Lumarvs
Screaming Frog SEO Spider


Screaming Frog SEO Spider: A fraction of the cost for ad hoc crawling when scheduled monitoring is not required

Website intelligence platform, formerly DeepCrawl, that can fail a build on SEO and accessibility regressions
As of 31 August 2026, Lumar's pricing is not published; the vendor quotes on request. Lumar is the crawler previously sold as DeepCrawl, extended so that its tests can run inside a deployment pipeline and block a release that breaks indexability. Softwr lists it under SEO. Lumar is available on Web, API.
Overview
Lumar is a London company founded in 2010, known as DeepCrawl until it rebranded in 2022. The product crawls large sites, compares crawls over time, and reports technical issues against indexability, site structure, page speed data and, since 2023, accessibility rules. Reports are organised so that regressions between crawls are the primary view rather than an absolute list of issues. The distinguishing capability is Protect, which runs crawl-based test suites automatically and can be wired into a continuous integration pipeline through the Automation Hub so that a deployment introducing noindex tags, broken canonicals or blocked resources fails the build. This moves SEO from monthly reporting to release gating, which is the only mechanism that reliably prevents technical regressions on sites that deploy weekly. The catch is that the value depends entirely on an engineering team agreeing to adopt the gate, and marketing teams cannot deliver that agreement by buying the licence. Buyers are enterprise and large mid-market sites with frequent deployments, often ecommerce or publishing, and pricing is based on URLs crawled per month. The trade-off is scope: there is no keyword, ranking or backlink data, so Lumar is bought alongside another subscription, and the crawl allowance is consumed quickly by full crawls of very large sites, which pushes teams towards partial crawls that then miss the regressions they bought the tool to catch.
The honest half
Concrete and checkable, so you can decide whether any of them matter to you. This is the half of a review a vendor will not write about Lumar.
Cross-shopped
Each pairing was judged by two reviewers asking whether a buyer would genuinely weigh the two against each other. The ones that failed were deleted rather than published.


Screaming Frog SEO Spider: A fraction of the cost for ad hoc crawling when scheduled monitoring is not required


Conductor: Broader platform including content and keyword data rather than crawling alone


Sitebulb: Stronger issue explanation and visualisation for smaller teams and agencies
Pricing
Taken from the vendor's own pricing page. Prices move, so check before you buy.
Lumar
On request
Capabilities
Site crawler
Large-scale crawling with configurable depth, rendering and crawl comparison between runs
Protect
Automated test suites that pass or fail against defined SEO health rules
Automation Hub
Integration of crawl tests into CI/CD pipelines to gate deployments
Accessibility auditing
WCAG-based checks reported alongside technical SEO issues
Monitor
Scheduled crawls with alerting on regressions rather than absolute issue counts
Impact
Prioritisation of issues by estimated traffic and revenue consequence
Answered, with sources
Each answer names the page it came from, so you can check it rather than take our word for it.
Yes, the same company and product line, rebranded in 2022. Older tutorials under the DeepCrawl name still broadly apply.
Yes, through Automation Hub integrated into your CI pipeline. Whether your engineering team accepts that gate is the real question.
For scheduled monitoring and pipeline testing, yes. For quick ad hoc crawls on a laptop, the desktop crawler remains faster and cheaper.
Keep looking
Desktop crawler for technical SEO audits and site analysis
Technical SEO audit tool that crawls sites and generates visual, prioritized hints
Technical SEO crawler that joins crawl data with server log files
Enterprise technical SEO platform that also renders pages for search bots when engineering cannot
Rank tracking with SEO forecasting and market share modelling built in
Keyword and content ideation tool that visualizes search questions and phrases
Slovenia-built rank tracker with agency white-labelling and AI answer tracking bundled into every plan
Enterprise SEO platform with unlimited users on every plan, priced on data volume instead of seats
AI keyword clustering tool that groups keywords by live SERP overlap
Backlink monitoring tool for teams that only want link alerts, not a full SEO suite
German SEO toolbox built around a domain Visibility Index measured weekly since 2008
Technical SEO crawler that joins crawl data with server log files
Google's free tool for monitoring how a site appears in Search
Softwr does not host reviews and shows no star rating for Lumar, because a rating we did not collect is not ours to publish. What is here is the pricing and platform detail from the vendor’s own pages, limitations we could state concretely, and alternatives a reviewer confirmed people weigh against it. Tell us if any of it is wrong.
What people switch to, and what they give up
Every tier, and where the cost actually lands
Put it head to head with anything we hold
Its rating, and an embed for your own site
Backlink monitoring tool for teams that only want link alerts, not a full SEO suite
Per month by tracked domains and backlinksDaily rank tracking built for speed and large keyword volumes
Per month by tracked keyword countA bundle of five simplified SEO tools including KWFinder and SERPWatcher
Per month by usage volumeGoogle's free tool for monitoring how a site appears in Search
Open source, no licence feeSlovenia-built rank tracker with agency white-labelling and AI answer tracking bundled into every plan
Per month by tracked keywords, sites and AI usage volumeAI keyword clustering tool that groups keywords by live SERP overlap
Per month by credit volume, with pay-as-you-go availableRank tracking with SEO forecasting and market share modelling built in
Per month by tracked keyword count