Softwr

SEO · head to head

Lumar vs Sitebulb

Lumar logo

Lumar

SEO

Website intelligence platform, formerly DeepCrawl, that can fail a build on SEO and accessibility regressions

From
On request
Rated
-
Full reviewWebsite
Sitebulb logo

Sitebulb

SEO

Technical SEO audit tool that crawls sites and generates visual, prioritized hints

From
$95/month
Rated
-
Full reviewWebsite

The short version

  • Each has a real cost: Lumar the crawl allowance is measured in URLs per month, so full crawls of a large site exhaust it quickly and teams end up sampling, which is exactly how regressions escape.; Sitebulb desktop plans are limited to a single user, so teams need Sitebulb Cloud or paid add-on seats to collaborate.
  • They diverge on capability: Lumar covers Site crawler, Sitebulb covers JavaScript crawling.
  • Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which Lumar and Sitebulb actually diverge.

Attributes where Lumar and Sitebulb differ
AttributeLumarSitebulb
Starting priceOn request$95/month
Pricing modelquotesubscription
PlatformsWeb, REST APIweb, windows, mac

Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (SEO).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in Lumar

  • Site crawler
  • Protect
  • Automation Hub
  • Accessibility auditing
  • Monitor
  • Impact

Only in Sitebulb

  • JavaScript crawling
  • Prioritized Hints
  • Crawl maps
  • Scheduled recurring audits
  • Audit comparisons
  • Google integrations

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

Lumar

  • A site deploying weekly that keeps shipping accidental noindex tags and blocked resources into productionnot Sitebulb
  • Comparing crawls before and after a migration to prove what changed rather than what looks wrong nownot Sitebulb
  • Reporting accessibility and technical SEO issues from one crawl to satisfy two different internal ownersnot Sitebulb
  • Prioritising a backlog of thousands of technical issues by estimated traffic impact rather than severity labelnot Sitebulb

Sitebulb

  • Agencies running recurring technical SEO audits for clientsnot Lumar
  • In-house SEO teams tracking site health over timenot Lumar
  • Auditing JavaScript-rendered sites for crawlability issuesnot Lumar
  • Benchmarking site architecture via crawl visualizationsnot Lumar

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

Lumar

  • The crawl allowance is measured in URLs per month, so full crawls of a large site exhaust it quickly and teams end up sampling, which is exactly how regressions escape.
  • It provides no keyword, ranking or backlink data, so it is always an addition to the SEO budget rather than a consolidation of it.
  • The pipeline gating that justifies the price needs engineering adoption, and a marketing budget cannot buy that agreement.
  • Log file analysis is not the core strength it is at Botify, so crawl budget diagnosis on very large sites is weaker.
  • The 2022 rebrand from DeepCrawl means much of the community knowledge, tutorials and older documentation is filed under the previous name.

Sitebulb

  • Desktop plans are limited to a single user, so teams need Sitebulb Cloud or paid add-on seats to collaborate.
  • Large sites near or above the 500,000 URL Pro limit require reconfiguration or the Cloud tier to avoid hitting crawl caps.
  • Desktop crawling relies on local machine resources, so audit speed and scale depend on the user's hardware rather than cloud infrastructure.

Pricing, plan by plan

Lumar

On request
  • Lumar$undefined/year
    • Priced by URLs crawled per month
    • Protect, Impact and accessibility modules licensed separately
    • Annual contract

Sitebulb

$95/month
  • Lite$undefined/month
    • 1 user
    • 10,000 URLs per audit
    • 100+ Hints
  • Pro$undefined/month
    • 1 user
    • 500,000 URLs per audit
    • 300+ Hints
  • Sitebulb Cloud$undefined/month
    • 2+ users
    • No project limits
    • Automated recurring crawls

Which should you pick?

Choose Lumar if

  • You need site crawler.
  • You work on Web, REST API.
  • You also want protect.
Lumar review

Choose Sitebulb if

  • You need javascript crawling.
  • You work on web, windows, mac.
  • You also want prioritized hints.
Sitebulb review

Questions people ask

Is Lumar or Sitebulb better?
Neither clearly leads. Lumar starts at On request and Sitebulb at $95/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, Lumar or Sitebulb?
Lumar starts at On request and Sitebulb at $95/month.
Does Lumar or Sitebulb run on more platforms?
Lumar runs on Web, REST API. Sitebulb runs on web, windows, mac.
What is Lumar best used for?
Lumar is most often used for a site deploying weekly that keeps shipping accidental noindex tags and blocked resources into production, comparing crawls before and after a migration to prove what changed rather than what looks wrong now, reporting accessibility and technical seo issues from one crawl to satisfy two different internal owners, prioritising a backlog of thousands of technical issues by estimated traffic impact rather than severity label. Of those, a site deploying weekly that keeps shipping accidental noindex tags and blocked resources into production and comparing crawls before and after a migration to prove what changed rather than what looks wrong now are not what Sitebulb is typically brought in for.
What can Lumar do that Sitebulb cannot?
Lumar covers Site crawler, Protect, Automation Hub, Accessibility auditing. Sitebulb covers JavaScript crawling, Prioritized Hints, Crawl maps, Scheduled recurring audits.

Answered from the vendors’ own pages

Lumar: Is Lumar the same as DeepCrawl?

Yes, the same company and product line, rebranded in 2022. Older tutorials under the DeepCrawl name still broadly apply.

Sitebulb: Is there a free trial?

Sitebulb offers a 14-day free trial with no credit card required and no up-front commitment.

Source
Lumar: Can it really block a deployment?

Yes, through Automation Hub integrated into your CI pipeline. Whether your engineering team accepts that gate is the real question.

Sitebulb: Can I cancel anytime?

Yes, subscriptions can be cancelled anytime and users are never locked into a contract.

Source
Lumar: Does it replace Screaming Frog?

For scheduled monitoring and pipeline testing, yes. For quick ad hoc crawls on a laptop, the desktop crawler remains faster and cheaper.

Sitebulb: What does Sitebulb integrate with?

Sitebulb connects to Google Analytics, Google Search Console, Google Sheets, and Google Data Studio to pull data into audit reports.

Source
Share

Related pages

More on Lumar

More on Sitebulb

Keep looking

Other head to heads