Customer Support · head to head
Chatwoot vs Woodpecker

Chatwoot
Customer Support
Open-source customer engagement platform
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes

Woodpecker
CRM
Cold email and LinkedIn outreach automation platform with pay-per-use pricing
- From
- $7/month
- Free plan
- No
The short version
- Only Chatwoot has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Chatwoot free plan limited to 2 agents and 500 conversations per month; Woodpecker linkedIn outreach, extra warm-ups and API access are all separate paid add-ons rather than bundled features.
- They diverge on capability: Chatwoot covers Live chat, Woodpecker covers Cold email sequencing.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Chatwoot and Woodpecker actually diverge.
| Attribute | Chatwoot | Woodpecker |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free | $7/month |
| Pricing model | Unknown | usage-based |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Platforms | Web, Cloud, Self-hosted | web, api |
| Category | Customer Support | CRM |
| Founded | 2017 | 2015 |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Chatwoot
- Live chat
- Email inbox
- Social channels
- Knowledge base
- Chatbots
- Reports
- Slack
Only in Woodpecker
- Cold email sequencing
- Email verification
- Deliverability warm-up
- Lead Finder
- Agency panel
- API and integrations
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Chatwoot
- Self-hosted supportnot Woodpecker
- Privacy-first chatnot Woodpecker
- Multi-channel supportnot Woodpecker
Woodpecker
- Running personalized one-to-one cold email campaignsnot Chatwoot
- Agencies managing outreach across multiple client accountsnot Chatwoot
- Verifying catch-all email addresses before sendingnot Chatwoot
- Adding LinkedIn outreach on top of an existing email campaignnot Chatwoot
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Chatwoot
- Free plan limited to 2 agents and 500 conversations per month
- Self-hosted option requires managing infrastructure, updates, and external messaging costs
- Smaller ecosystem and community compared to Zendesk or Intercom
- AI features require credit consumption and additional configuration
Woodpecker
- LinkedIn outreach, extra warm-ups and API access are all separate paid add-ons rather than bundled features.
- Pay-per-contacted-prospect pricing can be harder to predict than flat per-seat plans at high volume.
- Exceeding the contacted-prospect limit halts new sends until the plan is topped up.
- Lacks the built-in calling/SMS channels that some multichannel competitors offer.
Pricing, plan by plan
Chatwoot
Free- HackerFree
- 2 agents
- 500 conversations per month
- 1 live chat channel
- Startups$19/month
- Unlimited agents
- Unlimited conversations
Woodpecker
$7/month- Pay-per-use$7/month
- $7 per 100 contacted prospects
- Unlimited team members and email accounts
- 4 warm-ups monthly
Which should you pick?
Choose Chatwoot if
- You need live chat.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Cloud, Self-hosted.
- You also want email inbox.
Choose Woodpecker if
- You need cold email sequencing.
- You work on web, api.
- You also want email verification.
Questions people ask
- Is Chatwoot or Woodpecker better?
- Neither clearly leads. Chatwoot starts at Free and Woodpecker at $7/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Chatwoot or Woodpecker?
- Chatwoot has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Chatwoot and $7/month for Woodpecker.
- Does Chatwoot or Woodpecker run on more platforms?
- Chatwoot runs on Web, Cloud, Self-hosted. Woodpecker runs on web, api.
- Can I use Chatwoot for free?
- Yes. Chatwoot has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Woodpecker starts at $7/month.
- What is Chatwoot best used for?
- Chatwoot is most often used for self-hosted support, privacy-first chat, multi-channel support. Of those, self-hosted support and privacy-first chat are not what Woodpecker is typically brought in for.
- What can Chatwoot do that Woodpecker cannot?
- Chatwoot covers Live chat, Email inbox, Social channels, Knowledge base. Woodpecker covers Cold email sequencing, Email verification, Deliverability warm-up, Lead Finder.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Chatwoot: Does Chatwoot offer a self-hosted option?
Yes. Chatwoot provides both cloud-hosted and self-hosted versions. Self-hosting is free with the open-source version, though you handle infrastructure, maintenance, and external messaging costs.
SourceWoodpecker: What does Woodpecker cost?
Woodpecker charges $7 per 100 contacted prospects per month (discounted heavily on annual billing), with add-ons like LinkedIn outreach at $29/month per account and extra warm-ups at $5/month each.
SourceChatwoot: What communication channels does Chatwoot support?
Chatwoot supports email, live chat, WhatsApp, Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, and other social media channels consolidated into a single inbox.
SourceWoodpecker: Is there a free plan, and what are its limits?
Woodpecker offers a 14-day free trial with full features, capped at 14 days or 100 emails sent, whichever comes first; the trial can be extended by contacting support.
SourceChatwoot: Is there a free plan for Chatwoot?
Yes. Chatwoot offers a free Hacker plan supporting up to 2 agents, 500 conversations per month, and one live chat channel.
SourceWoodpecker: How is usage metered?
Usage is metered by the number of prospects contacted per month; exceeding the plan's contacted-prospect limit halts new email sends, and exceeding the stored prospect limit prevents adding new leads.
SourceChatwoot: What AI features does Chatwoot include?
Chatwoot includes Captain AI agent for automated responses, Copilot for smart reply suggestions, and live translation features.
SourceWoodpecker: What does Woodpecker integrate with?
Woodpecker integrates with Pipedrive, HubSpot, Zoho, Calendly, Zapier, Google Sheets, and offers an API, CLI, webhooks and an MCP server for custom workflows.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Chatwoot vs Re:amaze
- Chatwoot vs Missive
- Chatwoot vs LiveAgent
- Chatwoot vs HelpCrunch
- Chatwoot vs Customerly
- Chatwoot vs Help Scout
- Chatwoot vs Freshdesk
- Chatwoot vs Groove
- Chatwoot vs Richpanel
- Chatwoot vs Sprinklr Service
- Chatwoot vs Dixa
- Chatwoot vs SupportBee
- Chatwoot vs RingCentral Contact Center
- Chatwoot vs UJET
- Chatwoot vs UserVoice
- Chatwoot vs Verint
- Chatwoot vs lemlist
- Chatwoot vs Reply.io
- Chatwoot vs Hunter
- Chatwoot vs Snov.io
- Chatwoot vs UpLead
- Chatwoot vs Apollo.io
- Chatwoot vs Seamless.AI
- Chatwoot vs Kylas
- Chatwoot vs OnePageCRM
- Chatwoot vs Outreach
- Chatwoot vs Apptivo
- Chatwoot vs EspoCRM
- Chatwoot vs Clay
- Chatwoot vs Lusha
- Chatwoot vs LeadSquared
- Chatwoot vs Vtiger
- Chatwoot vs Bitrix24
- Chatwoot vs Clearbit
- Woodpecker vs Re:amaze
- Woodpecker vs Missive
- Woodpecker vs LiveAgent
- Woodpecker vs HelpCrunch
- Woodpecker vs Customerly
- Woodpecker vs Help Scout
- Woodpecker vs Freshdesk
- Woodpecker vs Groove
- Woodpecker vs Richpanel
- Woodpecker vs Sprinklr Service
- Woodpecker vs Dixa
- Woodpecker vs SupportBee
- Woodpecker vs RingCentral Contact Center
- Woodpecker vs UJET
- Woodpecker vs UserVoice
- Woodpecker vs Verint
- Woodpecker vs lemlist
- Woodpecker vs Reply.io
- Woodpecker vs Hunter
- Woodpecker vs Snov.io
- Woodpecker vs UpLead
- Woodpecker vs Apollo.io
- Woodpecker vs Seamless.AI
- Woodpecker vs Kylas
- Woodpecker vs OnePageCRM
- Woodpecker vs Outreach
- Woodpecker vs Apptivo
- Woodpecker vs EspoCRM
- Woodpecker vs Clay
- Woodpecker vs Lusha
- Woodpecker vs LeadSquared
- Woodpecker vs Vtiger
- Woodpecker vs Bitrix24
- Woodpecker vs Clearbit
