Maps · head to head
Felt vs Nominatim

Felt
Maps
Collaborative browser mapping with a free non-commercial tier and annual-only paid contracts
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Nominatim
Maps
Open-source geocoding tool for OpenStreetMap data, providing address search and reverse geocoding capabilities
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Felt has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Felt felt publishes no prices for Professional or Enterprise, so buyers cannot compare against ArcGIS Online or QGIS with hosting without entering a sales process; Nominatim the public API allows an absolute maximum of 1 request per second
- They diverge on capability: Felt covers Real-time collaboration, Nominatim covers Core Functionality.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Felt and Nominatim actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Maps).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Felt
- Real-time collaboration
- Drag and drop data
- Unlimited viewers
- Field app with offline support
- Dashboards
- Live cloud sources
- API and SDK
Only in Nominatim
- Core Functionality
- User Interface
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Felt
- An environmental consultancy that needs a client to view and comment on survey results without installing GIS softwarenot Nominatim
- A utility field crew collecting asset condition offline and syncing to the same map the office is looking atnot Nominatim
- A planning department sharing a proposal map with the public where the viewer count is unpredictable and viewer seats would be uncostednot Nominatim
- A team of analysts who each hold data in different formats and want one map assembled in an afternoon rather than a weeknot Nominatim
Nominatim
- Geocoding and reverse geocoding servicesnot Felt
- Address lookup and location searchnot Felt
- OpenStreetMap-based geolocation datanot Felt
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Felt
- Felt publishes no prices for Professional or Enterprise, so buyers cannot compare against ArcGIS Online or QGIS with hosting without entering a sales process
- Paid tiers are annual contract only with no monthly option, which excludes consultancies that need a tool for a single short engagement and forces them to the free non-commercial tier they are not licensed to use for client work
- The API, JavaScript SDK and live warehouse connections are enterprise-only, so a mid-sized team that wants programmatic access has to buy the top tier rather than pay for one capability
- Analytical depth is limited: there is no meaningful geoprocessing, topology checking or model building, so Felt sits beside a real GIS rather than replacing one
- The Professional tier caps data processing at 25 GB a month and map views at 100,000 a month, which are easy to exceed with raster imagery or a public-facing map, and the overage terms are not published either
Nominatim
- The public API allows an absolute maximum of 1 request per second
- Bulk geocoding must run in a single thread and cannot be distributed across machines
- Scripts running longer than a day or on a schedule are limited to 4 requests per minute
- Autocomplete search against the public API is explicitly prohibited
- Systematic queries such as grid based reverse lookups and complete data downloads are prohibited
- Reselling geocoding results or acting as an API intermediary is prohibited
- Every request must send a valid HTTP Referer or User-Agent identifying the application, and default library headers are rejected
- Results must be cached client side, and repeated identical queries can lead to blocking
- Attribution to OpenStreetMap under ODbL must be displayed
Pricing, plan by plan
Felt
Free- PersonalFree
- Free forever for non-commercial mapping
- Map creation, upload and sharing
- Not licensed for commercial use
- Professional$undefined/year
- 10 full-access seats with unlimited viewers
- 25 GB of data processing per month
- 100,000 map views per month
- Enterprise$undefined/year
- Live cloud sources including Postgres, Snowflake, BigQuery, Databricks and S3
- REST API and JavaScript SDK
- AI features
Nominatim
On requestNo published plan breakdown. See the Nominatim review.
Which should you pick?
Choose Felt if
- You need real-time collaboration.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want drag and drop data.
Questions people ask
- Is Felt or Nominatim better?
- Neither clearly leads. Felt starts at Free and Nominatim at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Felt or Nominatim?
- Felt has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Felt and On request for Nominatim.
- Does Felt or Nominatim run on more platforms?
- Felt runs on Web, iOS, Android. Nominatim runs on Web.
- Can I use Felt for free?
- Yes. Felt has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Nominatim starts at On request.
- What is Felt best used for?
- Felt is most often used for an environmental consultancy that needs a client to view and comment on survey results without installing gis software, a utility field crew collecting asset condition offline and syncing to the same map the office is looking at, a planning department sharing a proposal map with the public where the viewer count is unpredictable and viewer seats would be uncosted, a team of analysts who each hold data in different formats and want one map assembled in an afternoon rather than a week. Of those, an environmental consultancy that needs a client to view and comment on survey results without installing gis software and a utility field crew collecting asset condition offline and syncing to the same map the office is looking at are not what Nominatim is typically brought in for.
- What can Felt do that Nominatim cannot?
- Felt covers Real-time collaboration, Drag and drop data, Unlimited viewers, Field app with offline support. Nominatim covers Core Functionality, User Interface.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Felt: What does Felt cost?
Felt does not publish prices for Professional or Enterprise. Personal is free but licensed for non-commercial use only.
Nominatim: Is Nominatim free?
Nominatim is open source software built on OpenStreetMap data. It appears to be free to use, though commercial usage may require separate licensing or terms. Check the project repository or contact support for clarity on licensing.
SourceFelt: Can I pay monthly?
No. Paid plans are annual contracts. There is a 7 day trial of Professional.
Nominatim: What is Nominatim's pricing model?
Nominatim does not publish a standard pricing model on its website. As open source software, it is available for free, but commercial or large-scale deployments may require reviewing their licensing terms or contacting project maintainers.
SourceFelt: Do viewers cost anything?
No. Viewer access is unlimited on the paid plans, which is the main reason organisations with large map audiences choose it.
Felt: Is there a nonprofit discount?
Yes, 30 per cent for verified United States nonprofits, and free access for verified students and classrooms.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Felt vs Esri ArcGIS
- Felt vs CARTO
- Felt vs QGIS
- Felt vs Atlas.co
- Felt vs Global Mapper
- Felt vs GRASS GIS
- Felt vs onX Maps
- Felt vs Ride with GPS
- Felt vs SW Maps
- Felt vs TomTom Developer Portal
- Felt vs Kepler.gl
- Felt vs Trailforks
- Felt vs AllTrails
- Felt vs Bing Maps
- Felt vs Cesium ion
- Felt vs Citymapper
- Felt vs ArcGIS Survey123
- Felt vs ArcGIS Field Maps
- Felt vs Mapbox
- Felt vs Google Maps Platform
- Felt vs HERE Technologies
- Felt vs Apple Maps
- Felt vs LocationIQ
- Felt vs Geoapify
- Felt vs OpenRouteService
- Felt vs OSRM
- Felt vs PositionStack
- Felt vs Stadia Maps
- Felt vs GraphHopper
- Felt vs Leica Infinity
- Felt vs Lonboard
- Felt vs Mapillary
- Felt vs MapQuest
- Felt vs MAPS.ME
- Felt vs Google Maps
- Nominatim vs Esri ArcGIS
- Nominatim vs CARTO
- Nominatim vs QGIS
- Nominatim vs Atlas.co
- Nominatim vs Global Mapper
- Nominatim vs GRASS GIS
- Nominatim vs onX Maps
- Nominatim vs Ride with GPS
- Nominatim vs SW Maps
- Nominatim vs TomTom Developer Portal
- Nominatim vs Kepler.gl
- Nominatim vs Trailforks
- Nominatim vs AllTrails
- Nominatim vs Bing Maps
- Nominatim vs Cesium ion
- Nominatim vs Citymapper
- Nominatim vs ArcGIS Survey123
- Nominatim vs ArcGIS Field Maps
- Nominatim vs Mapbox
- Nominatim vs Google Maps Platform
- Nominatim vs HERE Technologies
- Nominatim vs Apple Maps
- Nominatim vs LocationIQ
- Nominatim vs Geoapify
- Nominatim vs OpenRouteService
- Nominatim vs OSRM
- Nominatim vs PositionStack
- Nominatim vs Stadia Maps
- Nominatim vs GraphHopper
- Nominatim vs Leica Infinity
- Nominatim vs Lonboard
- Nominatim vs Mapillary
- Nominatim vs MapQuest
- Nominatim vs MAPS.ME
- Nominatim vs Google Maps
