Is Conductor or Lumar better?

Neither clearly leads. Conductor starts at On request and Lumar at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.

Which is cheaper, Conductor or Lumar?

Conductor starts at On request and Lumar at On request.

Does Conductor or Lumar run on more platforms?

Conductor runs on Web. Lumar runs on Web, REST API.

What is Conductor best used for?

Conductor is most often used for tracking visibility across chatgpt, perplexity, and gemini, generating seo-optimized content at scale with ai, unifying traditional search and ai answer engine strategies, monitoring competitor positioning in emerging search platforms. Of those, tracking visibility across chatgpt, perplexity, and gemini and generating seo-optimized content at scale with ai are not what Lumar is typically brought in for.

What can Conductor do that Lumar cannot?

Lumar covers Site crawler, Protect, Automation Hub, Accessibility auditing.

SEO · head to head

Conductor vs Lumar

Conductor

SEO

The enterprise platform for AI & search visibility

From: On request
Rated: -

Full review Website

Lumar

SEO

Website intelligence platform, formerly DeepCrawl, that can fail a build on SEO and accessibility regressions

From: On request
Rated: -

Full review Website

The short version

Each has a real cost: Conductor no published dollar amounts for any pricing tier; requires contacting sales or requesting demo to learn costs; Lumar the crawl allowance is measured in URLs per month, so full crawls of a large site exhaust it quickly and teams end up sampling, which is exactly how regressions escape.
Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which Conductor and Lumar actually diverge.

Attributes where Conductor and Lumar differ
Attribute	Conductor	Lumar
Pricing model	usage-based	quote
Platforms	Web	Web, REST API

Identical on both: starting price (On request), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (SEO).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in Conductor

Nothing recorded that Lumar does not also cover.

Only in Lumar

Site crawler
Protect
Automation Hub
Accessibility auditing
Monitor
Impact

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

Conductor

Tracking visibility across ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Gemininot Lumar
Generating SEO-optimized content at scale with AInot Lumar
Unifying traditional search and AI answer engine strategiesnot Lumar
Monitoring competitor positioning in emerging search platformsnot Lumar

Lumar

A site deploying weekly that keeps shipping accidental noindex tags and blocked resources into productionnot Conductor
Comparing crawls before and after a migration to prove what changed rather than what looks wrong nownot Conductor
Reporting accessibility and technical SEO issues from one crawl to satisfy two different internal ownersnot Conductor
Prioritising a backlog of thousands of technical issues by estimated traffic impact rather than severity labelnot Conductor

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

Conductor

No published dollar amounts for any pricing tier; requires contacting sales or requesting demo to learn costs
Essentials tier limits AI content generation to only 60 drafts per year and covers just 1,000 pages of analysis
Free trial available but pricing model remains opaque until direct sales engagement

Lumar

The crawl allowance is measured in URLs per month, so full crawls of a large site exhaust it quickly and teams end up sampling, which is exactly how regressions escape.
It provides no keyword, ranking or backlink data, so it is always an addition to the SEO budget rather than a consolidation of it.
The pipeline gating that justifies the price needs engineering adoption, and a marketing budget cannot buy that agreement.
Log file analysis is not the core strength it is at Botify, so crawl budget diagnosis on very large sites is weaker.
The 2022 rebrand from DeepCrawl means much of the community knowledge, tutorials and older documentation is filed under the previous name.

Pricing, plan by plan

Conductor

On request

No published plan breakdown. See the Conductor review.

Lumar

On request

Lumar$undefined/year
- Priced by URLs crawled per month
- Protect, Impact and accessibility modules licensed separately
- Annual contract

Which should you pick?

Choose Conductor if

Nothing in the data separates Conductor from Lumar on the points above - pick on price and on how each one feels to use.

Conductor review

Choose Lumar if

You need site crawler.
You work on Web, REST API.
You also want protect.

Lumar review

Questions people ask

Is Conductor or Lumar better?: Neither clearly leads. Conductor starts at On request and Lumar at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, Conductor or Lumar?: Conductor starts at On request and Lumar at On request.
Does Conductor or Lumar run on more platforms?: Conductor runs on Web. Lumar runs on Web, REST API.
What is Conductor best used for?: Conductor is most often used for tracking visibility across chatgpt, perplexity, and gemini, generating seo-optimized content at scale with ai, unifying traditional search and ai answer engine strategies, monitoring competitor positioning in emerging search platforms. Of those, tracking visibility across chatgpt, perplexity, and gemini and generating seo-optimized content at scale with ai are not what Lumar is typically brought in for.
What can Conductor do that Lumar cannot?: Lumar covers Site crawler, Protect, Automation Hub, Accessibility auditing.

Answered from the vendors’ own pages

Conductor: How much does Conductor cost?

Conductor does not publish specific pricing. The platform offers Essentials, Growth, and Enterprise tiers based on usage limits (AI drafts, pages analyzed, keywords tracked, competitors monitored, and websites), but dollar amounts are available only through contacting sales or requesting a demo.

Source

Lumar: Is Lumar the same as DeepCrawl?

Yes, the same company and product line, rebranded in 2022. Older tutorials under the DeepCrawl name still broadly apply.

Conductor: What is Conductor's pricing model?

Conductor uses a usage-based model where you pay based on actual capabilities needed. Plans are defined by limits on AI writing drafts, pages analyzed per year, tracked keywords, competitor tracking, and number of monitored websites rather than per-seat pricing.

Source

Lumar: Can it really block a deployment?

Yes, through Automation Hub integrated into your CI pipeline. Whether your engineering team accepts that gate is the real question.

Conductor: Can I try Conductor before buying?

Yes, Conductor offers a free trial for the Essentials tier. Growth and Enterprise tiers require requesting a demo to see pricing and capabilities.

Source

Lumar: Does it replace Screaming Frog?

For scheduled monitoring and pipeline testing, yes. For quick ad hoc crawls on a laptop, the desktop crawler remains faster and cheaper.

Conductor vs Lumar

Conductor

Lumar

The short version

Where they differ

What each one covers

Only in Conductor

Only in Lumar

What people use each for

Conductor

Lumar

Where each one falls short

Conductor

Lumar

Pricing, plan by plan

Conductor

Lumar

Which should you pick?

Choose Conductor if

Choose Lumar if

Questions people ask

Answered from the vendors’ own pages

Related pages

More on Conductor

More on Lumar

Keep looking

Other head to heads