SEO · head to head
Clearscope vs Lumar

Clearscope
SEO
Content optimization platform that grades drafts against top-ranking search results
- From
- $129/month
- Rated
- -

Lumar
SEO
Website intelligence platform, formerly DeepCrawl, that can fail a build on SEO and accessibility regressions
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Clearscope entry-level Essentials plan is priced above many competing content-optimization tools, which may deter smaller teams.; Lumar the crawl allowance is measured in URLs per month, so full crawls of a large site exhaust it quickly and teams end up sampling, which is exactly how regressions escape.
- They diverge on capability: Clearscope covers Content grading, Lumar covers Site crawler.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Clearscope and Lumar actually diverge.
| Attribute | Clearscope | Lumar |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $129/month | On request |
| Pricing model | subscription | quote |
| Platforms | web | Web, REST API |
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (SEO).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Clearscope
- Content grading
- Tracked prompts
- Topic exploration
- AI drafts
- Google Docs integration
- Crawler whitelisting
Only in Lumar
- Site crawler
- Protect
- Automation Hub
- Accessibility auditing
- Monitor
- Impact
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Clearscope
- Optimizing blog drafts against top-ranking competitor contentnot Lumar
- Tracking content visibility in AI search resultsnot Lumar
- Agencies producing client content at scalenot Lumar
- Editorial teams standardizing on-page SEO coveragenot Lumar
Lumar
- A site deploying weekly that keeps shipping accidental noindex tags and blocked resources into productionnot Clearscope
- Comparing crawls before and after a migration to prove what changed rather than what looks wrong nownot Clearscope
- Reporting accessibility and technical SEO issues from one crawl to satisfy two different internal ownersnot Clearscope
- Prioritising a backlog of thousands of technical issues by estimated traffic impact rather than severity labelnot Clearscope
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Clearscope
- Entry-level Essentials plan is priced above many competing content-optimization tools, which may deter smaller teams.
- Additional pages and drafts beyond plan limits incur per-unit add-on charges rather than being unlimited.
- Enterprise-only features like SSO and crawler whitelisting are gated behind custom pricing rather than being available on lower tiers.
Lumar
- The crawl allowance is measured in URLs per month, so full crawls of a large site exhaust it quickly and teams end up sampling, which is exactly how regressions escape.
- It provides no keyword, ranking or backlink data, so it is always an addition to the SEO budget rather than a consolidation of it.
- The pipeline gating that justifies the price needs engineering adoption, and a marketing budget cannot buy that agreement.
- Log file analysis is not the core strength it is at Botify, so crawl budget diagnosis on very large sites is weaker.
- The 2022 rebrand from DeepCrawl means much of the community knowledge, tutorials and older documentation is filed under the previous name.
Pricing, plan by plan
Clearscope
$129/month- Essentials$129/month
- 50 tracked prompts
- 50 pages
- 20 monthly topic explorations
- Business$399/month
- 300 tracked prompts
- 300 pages
- 50 monthly topic explorations
- Enterprise$undefined/month
- Custom credits and agreements
- Crawler whitelisting
- Single sign-on (SSO)
Lumar
On request- Lumar$undefined/year
- Priced by URLs crawled per month
- Protect, Impact and accessibility modules licensed separately
- Annual contract
Which should you pick?
Choose Clearscope if
- You need content grading.
- You work on web.
- You also want tracked prompts.
Questions people ask
- Is Clearscope or Lumar better?
- Neither clearly leads. Clearscope starts at $129/month and Lumar at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Clearscope or Lumar?
- Clearscope starts at $129/month and Lumar at On request.
- Does Clearscope or Lumar run on more platforms?
- Clearscope runs on web. Lumar runs on Web, REST API.
- What is Clearscope best used for?
- Clearscope is most often used for optimizing blog drafts against top-ranking competitor content, tracking content visibility in ai search results, agencies producing client content at scale, editorial teams standardizing on-page seo coverage. Of those, optimizing blog drafts against top-ranking competitor content and tracking content visibility in ai search results are not what Lumar is typically brought in for.
- What can Clearscope do that Lumar cannot?
- Clearscope covers Content grading, Tracked prompts, Topic exploration, AI drafts. Lumar covers Site crawler, Protect, Automation Hub, Accessibility auditing.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Clearscope: What does Clearscope cost?
Plans start at Essentials for $129/month and Business for $399/month, with a custom-priced Enterprise tier adding SSO and crawler whitelisting.
SourceLumar: Is Lumar the same as DeepCrawl?
Yes, the same company and product line, rebranded in 2022. Older tutorials under the DeepCrawl name still broadly apply.
Clearscope: Is there a free trial?
Clearscope offers a 14-day free trial with no commitment required before subscribing to a paid plan.
SourceLumar: Can it really block a deployment?
Yes, through Automation Hub integrated into your CI pipeline. Whether your engineering team accepts that gate is the real question.
Clearscope: Can I cancel my plan anytime?
Monthly plans have no minimum contract, so users can cancel anytime without penalty or hassle.
SourceLumar: Does it replace Screaming Frog?
For scheduled monitoring and pipeline testing, yes. For quick ad hoc crawls on a laptop, the desktop crawler remains faster and cheaper.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Clearscope vs Frase
- Clearscope vs MarketMuse
- Clearscope vs seoClarity
- Clearscope vs Keyword Insights
- Clearscope vs AnswerThePublic
- Clearscope vs Surfer SEO
- Clearscope vs Wincher
- Clearscope vs Conductor
- Clearscope vs AccuRanker
- Clearscope vs SE Ranking
- Clearscope vs Advanced Web Ranking
- Clearscope vs SEMrush
- Clearscope vs Botify
- Clearscope vs Mangools
- Clearscope vs Nightwatch
- Clearscope vs Rank Math
- Clearscope vs Screaming Frog SEO Spider
- Clearscope vs Sitebulb
- Clearscope vs OnCrawl
- Clearscope vs Lighthouse
- Clearscope vs Majestic
- Clearscope vs Linkody
- Clearscope vs Serpstat
- Clearscope vs SISTRIX
- Clearscope vs Google Search Console
- Lumar vs Frase
- Lumar vs MarketMuse
- Lumar vs seoClarity
- Lumar vs Keyword Insights
- Lumar vs AnswerThePublic
- Lumar vs Surfer SEO
- Lumar vs Wincher
- Lumar vs Conductor
- Lumar vs AccuRanker
- Lumar vs SE Ranking
- Lumar vs Advanced Web Ranking
- Lumar vs SEMrush
- Lumar vs Botify
- Lumar vs Mangools
- Lumar vs Nightwatch
- Lumar vs Rank Math
- Lumar vs Screaming Frog SEO Spider
- Lumar vs Sitebulb
- Lumar vs OnCrawl
- Lumar vs Lighthouse
- Lumar vs Majestic
- Lumar vs Linkody
- Lumar vs Serpstat
- Lumar vs SISTRIX
- Lumar vs Google Search Console
