Maps · head to head
Felt vs Mappedin

Felt
Maps
Collaborative browser mapping with a free non-commercial tier and annual-only paid contracts
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Mappedin
Maps
Enterprise indoor mapping platform that helps venues create interactive 3D maps, wayfinding
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Felt felt publishes no prices for Professional or Enterprise, so buyers cannot compare against ArcGIS Online or QGIS with hosting without entering a sales process; Mappedin location naming is the leading source of integration failures, requiring manual cleanup of AI-generated labels
- They diverge on capability: Felt covers Real-time collaboration, Mappedin covers Core Functionality.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Felt and Mappedin actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Maps).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Felt
- Real-time collaboration
- Drag and drop data
- Unlimited viewers
- Field app with offline support
- Dashboards
- Live cloud sources
- API and SDK
Only in Mappedin
- Core Functionality
- User Interface
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Felt
- An environmental consultancy that needs a client to view and comment on survey results without installing GIS softwarenot Mappedin
- A utility field crew collecting asset condition offline and syncing to the same map the office is looking atnot Mappedin
- A planning department sharing a proposal map with the public where the viewer count is unpredictable and viewer seats would be uncostednot Mappedin
- A team of analysts who each hold data in different formats and want one map assembled in an afternoon rather than a weeknot Mappedin
Mappedin
- Indoor navigation and map experience for buildingsnot Felt
- Operations management for facility and workplace planningnot Felt
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Felt
- Felt publishes no prices for Professional or Enterprise, so buyers cannot compare against ArcGIS Online or QGIS with hosting without entering a sales process
- Paid tiers are annual contract only with no monthly option, which excludes consultancies that need a tool for a single short engagement and forces them to the free non-commercial tier they are not licensed to use for client work
- The API, JavaScript SDK and live warehouse connections are enterprise-only, so a mid-sized team that wants programmatic access has to buy the top tier rather than pay for one capability
- Analytical depth is limited: there is no meaningful geoprocessing, topology checking or model building, so Felt sits beside a real GIS rather than replacing one
- The Professional tier caps data processing at 25 GB a month and map views at 100,000 a month, which are easy to exceed with raster imagery or a public-facing map, and the overage terms are not published either
Mappedin
- Location naming is the leading source of integration failures, requiring manual cleanup of AI-generated labels
- Multi-building campus maps not supported for Microsoft Places integration
- No native digital signage CMS for integrated sign management
- Limited analytics capabilities compared to competitors in complex enterprise environments
Pricing, plan by plan
Felt
Free- PersonalFree
- Free forever for non-commercial mapping
- Map creation, upload and sharing
- Not licensed for commercial use
- Professional$undefined/year
- 10 full-access seats with unlimited viewers
- 25 GB of data processing per month
- 100,000 map views per month
- Enterprise$undefined/year
- Live cloud sources including Postgres, Snowflake, BigQuery, Databricks and S3
- REST API and JavaScript SDK
- AI features
Mappedin
Free- FreeFree
- 1 map
- Basic indoor mapping
- No SDK access
- Custom Enterprise$undefined/mo
- Subscription-based on square footage
- Full platform access
- SDKs and APIs
Which should you pick?
Choose Felt if
- You need real-time collaboration.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want drag and drop data.
Choose Mappedin if
- You need core functionality.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android, Cloud.
- You also want user interface.
Questions people ask
- Is Felt or Mappedin better?
- Neither clearly leads. Felt starts at Free and Mappedin at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Felt or Mappedin?
- Felt starts at Free and Mappedin at Free.
- Does Felt or Mappedin run on more platforms?
- Felt runs on Web, iOS, Android. Mappedin runs on Web, iOS, Android, Cloud.
- Can I use Felt for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Felt best used for?
- Felt is most often used for an environmental consultancy that needs a client to view and comment on survey results without installing gis software, a utility field crew collecting asset condition offline and syncing to the same map the office is looking at, a planning department sharing a proposal map with the public where the viewer count is unpredictable and viewer seats would be uncosted, a team of analysts who each hold data in different formats and want one map assembled in an afternoon rather than a week. Of those, an environmental consultancy that needs a client to view and comment on survey results without installing gis software and a utility field crew collecting asset condition offline and syncing to the same map the office is looking at are not what Mappedin is typically brought in for.
- What can Felt do that Mappedin cannot?
- Felt covers Real-time collaboration, Drag and drop data, Unlimited viewers, Field app with offline support. Mappedin covers Core Functionality, User Interface.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Felt: What does Felt cost?
Felt does not publish prices for Professional or Enterprise. Personal is free but licensed for non-commercial use only.
Mappedin: Does Mappedin support multi-building campus mapping?
Mappedin supports multi-building deployments, but the Places integration requires each building to be mapped as a separate venue rather than as one unified campus map.
SourceFelt: Can I pay monthly?
No. Paid plans are annual contracts. There is a 7 day trial of Professional.
Mappedin: How long does it take to deploy Mappedin for a large venue?
Large venue deployments typically go live within 30-60 days from contract signature. The Mappedin Maker platform enables rapid map creation from floor plans, with professional map-making services available for additional fees.
SourceFelt: Do viewers cost anything?
No. Viewer access is unlimited on the paid plans, which is the main reason organisations with large map audiences choose it.
Mappedin: What platforms and SDKs does Mappedin provide?
Mappedin offers SDKs for Web, iOS, and Android, plus comprehensive APIs and webhooks for integrations. The platform supports venues including airports, shopping malls, stadiums, workplaces, and healthcare facilities.
SourceFelt: Is there a nonprofit discount?
Yes, 30 per cent for verified United States nonprofits, and free access for verified students and classrooms.
Mappedin: Does Mappedin have a free plan?
Yes, Mappedin offers a free plan for creating one initial digital map at app.mappedin.com. Pricing is subscription-based and scales with building size in square footage or square meters.
SourceMappedin: What compliance certifications does Mappedin have?
Mappedin is SOC2 certified, GDPR compliant, and WCAG accessible. The platform includes real-time data management and analytics capabilities.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Felt vs Esri ArcGIS
- Felt vs CARTO
- Felt vs QGIS
- Felt vs Atlas.co
- Felt vs Global Mapper
- Felt vs GRASS GIS
- Felt vs onX Maps
- Felt vs Ride with GPS
- Felt vs SW Maps
- Felt vs TomTom Developer Portal
- Felt vs Kepler.gl
- Felt vs Trailforks
- Felt vs AllTrails
- Felt vs Bing Maps
- Felt vs Cesium ion
- Felt vs Citymapper
- Felt vs ArcGIS Survey123
- Felt vs ArcGIS Field Maps
- Felt vs Mapbox
- Felt vs IndoorAtlas
- Felt vs Google Maps Platform
- Felt vs LocationIQ
- Felt vs HERE Technologies
- Felt vs Leaflet
- Felt vs Radar
- Felt vs Apple Maps
- Felt vs Navmii GPS
- Felt vs Nominatim
- Felt vs OpenLayers
- Felt vs OpenRouteService
- Felt vs OpenStreetMap
- Felt vs OsmAnd
- Mappedin vs Esri ArcGIS
- Mappedin vs CARTO
- Mappedin vs QGIS
- Mappedin vs Atlas.co
- Mappedin vs Global Mapper
- Mappedin vs GRASS GIS
- Mappedin vs onX Maps
- Mappedin vs Ride with GPS
- Mappedin vs SW Maps
- Mappedin vs TomTom Developer Portal
- Mappedin vs Kepler.gl
- Mappedin vs Trailforks
- Mappedin vs AllTrails
- Mappedin vs Bing Maps
- Mappedin vs Cesium ion
- Mappedin vs Citymapper
- Mappedin vs ArcGIS Survey123
- Mappedin vs ArcGIS Field Maps
- Mappedin vs Mapbox
- Mappedin vs IndoorAtlas
- Mappedin vs Google Maps Platform
- Mappedin vs LocationIQ
- Mappedin vs HERE Technologies
- Mappedin vs Leaflet
- Mappedin vs Radar
- Mappedin vs Apple Maps
- Mappedin vs Navmii GPS
- Mappedin vs Nominatim
- Mappedin vs OpenLayers
- Mappedin vs OpenRouteService
- Mappedin vs OpenStreetMap
- Mappedin vs OsmAnd
