Maps · head to head
Felt vs MapTiler

Felt
Maps
Collaborative browser mapping with a free non-commercial tier and annual-only paid contracts
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

MapTiler
Maps
Map hosting, styling, and APIs for developers with beautiful pre-built map styles
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Felt felt publishes no prices for Professional or Enterprise, so buyers cannot compare against ArcGIS Online or QGIS with hosting without entering a sales process; MapTiler the free tier is restricted to testing, personal or non commercial use and forces a MapTiler logo on the map
- They diverge on capability: Felt covers Real-time collaboration, MapTiler covers Core Functionality.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Felt and MapTiler actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Maps).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Felt
- Real-time collaboration
- Drag and drop data
- Unlimited viewers
- Field app with offline support
- Dashboards
- Live cloud sources
- API and SDK
Only in MapTiler
- Core Functionality
- User Interface
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Felt
- An environmental consultancy that needs a client to view and comment on survey results without installing GIS softwarenot MapTiler
- A utility field crew collecting asset condition offline and syncing to the same map the office is looking atnot MapTiler
- A planning department sharing a proposal map with the public where the viewer count is unpredictable and viewer seats would be uncostednot MapTiler
- A team of analysts who each hold data in different formats and want one map assembled in an afternoon rather than a weeknot MapTiler
MapTiler
- Web and mobile mapping applicationsnot Felt
- Vector tile and raster map hostingnot Felt
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Felt
- Felt publishes no prices for Professional or Enterprise, so buyers cannot compare against ArcGIS Online or QGIS with hosting without entering a sales process
- Paid tiers are annual contract only with no monthly option, which excludes consultancies that need a tool for a single short engagement and forces them to the free non-commercial tier they are not licensed to use for client work
- The API, JavaScript SDK and live warehouse connections are enterprise-only, so a mid-sized team that wants programmatic access has to buy the top tier rather than pay for one capability
- Analytical depth is limited: there is no meaningful geoprocessing, topology checking or model building, so Felt sits beside a real GIS rather than replacing one
- The Professional tier caps data processing at 25 GB a month and map views at 100,000 a month, which are easy to exceed with raster imagery or a public-facing map, and the overage terms are not published either
MapTiler
- The free tier is restricted to testing, personal or non commercial use and forces a MapTiler logo on the map
- Free is capped at 5,000 map sessions, 1,000 search sessions and 100,000 API requests a month
- Free storage is 5 GB but limited to a single file
- The Flex plan at $30 a month bills overage at $2.50 per 1,000 sessions and $0.15 per 1,000 API requests
- Soft usage limits that prevent surprise overage bills are a Custom plan feature, so cheaper plans can run up charges
- A 99.9% SLA requires the prepaid Custom contract
Pricing, plan by plan
Felt
Free- PersonalFree
- Free forever for non-commercial mapping
- Map creation, upload and sharing
- Not licensed for commercial use
- Professional$undefined/year
- 10 full-access seats with unlimited viewers
- 25 GB of data processing per month
- 100,000 map views per month
- Enterprise$undefined/year
- Live cloud sources including Postgres, Snowflake, BigQuery, Databricks and S3
- REST API and JavaScript SDK
- AI features
MapTiler
Free- FreeFree
- 5 GB storage
- 1 file maximum
- 5,000 monthly sessions
- Flex$30/monthly
- 10 GB storage
- 25,000 monthly sessions
- 500,000 monthly API requests
- Custom$null/prepaid
- Custom storage and monthly sessions
- Custom API request limits
- 99.9 percent SLA
Which should you pick?
Choose Felt if
- You need real-time collaboration.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want drag and drop data.
Choose MapTiler if
- You need core functionality.
- You want to start without paying.
- You also want user interface.
Questions people ask
- Is Felt or MapTiler better?
- Neither clearly leads. Felt starts at Free and MapTiler at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Felt or MapTiler?
- Felt starts at Free and MapTiler at Free.
- Does Felt or MapTiler run on more platforms?
- Felt runs on Web, iOS, Android. MapTiler runs on Web.
- Can I use Felt for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Felt best used for?
- Felt is most often used for an environmental consultancy that needs a client to view and comment on survey results without installing gis software, a utility field crew collecting asset condition offline and syncing to the same map the office is looking at, a planning department sharing a proposal map with the public where the viewer count is unpredictable and viewer seats would be uncosted, a team of analysts who each hold data in different formats and want one map assembled in an afternoon rather than a week. Of those, an environmental consultancy that needs a client to view and comment on survey results without installing gis software and a utility field crew collecting asset condition offline and syncing to the same map the office is looking at are not what MapTiler is typically brought in for.
- What can Felt do that MapTiler cannot?
- Felt covers Real-time collaboration, Drag and drop data, Unlimited viewers, Field app with offline support. MapTiler covers Core Functionality, User Interface.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Felt: What does Felt cost?
Felt does not publish prices for Professional or Enterprise. Personal is free but licensed for non-commercial use only.
MapTiler: What happens if I exceed my session or API request limits on the Flex plan?
On the Flex plan, overage charges apply when you exceed limits. Sessions cost $2.50 per 1,000 over the monthly limit of 25,000. API requests cost $0.15 per 1,000 over the 500,000 monthly limit. Additional storage of 100 GB costs $20 per month.
SourceFelt: Can I pay monthly?
No. Paid plans are annual contracts. There is a 7 day trial of Professional.
MapTiler: Can I use the Free plan for commercial projects?
No, the Free plan is restricted to testing, personal, or non-commercial use only. Commercial use is only permitted on the Flex plan ($30/month) or Custom plans with prepaid volume contracts.
SourceFelt: Do viewers cost anything?
No. Viewer access is unlimited on the paid plans, which is the main reason organisations with large map audiences choose it.
MapTiler: What is the difference between Flex and Custom plans?
The Flex plan costs $30 per month with preset limits and pay-as-you-go overages. Custom plans are negotiated per customer for high-traffic use cases and include 99.9 percent SLA, team account support, and prepaid volume contracts. All prices are in USD excluding VAT.
SourceFelt: Is there a nonprofit discount?
Yes, 30 per cent for verified United States nonprofits, and free access for verified students and classrooms.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Felt vs Esri ArcGIS
- Felt vs CARTO
- Felt vs QGIS
- Felt vs Atlas.co
- Felt vs Global Mapper
- Felt vs GRASS GIS
- Felt vs onX Maps
- Felt vs Ride with GPS
- Felt vs SW Maps
- Felt vs TomTom Developer Portal
- Felt vs Kepler.gl
- Felt vs Trailforks
- Felt vs AllTrails
- Felt vs Bing Maps
- Felt vs Cesium ion
- Felt vs Citymapper
- Felt vs ArcGIS Survey123
- Felt vs ArcGIS Field Maps
- Felt vs Google Maps Platform
- Felt vs Mapbox
- Felt vs HERE Technologies
- Felt vs Apple Maps
- Felt vs Geoapify
- Felt vs OpenRouteService
- Felt vs Stadia Maps
- Felt vs Leaflet
- Felt vs OSRM
- Felt vs Polaris Navigation GPS
- Felt vs PositionStack
- Felt vs Radar
- Felt vs SAGA GIS
- MapTiler vs Esri ArcGIS
- MapTiler vs CARTO
- MapTiler vs QGIS
- MapTiler vs Atlas.co
- MapTiler vs Global Mapper
- MapTiler vs GRASS GIS
- MapTiler vs onX Maps
- MapTiler vs Ride with GPS
- MapTiler vs SW Maps
- MapTiler vs TomTom Developer Portal
- MapTiler vs Kepler.gl
- MapTiler vs Trailforks
- MapTiler vs AllTrails
- MapTiler vs Bing Maps
- MapTiler vs Cesium ion
- MapTiler vs Citymapper
- MapTiler vs ArcGIS Survey123
- MapTiler vs ArcGIS Field Maps
- MapTiler vs Google Maps Platform
- MapTiler vs Mapbox
- MapTiler vs HERE Technologies
- MapTiler vs Apple Maps
- MapTiler vs Geoapify
- MapTiler vs OpenRouteService
- MapTiler vs Stadia Maps
- MapTiler vs Leaflet
- MapTiler vs OSRM
- MapTiler vs Polaris Navigation GPS
- MapTiler vs PositionStack
- MapTiler vs Radar
- MapTiler vs SAGA GIS
