Softwr

SEO · head to head

AccuRanker vs Lumar

AccuRanker logo

AccuRanker

SEO

Daily rank tracking built for speed and large keyword volumes

From
On request
Rated
-
Full reviewWebsite
Lumar logo

Lumar

SEO

Website intelligence platform, formerly DeepCrawl, that can fail a build on SEO and accessibility regressions

From
On request
Rated
-
Full reviewWebsite

The short version

  • Each has a real cost: AccuRanker pricing is entirely per keyword slot, so an agency's bill rises mechanically with every new client or expanded tracking list regardless of team size.; Lumar the crawl allowance is measured in URLs per month, so full crawls of a large site exhaust it quickly and teams end up sampling, which is exactly how regressions escape.
  • They diverge on capability: AccuRanker covers Daily rank updates, Lumar covers Site crawler.
  • Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which AccuRanker and Lumar actually diverge.

Attributes where AccuRanker and Lumar differ
AttributeAccuRankerLumar
Pricing modelPer month by tracked keyword countquote
PlatformsWebWeb, REST API

Identical on both: starting price (On request), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (SEO).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in AccuRanker

  • Daily rank updates
  • AI Overview tracking
  • Share of voice
  • Dynamic tagging
  • GSC and GA integration
  • Unlimited read API on Expert plan and above

Only in Lumar

  • Site crawler
  • Protect
  • Automation Hub
  • Accessibility auditing
  • Monitor
  • Impact

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

AccuRanker

  • An agency tracking client keyword sets in the tens of thousands that need the dashboard to stay fast, not just accuratenot Lumar
  • A team that wants daily AI Overview presence tracking rather than a monthly snapshotnot Lumar
  • An in-house SEO group blending its own GSC data with independently tracked rank history longer than 16 monthsnot Lumar
  • A reporting workflow that needs a read API to pull rankings straight into an internal BigQuery warehousenot Lumar

Lumar

  • A site deploying weekly that keeps shipping accidental noindex tags and blocked resources into productionnot AccuRanker
  • Comparing crawls before and after a migration to prove what changed rather than what looks wrong nownot AccuRanker
  • Reporting accessibility and technical SEO issues from one crawl to satisfy two different internal ownersnot AccuRanker
  • Prioritising a backlog of thousands of technical issues by estimated traffic impact rather than severity labelnot AccuRanker

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

AccuRanker

  • Pricing is entirely per keyword slot, so an agency's bill rises mechanically with every new client or expanded tracking list regardless of team size.
  • It has no site crawler, backlink index or content tooling, so it never replaces a full suite and always sits alongside another product for technical audits.
  • Annual billing brings the advertised 10% discount, but committing annually to a keyword-slot price before knowing next year's client roster is a real forecasting risk for agencies.
  • Same-day and hourly refresh options are gated to the higher tiers, so teams that need fast-moving SERP monitoring for volatile niches have to buy up.
  • Enterprise pricing above 25,000 keywords is quote-only, so the largest trackers lose the pricing transparency that makes the lower tiers easy to evaluate.

Lumar

  • The crawl allowance is measured in URLs per month, so full crawls of a large site exhaust it quickly and teams end up sampling, which is exactly how regressions escape.
  • It provides no keyword, ranking or backlink data, so it is always an addition to the SEO budget rather than a consolidation of it.
  • The pipeline gating that justifies the price needs engineering adoption, and a marketing budget cannot buy that agreement.
  • Log file analysis is not the core strength it is at Botify, so crawl budget diagnosis on very large sites is weaker.
  • The 2022 rebrand from DeepCrawl means much of the community knowledge, tutorials and older documentation is filed under the previous name.

Pricing, plan by plan

AccuRanker

On request
  • Professional$224/month
    • From 2,000 tracked keywords, scaling to 5,000
    • Daily updates, keyword research and search intent tagging
    • GSC and GA integration
  • Expert$764/month
    • From 10,000 tracked keywords, scaling to 25,000
    • Dynamic tagging, AI Overview tracking, AI search volume
    • Google Data Studio connector
  • Enterprise$undefined/month
    • Above 25,000 tracked keywords, quoted individually
    • BigQuery export and unlimited write API
    • Raw SERP HTML access

Lumar

On request
  • Lumar$undefined/year
    • Priced by URLs crawled per month
    • Protect, Impact and accessibility modules licensed separately
    • Annual contract

Which should you pick?

Choose AccuRanker if

  • You need daily rank updates.
  • You also want ai overview tracking.
AccuRanker review

Choose Lumar if

  • You need site crawler.
  • You work on Web, REST API.
  • You also want protect.
Lumar review

Questions people ask

Is AccuRanker or Lumar better?
Neither clearly leads. AccuRanker starts at On request and Lumar at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, AccuRanker or Lumar?
AccuRanker starts at On request and Lumar at On request.
Does AccuRanker or Lumar run on more platforms?
AccuRanker runs on Web. Lumar runs on Web, REST API.
What is AccuRanker best used for?
AccuRanker is most often used for an agency tracking client keyword sets in the tens of thousands that need the dashboard to stay fast, not just accurate, a team that wants daily ai overview presence tracking rather than a monthly snapshot, an in-house seo group blending its own gsc data with independently tracked rank history longer than 16 months, a reporting workflow that needs a read api to pull rankings straight into an internal bigquery warehouse. Of those, an agency tracking client keyword sets in the tens of thousands that need the dashboard to stay fast, not just accurate and a team that wants daily ai overview presence tracking rather than a monthly snapshot are not what Lumar is typically brought in for.
What can AccuRanker do that Lumar cannot?
AccuRanker covers Daily rank updates, AI Overview tracking, Share of voice, Dynamic tagging. Lumar covers Site crawler, Protect, Automation Hub, Accessibility auditing.

Answered from the vendors’ own pages

AccuRanker: How is AccuRanker priced?

By the number of keywords tracked per month, in tiers from 2,000 up to 25,000 on published plans, with custom quotes above that.

Lumar: Is Lumar the same as DeepCrawl?

Yes, the same company and product line, rebranded in 2022. Older tutorials under the DeepCrawl name still broadly apply.

AccuRanker: Does it crawl my site for technical SEO issues?

No. It tracks search rankings and SERP features only; pair it with a crawler such as Screaming Frog or Lumar for technical audits.

Lumar: Can it really block a deployment?

Yes, through Automation Hub integrated into your CI pipeline. Whether your engineering team accepts that gate is the real question.

AccuRanker: Can it track AI Overviews and AI search results?

Yes, on the Expert plan and above it flags when a tracked keyword triggers an AI Overview and whether the domain is cited.

Lumar: Does it replace Screaming Frog?

For scheduled monitoring and pipeline testing, yes. For quick ad hoc crawls on a laptop, the desktop crawler remains faster and cheaper.

Share

Related pages

More on AccuRanker

More on Lumar

Keep looking

Other head to heads