Maps · head to head
Felt vs OsmAnd

Felt
Maps
Collaborative browser mapping with a free non-commercial tier and annual-only paid contracts
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

OsmAnd
Maps
Open-source map and navigation application based on OpenStreetMap data
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Felt felt publishes no prices for Professional or Enterprise, so buyers cannot compare against ArcGIS Online or QGIS with hosting without entering a sales process; OsmAnd free version limited to only 7 map downloads at once, restricting users who need multiple regional maps
- They diverge on capability: Felt covers Real-time collaboration, OsmAnd covers Core Functionality.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Felt and OsmAnd actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Maps).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Felt
- Real-time collaboration
- Drag and drop data
- Unlimited viewers
- Field app with offline support
- Dashboards
- Live cloud sources
- API and SDK
Only in OsmAnd
- Core Functionality
- User Interface
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Felt
- An environmental consultancy that needs a client to view and comment on survey results without installing GIS softwarenot OsmAnd
- A utility field crew collecting asset condition offline and syncing to the same map the office is looking atnot OsmAnd
- A planning department sharing a proposal map with the public where the viewer count is unpredictable and viewer seats would be uncostednot OsmAnd
- A team of analysts who each hold data in different formats and want one map assembled in an afternoon rather than a weeknot OsmAnd
OsmAnd
- Offline navigation in areas with no data connectionnot Felt
- Turn-by-turn voice guided drivingnot Felt
- Bicycle and pedestrian routingnot Felt
- Hiking and trail running navigationnot Felt
- Motorcycling and travel using per-country or per-region offline mapsnot Felt
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Felt
- Felt publishes no prices for Professional or Enterprise, so buyers cannot compare against ArcGIS Online or QGIS with hosting without entering a sales process
- Paid tiers are annual contract only with no monthly option, which excludes consultancies that need a tool for a single short engagement and forces them to the free non-commercial tier they are not licensed to use for client work
- The API, JavaScript SDK and live warehouse connections are enterprise-only, so a mid-sized team that wants programmatic access has to buy the top tier rather than pay for one capability
- Analytical depth is limited: there is no meaningful geoprocessing, topology checking or model building, so Felt sits beside a real GIS rather than replacing one
- The Professional tier caps data processing at 25 GB a month and map views at 100,000 a month, which are easy to exceed with raster imagery or a public-facing map, and the overage terms are not published either
OsmAnd
- Free version limited to only 7 map downloads at once, restricting users who need multiple regional maps
- Poor performance with slow map rendering and navigation lag reported on older devices
- Route calculation limited to approximately 200 kilometers or less for offline calculation
- Map accuracy issues due to reliance on community OpenStreetMap data which may contain outdated information
Pricing, plan by plan
Felt
Free- PersonalFree
- Free forever for non-commercial mapping
- Map creation, upload and sharing
- Not licensed for commercial use
- Professional$undefined/year
- 10 full-access seats with unlimited viewers
- 25 GB of data processing per month
- 100,000 map views per month
- Enterprise$undefined/year
- Live cloud sources including Postgres, Snowflake, BigQuery, Databricks and S3
- REST API and JavaScript SDK
- AI features
OsmAnd
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the OsmAnd review.
Which should you pick?
Choose Felt if
- You need real-time collaboration.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want drag and drop data.
Choose OsmAnd if
- You need core functionality.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on iOS, Android, Desktop Editor, Huawei AppGallery.
- You also want user interface.
Questions people ask
- Is Felt or OsmAnd better?
- Neither clearly leads. Felt starts at Free and OsmAnd at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Felt or OsmAnd?
- Felt starts at Free and OsmAnd at Free.
- Does Felt or OsmAnd run on more platforms?
- Felt runs on Web, iOS, Android. OsmAnd runs on iOS, Android, Desktop Editor, Huawei AppGallery.
- Can I use Felt for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Felt best used for?
- Felt is most often used for an environmental consultancy that needs a client to view and comment on survey results without installing gis software, a utility field crew collecting asset condition offline and syncing to the same map the office is looking at, a planning department sharing a proposal map with the public where the viewer count is unpredictable and viewer seats would be uncosted, a team of analysts who each hold data in different formats and want one map assembled in an afternoon rather than a week. Of those, an environmental consultancy that needs a client to view and comment on survey results without installing gis software and a utility field crew collecting asset condition offline and syncing to the same map the office is looking at are not what OsmAnd is typically brought in for.
- What can Felt do that OsmAnd cannot?
- Felt covers Real-time collaboration, Drag and drop data, Unlimited viewers, Field app with offline support. OsmAnd covers Core Functionality, User Interface.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Felt: What does Felt cost?
Felt does not publish prices for Professional or Enterprise. Personal is free but licensed for non-commercial use only.
OsmAnd: Does OsmAnd work offline?
Yes. OsmAnd works fully offline after downloading maps for specific regions. Route calculation, turn-by-turn navigation, and POI search all work without an internet connection.
SourceFelt: Can I pay monthly?
No. Paid plans are annual contracts. There is a 7 day trial of Professional.
OsmAnd: What is OsmAnd's pricing?
OsmAnd Free version is available with limitations including only 7 map downloads allowed at once and no 3D map views. OsmAnd Pro subscription costs 2.99 euros per month or 29.99 euros per year, offering 3D maps, hourly map refreshes, and cloud storage.
SourceFelt: Do viewers cost anything?
No. Viewer access is unlimited on the paid plans, which is the main reason organisations with large map audiences choose it.
OsmAnd: What maps does OsmAnd use?
OsmAnd uses free OpenStreetMap data, which is updated monthly or hourly through OsmAnd Live. Wikipedia POI data is available for sightseeing, and users can add optional online tile map overlays.
SourceFelt: Is there a nonprofit discount?
Yes, 30 per cent for verified United States nonprofits, and free access for verified students and classrooms.
OsmAnd: Can I use OsmAnd on iOS and Android?
Yes. OsmAnd is available on both iOS via Apple App Store and Android via Google Play Store, with identical offline functionality on both platforms.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Felt vs Esri ArcGIS
- Felt vs CARTO
- Felt vs QGIS
- Felt vs Atlas.co
- Felt vs Global Mapper
- Felt vs GRASS GIS
- Felt vs onX Maps
- Felt vs Ride with GPS
- Felt vs SW Maps
- Felt vs TomTom Developer Portal
- Felt vs Kepler.gl
- Felt vs Trailforks
- Felt vs AllTrails
- Felt vs Bing Maps
- Felt vs Cesium ion
- Felt vs Citymapper
- Felt vs ArcGIS Survey123
- Felt vs ArcGIS Field Maps
- Felt vs HERE Technologies
- Felt vs Apple Maps
- Felt vs Mapbox
- Felt vs MAPS.ME
- Felt vs LocationIQ
- Felt vs Navmii GPS
- Felt vs OpenRouteService
- Felt vs OSRM
- Felt vs Google Maps Platform
- Felt vs HERE WeGo
- OsmAnd vs Esri ArcGIS
- OsmAnd vs CARTO
- OsmAnd vs QGIS
- OsmAnd vs Atlas.co
- OsmAnd vs Global Mapper
- OsmAnd vs GRASS GIS
- OsmAnd vs onX Maps
- OsmAnd vs Ride with GPS
- OsmAnd vs SW Maps
- OsmAnd vs TomTom Developer Portal
- OsmAnd vs Kepler.gl
- OsmAnd vs Trailforks
- OsmAnd vs AllTrails
- OsmAnd vs Bing Maps
- OsmAnd vs Cesium ion
- OsmAnd vs Citymapper
- OsmAnd vs ArcGIS Survey123
- OsmAnd vs ArcGIS Field Maps
- OsmAnd vs HERE Technologies
- OsmAnd vs Apple Maps
- OsmAnd vs Mapbox
- OsmAnd vs MAPS.ME
- OsmAnd vs LocationIQ
- OsmAnd vs Navmii GPS
- OsmAnd vs OpenRouteService
- OsmAnd vs OSRM
- OsmAnd vs Google Maps Platform
- OsmAnd vs HERE WeGo
