Maps · head to head
Global Mapper vs LocationIQ
Global Mapper
Maps
A GIS and lidar desktop that still sells a genuine perpetual licence with published prices
- From
- $700/one-time
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only LocationIQ has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Global Mapper it is Windows only with no macOS or Linux build, so mixed-platform teams end up running a virtual machine and lose graphics performance on large point clouds; LocationIQ smaller ecosystem of integrations compared to Google Maps
- They diverge on capability: Global Mapper covers Format breadth, LocationIQ covers Core Functionality.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Global Mapper and LocationIQ actually diverge.
| Attribute | Global Mapper | LocationIQ |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $700/one-time | Free |
| Pricing model | One-time purchase | subscription |
| Free tier | No | Yes |
| Platforms | Windows | API |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Maps).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Global Mapper
- Format breadth
- Lidar processing
- Pixels to Points
- Coordinate transformation
- Terrain analysis
- Scripting
- Mobile companion
Only in LocationIQ
- Core Functionality
- User Interface
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Global Mapper
- A survey office that receives lidar in a different format from every client and needs reliable conversion without writing scriptsnot LocationIQ
- A consultancy that wants to classify ground points and extract building footprints from a drone survey without an Esri enterprise agreementnot LocationIQ
- An organisation with an irregular workload that wants to buy the licence outright and skip maintenance in quiet yearsnot LocationIQ
- A geologist producing volumes, contours and cross sections from terrain data on a standalone office workstationnot LocationIQ
LocationIQ
- Geocoding and reverse geocoding addresses at scalenot Global Mapper
- Store locators and address autofill in web and mobile appsnot Global Mapper
- Asset and vehicle tracking with route optimisationnot Global Mapper
- Serving static and dynamic map tilesnot Global Mapper
- Distance matrix and route planningnot Global Mapper
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Global Mapper
- It is Windows only with no macOS or Linux build, so mixed-platform teams end up running a virtual machine and lose graphics performance on large point clouds
- The interface has grown by accretion over two decades and features are scattered across menus, so new users are slow to find capabilities that are already installed
- Node-locked perpetual licences are tied to the machine identifier, so a hardware refresh or a failed workstation means a support request rather than a login on a new device
- Multi-user and web publishing are weak relative to Esri or QGIS with a server stack, so it is a desktop analysis tool and not a platform for sharing data across an organisation
- Published prices apply to North America and differ elsewhere, so buyers outside that market must go through a reseller and cannot rely on the listed figures for budgeting
LocationIQ
- Smaller ecosystem of integrations compared to Google Maps
- Less documentation than industry-leading platforms
- Less brand recognition than Google or Mapbox
Pricing, plan by plan
Global Mapper
$700/one-time- Global Mapper Standard, node-locked$700/one-time
- Perpetual licence tied to one machine
- First year of maintenance and support included
- Renewal 245 USD per year, optional
- Global Mapper Standard, floating or dongle$1050/one-time
- Shared between users or carried on a USB dongle
- Maintenance renewal 365 USD per year
- Network licence 2,100 USD with a two-seat minimum
- Global Mapper Pro, node-locked$1750/one-time
- Adds lidar classification, feature extraction and Pixels to Points
- Maintenance renewal 610 USD per year
- Upgrade from Standard version 26 costs 1,050 USD
- Global Mapper Pro, floating or dongle$2625/one-time
- Shared or dongle licence
- Maintenance renewal 915 USD per year
- Network licence 5,250 USD with a two-seat minimum
LocationIQ
Free- FreeFree
- 5,000 requests/day
- Limited commercial use with attribution
- Maps Lite$45/month
- 10,000 map views/day
- Geocoding APIs
- No routing
- Developer$100/month
- 25,000 requests/day
- All APIs (geocoding, routing, maps)
- Startup$200/month
- 60,000 requests/day
- Priority email support
Which should you pick?
Choose Global Mapper if
- You need format breadth.
- You work on Windows.
- You also want lidar processing.
Choose LocationIQ if
- You need core functionality.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on API.
- You also want user interface.
Questions people ask
- Is Global Mapper or LocationIQ better?
- Neither clearly leads. Global Mapper starts at $700/one-time and LocationIQ at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Global Mapper or LocationIQ?
- LocationIQ has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at $700/one-time for Global Mapper and Free for LocationIQ.
- Does Global Mapper or LocationIQ run on more platforms?
- Global Mapper runs on Windows. LocationIQ runs on API.
- Can I use LocationIQ for free?
- Yes. LocationIQ has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Global Mapper starts at $700/one-time.
- What is Global Mapper best used for?
- Global Mapper is most often used for a survey office that receives lidar in a different format from every client and needs reliable conversion without writing scripts, a consultancy that wants to classify ground points and extract building footprints from a drone survey without an esri enterprise agreement, an organisation with an irregular workload that wants to buy the licence outright and skip maintenance in quiet years, a geologist producing volumes, contours and cross sections from terrain data on a standalone office workstation. Of those, a survey office that receives lidar in a different format from every client and needs reliable conversion without writing scripts and a consultancy that wants to classify ground points and extract building footprints from a drone survey without an esri enterprise agreement are not what LocationIQ is typically brought in for.
- What can Global Mapper do that LocationIQ cannot?
- Global Mapper covers Format breadth, Lidar processing, Pixels to Points, Coordinate transformation. LocationIQ covers Core Functionality, User Interface.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Global Mapper: Is there still a perpetual licence?
Yes. Blue Marble sells perpetual node-locked, floating, dongle and network licences that keep working after maintenance lapses.
LocationIQ: How much does LocationIQ cost?
LocationIQ offers a Free plan with 5,000 requests/day, Maps Lite at $45/month for 10,000 map views/day, Developer at $100/month for 25,000 requests/day, and higher tiers up to Business Plus at $950/month for 30M requests/month. All plans are billed monthly with 2 months free for annual prepayment.
SourceGlobal Mapper: What is the difference between Standard and Pro?
Pro is an add-on to a matching Standard licence and carries the lidar classification, feature extraction, Pixels to Points photogrammetry and advanced terrain tools.
LocationIQ: Is LocationIQ free?
Yes, LocationIQ offers a free tier with 5,000 requests/day, providing access to geocoding and mapping APIs. Free tier users must include attribution and cannot use for commercial purposes.
SourceGlobal Mapper: Do I have to pay maintenance?
Only for the first year, which is included. After that it is optional; without it the software continues to run but you receive no upgrades or support.
LocationIQ: What support levels does LocationIQ offer?
Free and early paid tiers receive best-effort email support. The Startup plan ($200/month) includes priority email support. Business Plus ($950/month) includes priority live chat support with dedicated AWS endpoints for improved performance.
SourceGlobal Mapper: Can it replace ArcGIS?
For desktop format conversion, lidar and terrain analysis, often yes. For enterprise data management, web services and organisation-wide sharing, no.
Related pages
More on Global Mapper
Other head to heads
- Global Mapper vs Esri ArcGIS
- Global Mapper vs SAGA GIS
- Global Mapper vs QGIS
- Global Mapper vs Emlid Studio
- Global Mapper vs WhiteboxTools
- Global Mapper vs Potree
- Global Mapper vs Agisoft Metashape
- Global Mapper vs Leica Infinity
- Global Mapper vs GRASS GIS
- Global Mapper vs Felt
- Global Mapper vs CARTO
- Global Mapper vs GraphHopper
- Global Mapper vs HERE WeGo
- Global Mapper vs IndoorAtlas
- Global Mapper vs Mappedin
- Global Mapper vs MapTiler
- Global Mapper vs ArcGIS Survey123
- Global Mapper vs Mapbox
- Global Mapper vs HERE Technologies
- Global Mapper vs Google Maps Platform
- Global Mapper vs Geoapify
- Global Mapper vs Stadia Maps
- Global Mapper vs OpenRouteService
- Global Mapper vs Radar
- Global Mapper vs Nominatim
- Global Mapper vs OsmAnd
- Global Mapper vs Gaia GPS
- Global Mapper vs OSRM
- Global Mapper vs Polaris Navigation GPS
- Global Mapper vs PositionStack
- LocationIQ vs Esri ArcGIS
- LocationIQ vs SAGA GIS
- LocationIQ vs QGIS
- LocationIQ vs Emlid Studio
- LocationIQ vs WhiteboxTools
- LocationIQ vs Potree
- LocationIQ vs Agisoft Metashape
- LocationIQ vs Leica Infinity
- LocationIQ vs GRASS GIS
- LocationIQ vs Felt
- LocationIQ vs CARTO
- LocationIQ vs GraphHopper
- LocationIQ vs HERE WeGo
- LocationIQ vs IndoorAtlas
- LocationIQ vs Mappedin
- LocationIQ vs MapTiler
- LocationIQ vs ArcGIS Survey123
- LocationIQ vs Mapbox
- LocationIQ vs HERE Technologies
- LocationIQ vs Google Maps Platform
- LocationIQ vs Geoapify
- LocationIQ vs Stadia Maps
- LocationIQ vs OpenRouteService
- LocationIQ vs Radar
- LocationIQ vs Nominatim
- LocationIQ vs OsmAnd
- LocationIQ vs Gaia GPS
- LocationIQ vs OSRM
- LocationIQ vs Polaris Navigation GPS
- LocationIQ vs PositionStack