Software · head to head
CrowdTangle vs Muck Rack
C
CrowdTangle
Software
Social media insights and content monitoring platform
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: CrowdTangle crowdTangle was retired by Meta on 14 August 2024, per Meta's own transparency page (Internet Archive capture, 12 December 2024), with Meta Content Library and Content Library API offered as replacements; Muck Rack no pricing is published, and every quote is prepared individually
- They diverge on capability: CrowdTangle covers Social listening, Muck Rack covers Media database.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which CrowdTangle and Muck Rack actually diverge.
| Attribute | CrowdTangle | Muck Rack |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | quote | subscription |
| Platforms | Web | Web, Browser-extension |
| Founded | 2011 | 2009 |
Identical on both: starting price (On request), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in CrowdTangle
- Social listening
- Viral content tracking
- Competitor monitoring
- Brand mention tracking
- Trending alerts
- Custom dashboards
- Team collaboration
- Report generation
Only in Muck Rack
- Media database
- Journalist profiles
- Media monitoring
- Pitching platform
- Coverage reporting
- Slack
- Salesforce
- Google Analytics
Both cover
- Web support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
CrowdTangle
- Viral content trackingnot Muck Rack
- Social listeningnot Muck Rack
- Competitor analysisnot Muck Rack
- Trend identificationnot Muck Rack
Muck Rack
- Finding and pitching journalists from a media databasenot CrowdTangle
- Monitoring coverage and measuring PR resultsnot CrowdTangle
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
CrowdTangle
- CrowdTangle was retired by Meta on 14 August 2024, per Meta's own transparency page (Internet Archive capture, 12 December 2024), with Meta Content Library and Content Library API offered as replacements
Muck Rack
- No pricing is published, and every quote is prepared individually
- Cost depends on user count, so a growing PR team pays more for the same database
- Broadcast monitoring, social listening and press release distribution are separately priced modules rather than included
Pricing, plan by plan
CrowdTangle
On request- Custom Plan$undefined/custom
- Social monitoring
- Competitor analysis
- Trending content tracking
Muck Rack
On request- ProFree
- Media database
- Media monitoring
- Pitching tools
- EnterpriseFree
- All Pro features
- Team management
- SSO integration
Which should you pick?
Choose CrowdTangle if
- You need social listening.
- You also want viral content tracking.
Choose Muck Rack if
- You need media database.
- You work on Web, Browser-extension.
- You also want journalist profiles.
Questions people ask
- Is CrowdTangle or Muck Rack better?
- Neither clearly leads. CrowdTangle starts at On request and Muck Rack at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, CrowdTangle or Muck Rack?
- CrowdTangle starts at On request and Muck Rack at On request.
- Does CrowdTangle or Muck Rack run on more platforms?
- CrowdTangle runs on Web. Muck Rack runs on Web, Browser-extension.
- What is CrowdTangle best used for?
- CrowdTangle is most often used for viral content tracking, social listening, competitor analysis, trend identification. Of those, viral content tracking and social listening are not what Muck Rack is typically brought in for.
- What can CrowdTangle do that Muck Rack cannot?
- CrowdTangle covers Social listening, Viral content tracking, Competitor monitoring, Brand mention tracking. Muck Rack covers Media database, Journalist profiles, Media monitoring, Pitching platform. Both handle Web support.
Related pages
More on CrowdTangle
Keep looking
Other head to heads
- CrowdTangle vs Beehiiv
- CrowdTangle vs Feedly
- CrowdTangle vs Inoreader
- CrowdTangle vs Chartbeat
- CrowdTangle vs Cision
- CrowdTangle vs ConvertKit
- CrowdTangle vs Flipboard
- CrowdTangle vs Ghost
- CrowdTangle vs Ghost CMS
- CrowdTangle vs Google News
- CrowdTangle vs Substack
- CrowdTangle vs Agility PR Solutions
- CrowdTangle vs Apple News
- CrowdTangle vs Arc Publishing
- CrowdTangle vs Artifact
- CrowdTangle vs Brightspot
- CrowdTangle vs Business Wire
- CrowdTangle vs Buttondown
- Muck Rack vs Beehiiv
- Muck Rack vs Feedly
- Muck Rack vs Inoreader
- Muck Rack vs Chartbeat
- Muck Rack vs Cision
- Muck Rack vs ConvertKit
- Muck Rack vs Flipboard
- Muck Rack vs Ghost
- Muck Rack vs Ghost CMS
- Muck Rack vs Google News
- Muck Rack vs Substack
- Muck Rack vs Agility PR Solutions
- Muck Rack vs Apple News
- Muck Rack vs Arc Publishing
- Muck Rack vs Artifact
- Muck Rack vs Brightspot
- Muck Rack vs Business Wire
- Muck Rack vs Buttondown

