Maps · head to head
Felt vs Radar

Felt
Maps
Collaborative browser mapping with a free non-commercial tier and annual-only paid contracts
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Radar
Maps
Geofencing, trip tracking, and location-based search APIs that power location features in
- From
- $0.02/per monthly tracked user
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Felt has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Felt felt publishes no prices for Professional or Enterprise, so buyers cannot compare against ArcGIS Online or QGIS with hosting without entering a sales process; Radar no free tier available
- They diverge on capability: Felt covers Real-time collaboration, Radar covers Core Functionality.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Felt and Radar actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Maps).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Felt
- Real-time collaboration
- Drag and drop data
- Unlimited viewers
- Field app with offline support
- Dashboards
- Live cloud sources
- API and SDK
Only in Radar
- Core Functionality
- User Interface
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Felt
- An environmental consultancy that needs a client to view and comment on survey results without installing GIS softwarenot Radar
- A utility field crew collecting asset condition offline and syncing to the same map the office is looking atnot Radar
- A planning department sharing a proposal map with the public where the viewer count is unpredictable and viewer seats would be uncostednot Radar
- A team of analysts who each hold data in different formats and want one map assembled in an afternoon rather than a weeknot Radar
Radar
- Detecting and preventing fraud with geolocation verificationnot Felt
- Tracking pickups and deliveries in real-time with geofencingnot Felt
- Engaging customers with location-based marketing campaignsnot Felt
- Managing geographic compliance and hyper-accurate location trackingnot Felt
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Felt
- Felt publishes no prices for Professional or Enterprise, so buyers cannot compare against ArcGIS Online or QGIS with hosting without entering a sales process
- Paid tiers are annual contract only with no monthly option, which excludes consultancies that need a tool for a single short engagement and forces them to the free non-commercial tier they are not licensed to use for client work
- The API, JavaScript SDK and live warehouse connections are enterprise-only, so a mid-sized team that wants programmatic access has to buy the top tier rather than pay for one capability
- Analytical depth is limited: there is no meaningful geoprocessing, topology checking or model building, so Felt sits beside a real GIS rather than replacing one
- The Professional tier caps data processing at 25 GB a month and map views at 100,000 a month, which are easy to exceed with raster imagery or a public-facing map, and the overage terms are not published either
Radar
- No free tier available
- Annual contracts required with committed monthly quotas
- Volume discounts applied manually; no public discount tiers
Pricing, plan by plan
Felt
Free- PersonalFree
- Free forever for non-commercial mapping
- Map creation, upload and sharing
- Not licensed for commercial use
- Professional$undefined/year
- 10 full-access seats with unlimited viewers
- 25 GB of data processing per month
- 100,000 map views per month
- Enterprise$undefined/year
- Live cloud sources including Postgres, Snowflake, BigQuery, Databricks and S3
- REST API and JavaScript SDK
- AI features
Radar
$0.02/per monthly tracked userNo published plan breakdown. See the Radar review.
Which should you pick?
Choose Felt if
- You need real-time collaboration.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want drag and drop data.
Choose Radar if
- You need core functionality.
- You work on iOS, Android, Web.
- You also want user interface.
Questions people ask
- Is Felt or Radar better?
- Neither clearly leads. Felt starts at Free and Radar at $0.02/per monthly tracked user, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Felt or Radar?
- Felt has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Felt and $0.02/per monthly tracked user for Radar.
- Does Felt or Radar run on more platforms?
- Felt runs on Web, iOS, Android. Radar runs on iOS, Android, Web.
- Can I use Felt for free?
- Yes. Felt has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Radar starts at $0.02/per monthly tracked user.
- What is Felt best used for?
- Felt is most often used for an environmental consultancy that needs a client to view and comment on survey results without installing gis software, a utility field crew collecting asset condition offline and syncing to the same map the office is looking at, a planning department sharing a proposal map with the public where the viewer count is unpredictable and viewer seats would be uncosted, a team of analysts who each hold data in different formats and want one map assembled in an afternoon rather than a week. Of those, an environmental consultancy that needs a client to view and comment on survey results without installing gis software and a utility field crew collecting asset condition offline and syncing to the same map the office is looking at are not what Radar is typically brought in for.
- What can Felt do that Radar cannot?
- Felt covers Real-time collaboration, Drag and drop data, Unlimited viewers, Field app with offline support. Radar covers Core Functionality, User Interface.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Felt: What does Felt cost?
Felt does not publish prices for Professional or Enterprise. Personal is free but licensed for non-commercial use only.
Radar: What is Radar's core function?
Radar is an all-in-one location platform providing SDKs and APIs for geofencing, trip tracking, geocoding, and location search. It handles 100+ billion annual queries from 100+ million devices.
SourceFelt: Can I pay monthly?
No. Paid plans are annual contracts. There is a 7 day trial of Professional.
Radar: Who uses Radar?
Companies like Sleeper, Panera, DICK's Sporting Goods, T-Mobile, and Zillow use Radar's geofencing SDKs and maps APIs for location-based solutions.
SourceFelt: Do viewers cost anything?
No. Viewer access is unlimited on the paid plans, which is the main reason organisations with large map audiences choose it.
Radar: How is Radar's pricing structured?
Radar does not publicly disclose pricing. Custom quotes are required based on usage and requirements, meaning pricing varies per customer.
SourceFelt: Is there a nonprofit discount?
Yes, 30 per cent for verified United States nonprofits, and free access for verified students and classrooms.
Radar: What are Radar's security and privacy features?
Radar prioritizes enterprise-level security, privacy, and customer support. It maintains high uptime, low latency connections for reliable monitoring of location data across platforms.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Felt vs Esri ArcGIS
- Felt vs CARTO
- Felt vs QGIS
- Felt vs Atlas.co
- Felt vs Global Mapper
- Felt vs GRASS GIS
- Felt vs onX Maps
- Felt vs Ride with GPS
- Felt vs SW Maps
- Felt vs TomTom Developer Portal
- Felt vs Kepler.gl
- Felt vs Trailforks
- Felt vs AllTrails
- Felt vs Bing Maps
- Felt vs Cesium ion
- Felt vs Citymapper
- Felt vs ArcGIS Survey123
- Felt vs ArcGIS Field Maps
- Felt vs Mapbox
- Felt vs Google Maps Platform
- Felt vs LocationIQ
- Felt vs Geoapify
- Felt vs Mappedin
- Felt vs OpenRouteService
- Felt vs Stadia Maps
- Felt vs HERE Technologies
- Felt vs Foursquare Places API
- Felt vs Foursquare Spatial Studio
- Felt vs Fused
- Felt vs Google Maps
- Radar vs Esri ArcGIS
- Radar vs CARTO
- Radar vs QGIS
- Radar vs Atlas.co
- Radar vs Global Mapper
- Radar vs GRASS GIS
- Radar vs onX Maps
- Radar vs Ride with GPS
- Radar vs SW Maps
- Radar vs TomTom Developer Portal
- Radar vs Kepler.gl
- Radar vs Trailforks
- Radar vs AllTrails
- Radar vs Bing Maps
- Radar vs Cesium ion
- Radar vs Citymapper
- Radar vs ArcGIS Survey123
- Radar vs ArcGIS Field Maps
- Radar vs Mapbox
- Radar vs Google Maps Platform
- Radar vs LocationIQ
- Radar vs Geoapify
- Radar vs Mappedin
- Radar vs OpenRouteService
- Radar vs Stadia Maps
- Radar vs HERE Technologies
- Radar vs Foursquare Places API
- Radar vs Foursquare Spatial Studio
- Radar vs Fused
- Radar vs Google Maps
