper vs ArcGIS Field Maps
- Global Mapper vs SAGA GIS
- Global Mapper vs Emlid Studio
- Global Mapper vs WhiteboxTools
- Global Mapper vs Potree
- Global Mapper vs Agisoft Metashape
- Global Mapper vs Leica Infinity
- Global Mapper vs GraphHopper
- Global Mapper vs HERE WeGo
- Global Mapper vs IndoorAtlas
- Global Mapper vs Mappedin
- Global Mapper vs MapTiler
