Maps · head to head
Felt vs TomTom Developer Portal

Felt
Maps
Collaborative browser mapping with a free non-commercial tier and annual-only paid contracts
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
TomTom Developer Portal
Maps
TomTom provides mapping and traffic APIs, SDKs, and data products for developers
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Felt has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Felt felt publishes no prices for Professional or Enterprise, so buyers cannot compare against ArcGIS Online or QGIS with hosting without entering a sales process; TomTom Developer Portal default rate limits on self-serve plans are modest at approximately 5 requests per second; higher limits require contracts
- They diverge on capability: Felt covers Real-time collaboration, TomTom Developer Portal covers Core Functionality.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Felt and TomTom Developer Portal actually diverge.
| Attribute | Felt | TomTom Developer Portal |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free | On request |
| Pricing model | quote | freemium |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
Identical on both: platforms (Web, iOS, Android), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Maps).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Felt
- Real-time collaboration
- Drag and drop data
- Unlimited viewers
- Field app with offline support
- Dashboards
- Live cloud sources
- API and SDK
Only in TomTom Developer Portal
- Core Functionality
- User Interface
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Felt
- An environmental consultancy that needs a client to view and comment on survey results without installing GIS softwarenot TomTom Developer Portal
- A utility field crew collecting asset condition offline and syncing to the same map the office is looking atnot TomTom Developer Portal
- A planning department sharing a proposal map with the public where the viewer count is unpredictable and viewer seats would be uncostednot TomTom Developer Portal
- A team of analysts who each hold data in different formats and want one map assembled in an afternoon rather than a weeknot TomTom Developer Portal
TomTom Developer Portal
No use cases recorded yet. See the TomTom Developer Portal review.
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Felt
- Felt publishes no prices for Professional or Enterprise, so buyers cannot compare against ArcGIS Online or QGIS with hosting without entering a sales process
- Paid tiers are annual contract only with no monthly option, which excludes consultancies that need a tool for a single short engagement and forces them to the free non-commercial tier they are not licensed to use for client work
- The API, JavaScript SDK and live warehouse connections are enterprise-only, so a mid-sized team that wants programmatic access has to buy the top tier rather than pay for one capability
- Analytical depth is limited: there is no meaningful geoprocessing, topology checking or model building, so Felt sits beside a real GIS rather than replacing one
- The Professional tier caps data processing at 25 GB a month and map views at 100,000 a month, which are easy to exceed with raster imagery or a public-facing map, and the overage terms are not published either
TomTom Developer Portal
- Default rate limits on self-serve plans are modest at approximately 5 requests per second; higher limits require contracts
- Limited POI rich media compared to Google Places; no reviews, photos, or user-generated content
- Smaller developer community with fewer tutorials and Stack Overflow answers than Google or Mapbox
- No official Flutter SDK; developers must use third-party plugins for Flutter integration
- Maps SDK for Web v6 deprecated as of February 2026 with migration required to newer SDK
Pricing, plan by plan
Felt
Free- PersonalFree
- Free forever for non-commercial mapping
- Map creation, upload and sharing
- Not licensed for commercial use
- Professional$undefined/year
- 10 full-access seats with unlimited viewers
- 25 GB of data processing per month
- 100,000 map views per month
- Enterprise$undefined/year
- Live cloud sources including Postgres, Snowflake, BigQuery, Databricks and S3
- REST API and JavaScript SDK
- AI features
TomTom Developer Portal
On requestNo published plan breakdown. See the TomTom Developer Portal review.
Which should you pick?
Choose Felt if
- You need real-time collaboration.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want drag and drop data.
Choose TomTom Developer Portal if
- You need core functionality.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want user interface.
Questions people ask
- Is Felt or TomTom Developer Portal better?
- Neither clearly leads. Felt starts at Free and TomTom Developer Portal at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Felt or TomTom Developer Portal?
- Felt has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Felt and On request for TomTom Developer Portal.
- Does Felt or TomTom Developer Portal run on more platforms?
- Both run on Web, iOS, Android, so platform support will not decide this one for you.
- Can I use Felt for free?
- Yes. Felt has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. TomTom Developer Portal starts at On request.
- What is Felt best used for?
- Felt is most often used for an environmental consultancy that needs a client to view and comment on survey results without installing gis software, a utility field crew collecting asset condition offline and syncing to the same map the office is looking at, a planning department sharing a proposal map with the public where the viewer count is unpredictable and viewer seats would be uncosted, a team of analysts who each hold data in different formats and want one map assembled in an afternoon rather than a week. Of those, an environmental consultancy that needs a client to view and comment on survey results without installing gis software and a utility field crew collecting asset condition offline and syncing to the same map the office is looking at are not what TomTom Developer Portal is typically brought in for.
- What can Felt do that TomTom Developer Portal cannot?
- Felt covers Real-time collaboration, Drag and drop data, Unlimited viewers, Field app with offline support. TomTom Developer Portal covers Core Functionality, User Interface.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Felt: What does Felt cost?
Felt does not publish prices for Professional or Enterprise. Personal is free but licensed for non-commercial use only.
TomTom Developer Portal: Does TomTom Developer Portal have a free tier?
Yes. TomTom offers a freemium plan with 50,000 tile requests plus 2,500 non-tile requests daily at no cost with no credit card required, and commercial use is permitted.
SourceFelt: Can I pay monthly?
No. Paid plans are annual contracts. There is a 7 day trial of Professional.
TomTom Developer Portal: What APIs does TomTom provide?
TomTom provides REST APIs for Maps (display raster or vector maps), Navigation (routing and turn-by-turn), Places (geocoding and POI search), and Traffic (real-time flow and incidents), plus JavaScript SDK and mobile SDKs.
SourceFelt: Do viewers cost anything?
No. Viewer access is unlimited on the paid plans, which is the main reason organisations with large map audiences choose it.
TomTom Developer Portal: What JavaScript SDKs are available?
TomTom provides Maps SDK for JavaScript with TypeScript support, a Services library as a wrapper for REST APIs, and mobile integration through NativeScript WebView for iOS and Android.
Felt: Is there a nonprofit discount?
Yes, 30 per cent for verified United States nonprofits, and free access for verified students and classrooms.
Related pages
More on TomTom Developer Portal
Other head to heads
- Felt vs Esri ArcGIS
- Felt vs CARTO
- Felt vs QGIS
- Felt vs Atlas.co
- Felt vs Global Mapper
- Felt vs GRASS GIS
- Felt vs onX Maps
- Felt vs Ride with GPS
- Felt vs SW Maps
- Felt vs Kepler.gl
- Felt vs Trailforks
- Felt vs AllTrails
- Felt vs Bing Maps
- Felt vs Cesium ion
- Felt vs Citymapper
- Felt vs ArcGIS Survey123
- Felt vs ArcGIS Field Maps
- Felt vs Mapbox
- Felt vs Google Maps Platform
- Felt vs HERE Technologies
- Felt vs Geoapify
- Felt vs Waze
- Felt vs Mappedin
- Felt vs MapTiler
- Felt vs Gaia GPS
- Felt vs GraphHopper
- Felt vs IndoorAtlas
- Felt vs HERE WeGo
- TomTom Developer Portal vs Esri ArcGIS
- TomTom Developer Portal vs CARTO
- TomTom Developer Portal vs QGIS
- TomTom Developer Portal vs Atlas.co
- TomTom Developer Portal vs Global Mapper
- TomTom Developer Portal vs GRASS GIS
- TomTom Developer Portal vs onX Maps
- TomTom Developer Portal vs Ride with GPS
- TomTom Developer Portal vs SW Maps
- TomTom Developer Portal vs Kepler.gl
- TomTom Developer Portal vs Trailforks
- TomTom Developer Portal vs AllTrails
- TomTom Developer Portal vs Bing Maps
- TomTom Developer Portal vs Cesium ion
- TomTom Developer Portal vs Citymapper
- TomTom Developer Portal vs ArcGIS Survey123
- TomTom Developer Portal vs ArcGIS Field Maps
- TomTom Developer Portal vs Mapbox
- TomTom Developer Portal vs Google Maps Platform
- TomTom Developer Portal vs HERE Technologies
- TomTom Developer Portal vs Geoapify
- TomTom Developer Portal vs Waze
- TomTom Developer Portal vs Mappedin
- TomTom Developer Portal vs MapTiler
- TomTom Developer Portal vs Gaia GPS
- TomTom Developer Portal vs GraphHopper
- TomTom Developer Portal vs IndoorAtlas
- TomTom Developer Portal vs HERE WeGo
