Maps · head to head
Felt vs PositionStack

Felt
Maps
Collaborative browser mapping with a free non-commercial tier and annual-only paid contracts
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

PositionStack
Maps
Free, developer-friendly geocoding API for forward and reverse geocoding with global coverage
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Felt has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Felt felt publishes no prices for Professional or Enterprise, so buyers cannot compare against ArcGIS Online or QGIS with hosting without entering a sales process; PositionStack the free plan allows only 100 requests per month
- They diverge on capability: Felt covers Real-time collaboration, PositionStack covers Core Functionality.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Felt and PositionStack actually diverge.
| Attribute | Felt | PositionStack |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free | On request |
| Pricing model | quote | Unknown |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Platforms | Web, iOS, Android | Web |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Maps).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Felt
- Real-time collaboration
- Drag and drop data
- Unlimited viewers
- Field app with offline support
- Dashboards
- Live cloud sources
- API and SDK
Only in PositionStack
- Core Functionality
- User Interface
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Felt
- An environmental consultancy that needs a client to view and comment on survey results without installing GIS softwarenot PositionStack
- A utility field crew collecting asset condition offline and syncing to the same map the office is looking atnot PositionStack
- A planning department sharing a proposal map with the public where the viewer count is unpredictable and viewer seats would be uncostednot PositionStack
- A team of analysts who each hold data in different formats and want one map assembled in an afternoon rather than a weeknot PositionStack
PositionStack
- Forward geocoding addresses to coordinates via REST APInot Felt
- Reverse geocoding coordinates to addressesnot Felt
- Batch geocoding location data in a backend servicenot Felt
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Felt
- Felt publishes no prices for Professional or Enterprise, so buyers cannot compare against ArcGIS Online or QGIS with hosting without entering a sales process
- Paid tiers are annual contract only with no monthly option, which excludes consultancies that need a tool for a single short engagement and forces them to the free non-commercial tier they are not licensed to use for client work
- The API, JavaScript SDK and live warehouse connections are enterprise-only, so a mid-sized team that wants programmatic access has to buy the top tier rather than pay for one capability
- Analytical depth is limited: there is no meaningful geoprocessing, topology checking or model building, so Felt sits beside a real GIS rather than replacing one
- The Professional tier caps data processing at 25 GB a month and map views at 100,000 a month, which are easy to exceed with raster imagery or a public-facing map, and the overage terms are not published either
PositionStack
- The free plan allows only 100 requests per month
- The free plan is a personal licence, so commercial use requires a paid plan
- The free plan is rate limited, with an extended rate limit only from the Basic plan up
- Requests beyond the monthly quota are billed as overage, at $0.0003996 per request on Basic
- The lowest advertised rates require annual prepayment
- Enterprise volumes are priced by quote with no published rate
Pricing, plan by plan
Felt
Free- PersonalFree
- Free forever for non-commercial mapping
- Map creation, upload and sharing
- Not licensed for commercial use
- Professional$undefined/year
- 10 full-access seats with unlimited viewers
- 25 GB of data processing per month
- 100,000 map views per month
- Enterprise$undefined/year
- Live cloud sources including Postgres, Snowflake, BigQuery, Databricks and S3
- REST API and JavaScript SDK
- AI features
PositionStack
On requestNo published plan breakdown. See the PositionStack review.
Which should you pick?
Choose Felt if
- You need real-time collaboration.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want drag and drop data.
Choose PositionStack if
- You need core functionality.
- You also want user interface.
Questions people ask
- Is Felt or PositionStack better?
- Neither clearly leads. Felt starts at Free and PositionStack at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Felt or PositionStack?
- Felt has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Felt and On request for PositionStack.
- Does Felt or PositionStack run on more platforms?
- Felt runs on Web, iOS, Android. PositionStack runs on Web.
- Can I use Felt for free?
- Yes. Felt has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. PositionStack starts at On request.
- What is Felt best used for?
- Felt is most often used for an environmental consultancy that needs a client to view and comment on survey results without installing gis software, a utility field crew collecting asset condition offline and syncing to the same map the office is looking at, a planning department sharing a proposal map with the public where the viewer count is unpredictable and viewer seats would be uncosted, a team of analysts who each hold data in different formats and want one map assembled in an afternoon rather than a week. Of those, an environmental consultancy that needs a client to view and comment on survey results without installing gis software and a utility field crew collecting asset condition offline and syncing to the same map the office is looking at are not what PositionStack is typically brought in for.
- What can Felt do that PositionStack cannot?
- Felt covers Real-time collaboration, Drag and drop data, Unlimited viewers, Field app with offline support. PositionStack covers Core Functionality, User Interface.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Felt: What does Felt cost?
Felt does not publish prices for Professional or Enterprise. Personal is free but licensed for non-commercial use only.
PositionStack: What annual billing discount does Positionstack offer?
Annual billing provides up to 15% discount compared to monthly billing total. For example, Basic annual is $8.99/month vs $9.99/month monthly, and Professional annual is $43.99/month vs $49.99/month monthly. Source: https://positionstack.com/pricing
SourceFelt: Can I pay monthly?
No. Paid plans are annual contracts. There is a 7 day trial of Professional.
PositionStack: How do Positionstack overage notifications work?
Positionstack sends alerts at 75%, 90%, and 100% of your monthly request allowance. Overages are calculated at month-end and charged according to each tier's per-request rate (e.g., Business tier: $0.00013332/request). Source: https://positionstack.com/pricing
SourceFelt: Do viewers cost anything?
No. Viewer access is unlimited on the paid plans, which is the main reason organisations with large map audiences choose it.
PositionStack: What payment methods does Positionstack accept?
Positionstack accepts Visa, MasterCard, Discover, American Express, Diner's Club for monthly billing. Enterprise customers may arrange bank transfers for their custom agreements. Source: https://positionstack.com/pricing
SourceFelt: Is there a nonprofit discount?
Yes, 30 per cent for verified United States nonprofits, and free access for verified students and classrooms.
PositionStack: Can I downgrade or cancel my Positionstack plan?
Downgrades take effect at your billing cycle end. Cancellations require contacting customer service. Uptime guarantee is 99.9% average over 12 months. Source: https://positionstack.com/pricing
SourceRelated pages
More on PositionStack
Other head to heads
- Felt vs Esri ArcGIS
- Felt vs CARTO
- Felt vs QGIS
- Felt vs Atlas.co
- Felt vs Global Mapper
- Felt vs GRASS GIS
- Felt vs onX Maps
- Felt vs Ride with GPS
- Felt vs SW Maps
- Felt vs TomTom Developer Portal
- Felt vs Kepler.gl
- Felt vs Trailforks
- Felt vs AllTrails
- Felt vs Bing Maps
- Felt vs Cesium ion
- Felt vs Citymapper
- Felt vs ArcGIS Survey123
- Felt vs ArcGIS Field Maps
- Felt vs Mapbox
- Felt vs Google Maps Platform
- Felt vs HERE Technologies
- Felt vs Apple Maps
- Felt vs LocationIQ
- Felt vs Nominatim
- Felt vs Stadia Maps
- Felt vs Leaflet
- Felt vs CesiumJS
- Felt vs Gaia GPS
- Felt vs Agisoft Metashape
- Felt vs Correlator3D
- Felt vs Emlid Studio
- Felt vs Geographic Calculator
- PositionStack vs Esri ArcGIS
- PositionStack vs CARTO
- PositionStack vs QGIS
- PositionStack vs Atlas.co
- PositionStack vs Global Mapper
- PositionStack vs GRASS GIS
- PositionStack vs onX Maps
- PositionStack vs Ride with GPS
- PositionStack vs SW Maps
- PositionStack vs TomTom Developer Portal
- PositionStack vs Kepler.gl
- PositionStack vs Trailforks
- PositionStack vs AllTrails
- PositionStack vs Bing Maps
- PositionStack vs Cesium ion
- PositionStack vs Citymapper
- PositionStack vs ArcGIS Survey123
- PositionStack vs ArcGIS Field Maps
- PositionStack vs Mapbox
- PositionStack vs Google Maps Platform
- PositionStack vs HERE Technologies
- PositionStack vs Apple Maps
- PositionStack vs LocationIQ
- PositionStack vs Nominatim
- PositionStack vs Stadia Maps
- PositionStack vs Leaflet
- PositionStack vs CesiumJS
- PositionStack vs Gaia GPS
- PositionStack vs Agisoft Metashape
- PositionStack vs Correlator3D
- PositionStack vs Emlid Studio
- PositionStack vs Geographic Calculator
