Maps · head to head
Felt vs Stadia Maps

Felt
Maps
Collaborative browser mapping with a free non-commercial tier and annual-only paid contracts
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
Stadia Maps
Maps
High-performance map tiles, routing, geocoding, and search APIs for developers with reliable
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Felt felt publishes no prices for Professional or Enterprise, so buyers cannot compare against ArcGIS Online or QGIS with hosting without entering a sales process; Stadia Maps limited customization features compared to Mapbox
- They diverge on capability: Felt covers Real-time collaboration, Stadia Maps covers Core Functionality.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Felt and Stadia Maps actually diverge.
| Attribute | Felt | Stadia Maps |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | quote | Unknown |
| Platforms | Web, iOS, Android | Web, JavaScript |
| Founded | Unknown | 2016 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Maps).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Felt
- Real-time collaboration
- Drag and drop data
- Unlimited viewers
- Field app with offline support
- Dashboards
- Live cloud sources
- API and SDK
Only in Stadia Maps
- Core Functionality
- User Interface
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Felt
- An environmental consultancy that needs a client to view and comment on survey results without installing GIS softwarenot Stadia Maps
- A utility field crew collecting asset condition offline and syncing to the same map the office is looking atnot Stadia Maps
- A planning department sharing a proposal map with the public where the viewer count is unpredictable and viewer seats would be uncostednot Stadia Maps
- A team of analysts who each hold data in different formats and want one map assembled in an afternoon rather than a weeknot Stadia Maps
Stadia Maps
No use cases recorded yet. See the Stadia Maps review.
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Felt
- Felt publishes no prices for Professional or Enterprise, so buyers cannot compare against ArcGIS Online or QGIS with hosting without entering a sales process
- Paid tiers are annual contract only with no monthly option, which excludes consultancies that need a tool for a single short engagement and forces them to the free non-commercial tier they are not licensed to use for client work
- The API, JavaScript SDK and live warehouse connections are enterprise-only, so a mid-sized team that wants programmatic access has to buy the top tier rather than pay for one capability
- Analytical depth is limited: there is no meaningful geoprocessing, topology checking or model building, so Felt sits beside a real GIS rather than replacing one
- The Professional tier caps data processing at 25 GB a month and map views at 100,000 a month, which are easy to exceed with raster imagery or a public-facing map, and the overage terms are not published either
Stadia Maps
- Limited customization features compared to Mapbox
- Relies entirely on OpenStreetMap data, inheriting its accuracy and coverage limitations
- Smaller service with fewer community resources and support options compared to Google Maps or Mapbox
- Limited real-time traffic data compared to larger mapping providers like Google Maps
Pricing, plan by plan
Felt
Free- PersonalFree
- Free forever for non-commercial mapping
- Map creation, upload and sharing
- Not licensed for commercial use
- Professional$undefined/year
- 10 full-access seats with unlimited viewers
- 25 GB of data processing per month
- 100,000 map views per month
- Enterprise$undefined/year
- Live cloud sources including Postgres, Snowflake, BigQuery, Databricks and S3
- REST API and JavaScript SDK
- AI features
Stadia Maps
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the Stadia Maps review.
Which should you pick?
Choose Felt if
- You need real-time collaboration.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want drag and drop data.
Choose Stadia Maps if
- You need core functionality.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, JavaScript.
- You also want user interface.
Questions people ask
- Is Felt or Stadia Maps better?
- Neither clearly leads. Felt starts at Free and Stadia Maps at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Felt or Stadia Maps?
- Felt starts at Free and Stadia Maps at Free.
- Does Felt or Stadia Maps run on more platforms?
- Felt runs on Web, iOS, Android. Stadia Maps runs on Web, JavaScript.
- Can I use Felt for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Felt best used for?
- Felt is most often used for an environmental consultancy that needs a client to view and comment on survey results without installing gis software, a utility field crew collecting asset condition offline and syncing to the same map the office is looking at, a planning department sharing a proposal map with the public where the viewer count is unpredictable and viewer seats would be uncosted, a team of analysts who each hold data in different formats and want one map assembled in an afternoon rather than a week. Of those, an environmental consultancy that needs a client to view and comment on survey results without installing gis software and a utility field crew collecting asset condition offline and syncing to the same map the office is looking at are not what Stadia Maps is typically brought in for.
- What can Felt do that Stadia Maps cannot?
- Felt covers Real-time collaboration, Drag and drop data, Unlimited viewers, Field app with offline support. Stadia Maps covers Core Functionality, User Interface.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Felt: What does Felt cost?
Felt does not publish prices for Professional or Enterprise. Personal is free but licensed for non-commercial use only.
Stadia Maps: What is Stadia Maps' pricing model?
Stadia Maps uses a credits-based pricing model with fixed credit pools to prevent billing shock. Starter, Standard, and Professional plans are available, with a 14-day free trial for new accounts.
SourceFelt: Can I pay monthly?
No. Paid plans are annual contracts. There is a 7 day trial of Professional.
Stadia Maps: Does Stadia Maps have a free tier?
Yes, Stadia Maps offers a free tier for development, evaluation, and non-commercial use including academic applications.
SourceFelt: Do viewers cost anything?
No. Viewer access is unlimited on the paid plans, which is the main reason organisations with large map audiences choose it.
Stadia Maps: What data does Stadia Maps use?
Stadia Maps builds on OpenStreetMap data, so the coverage and accuracy depend on OSM's crowdsourced contributors.
SourceFelt: Is there a nonprofit discount?
Yes, 30 per cent for verified United States nonprofits, and free access for verified students and classrooms.
Related pages
More on Stadia Maps
Other head to heads
- Felt vs Esri ArcGIS
- Felt vs CARTO
- Felt vs QGIS
- Felt vs Atlas.co
- Felt vs Global Mapper
- Felt vs GRASS GIS
- Felt vs onX Maps
- Felt vs Ride with GPS
- Felt vs SW Maps
- Felt vs TomTom Developer Portal
- Felt vs Kepler.gl
- Felt vs Trailforks
- Felt vs AllTrails
- Felt vs Bing Maps
- Felt vs Cesium ion
- Felt vs Citymapper
- Felt vs ArcGIS Survey123
- Felt vs ArcGIS Field Maps
- Felt vs Mapbox
- Felt vs Google Maps Platform
- Felt vs Leaflet
- Felt vs Geoapify
- Felt vs LocationIQ
- Felt vs OpenRouteService
- Felt vs OSRM
- Felt vs GraphHopper
- Felt vs MapTiler
- Felt vs Mapzen
- Felt vs Navmii GPS
- Felt vs Nominatim
- Felt vs OpenLayers
- Felt vs OpenStreetMap
- Felt vs Google Maps
- Stadia Maps vs Esri ArcGIS
- Stadia Maps vs CARTO
- Stadia Maps vs QGIS
- Stadia Maps vs Atlas.co
- Stadia Maps vs Global Mapper
- Stadia Maps vs GRASS GIS
- Stadia Maps vs onX Maps
- Stadia Maps vs Ride with GPS
- Stadia Maps vs SW Maps
- Stadia Maps vs TomTom Developer Portal
- Stadia Maps vs Kepler.gl
- Stadia Maps vs Trailforks
- Stadia Maps vs AllTrails
- Stadia Maps vs Bing Maps
- Stadia Maps vs Cesium ion
- Stadia Maps vs Citymapper
- Stadia Maps vs ArcGIS Survey123
- Stadia Maps vs ArcGIS Field Maps
- Stadia Maps vs Mapbox
- Stadia Maps vs Google Maps Platform
- Stadia Maps vs Leaflet
- Stadia Maps vs Geoapify
- Stadia Maps vs LocationIQ
- Stadia Maps vs OpenRouteService
- Stadia Maps vs OSRM
- Stadia Maps vs GraphHopper
- Stadia Maps vs MapTiler
- Stadia Maps vs Mapzen
- Stadia Maps vs Navmii GPS
- Stadia Maps vs Nominatim
- Stadia Maps vs OpenLayers
- Stadia Maps vs OpenStreetMap
- Stadia Maps vs Google Maps
