Customer Support · head to head
UJET vs Woodpecker

UJET
Customer Support
Mobile-first cloud contact centre that publishes per-seat list prices and runs on Google Cloud
- From
- $65/month
- Free plan
- No

Woodpecker
CRM
Cold email and LinkedIn outreach automation platform with pay-per-use pricing
- From
- $7/month
- Free plan
- No
The short version
- Each has a real cost: UJET the published tier prices exclude nearly every channel, so chat, email, SMS and social cost 10 USD per seat each on top and conversational AI is quoted separately, meaning a realistic omnichannel seat lands well above the advertised 99 USD.; Woodpecker linkedIn outreach, extra warm-ups and API access are all separate paid add-ons rather than bundled features.
- They diverge on capability: UJET covers Smartphone-native channels, Woodpecker covers Cold email sequencing.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which UJET and Woodpecker actually diverge.
| Attribute | UJET | Woodpecker |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $65/month | $7/month |
| Pricing model | Per user per month | usage-based |
| Platforms | Web, iOS, Android, API | web, api |
| Category | Customer Support | CRM |
| Founded | Unknown | 2015 |
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in UJET
- Smartphone-native channels
- Omnichannel routing
- Google CCAI integration
- Agent workspace
- Biometric and device authentication
- Co-browse
- Outbound dialler
- Workforce management add-on
Only in Woodpecker
- Cold email sequencing
- Email verification
- Deliverability warm-up
- Lead Finder
- Agency panel
- API and integrations
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
UJET
- A consumer app company whose support cases are resolved faster when the customer can attach a photo or screen recording from the phone they are already holdingnot Woodpecker
- A Google Cloud shop that wants Dialogflow CX bots and a contact centre on the same platform without stitching two vendors togethernot Woodpecker
- A retail or utilities contact centre that needs verified caller identity without knowledge-based authentication questionsnot Woodpecker
- A support organisation of 100 to 600 seats that wants a published per-seat list price to benchmark against a Genesys or NICE renewal quotenot Woodpecker
Woodpecker
- Running personalized one-to-one cold email campaignsnot UJET
- Agencies managing outreach across multiple client accountsnot UJET
- Verifying catch-all email addresses before sendingnot UJET
- Adding LinkedIn outreach on top of an existing email campaignnot UJET
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
UJET
- The published tier prices exclude nearly every channel, so chat, email, SMS and social cost 10 USD per seat each on top and conversational AI is quoted separately, meaning a realistic omnichannel seat lands well above the advertised 99 USD.
- Workforce management is a 30 USD per seat add-on rather than a platform capability, so a contact centre buying UJET for its full stack pays roughly a third again on top of the Pro rate before any AI.
- UJET supplies the technology behind Google Cloud Contact Center AI Platform while Google simultaneously expands its own Customer Engagement Suite, a partner-competitor overlap that analysts have publicly warned could cannibalise UJET, and it introduces roadmap risk into a multi-year contract.
- The smartphone-native premise only pays off if your customers actually contact you from a mobile app you control; organisations whose volume arrives by inbound telephone number from landlines and desktop web get little benefit from the differentiating features.
- UJET is materially smaller than NICE, Genesys and Five9, so the partner and consultancy ecosystem for complex integrations, custom reporting and specialist routing design is thinner, and niche requirements more often become professional services line items.
- UJET sold its own professional services business unit to Onix in July 2025, so implementation and services delivery on a new contract may run through a third party rather than the vendor itself, which changes who is accountable when a deployment slips.
Woodpecker
- LinkedIn outreach, extra warm-ups and API access are all separate paid add-ons rather than bundled features.
- Pay-per-contacted-prospect pricing can be harder to predict than flat per-seat plans at high volume.
- Exceeding the contacted-prospect limit halts new sends until the plan is topped up.
- Lacks the built-in calling/SMS channels that some multichannel competitors offer.
Pricing, plan by plan
UJET
$65/month- Basic$65/month
- Voice
- Agent workspace
- Standard routing
- Digital$69/month
- Digital channels
- Agent workspace
- Routing
- Pro$99/month
- Everything in Basic
- Advanced routing
- Advanced reporting
- Enterprise$120/month
- Everything in Pro
- Enterprise security controls
- SSO
Woodpecker
$7/month- Pay-per-use$7/month
- $7 per 100 contacted prospects
- Unlimited team members and email accounts
- 4 warm-ups monthly
Which should you pick?
Choose UJET if
- You need smartphone-native channels.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android, API.
- You also want omnichannel routing.
Choose Woodpecker if
- You need cold email sequencing.
- You work on web, api.
- You also want email verification.
Questions people ask
- Is UJET or Woodpecker better?
- Neither clearly leads. UJET starts at $65/month and Woodpecker at $7/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, UJET or Woodpecker?
- UJET starts at $65/month and Woodpecker at $7/month.
- Does UJET or Woodpecker run on more platforms?
- UJET runs on Web, iOS, Android, API. Woodpecker runs on web, api.
- What is UJET best used for?
- UJET is most often used for a consumer app company whose support cases are resolved faster when the customer can attach a photo or screen recording from the phone they are already holding, a google cloud shop that wants dialogflow cx bots and a contact centre on the same platform without stitching two vendors together, a retail or utilities contact centre that needs verified caller identity without knowledge-based authentication questions, a support organisation of 100 to 600 seats that wants a published per-seat list price to benchmark against a genesys or nice renewal quote. Of those, a consumer app company whose support cases are resolved faster when the customer can attach a photo or screen recording from the phone they are already holding and a google cloud shop that wants dialogflow cx bots and a contact centre on the same platform without stitching two vendors together are not what Woodpecker is typically brought in for.
- What can UJET do that Woodpecker cannot?
- UJET covers Smartphone-native channels, Omnichannel routing, Google CCAI integration, Agent workspace. Woodpecker covers Cold email sequencing, Email verification, Deliverability warm-up, Lead Finder.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
UJET: Is UJET the same product as Google Cloud Contact Center AI Platform?
Effectively yes at the platform layer. Google resells UJET technology under its own brand, which is why Dialogflow integration is native rather than bolted on.
Woodpecker: What does Woodpecker cost?
Woodpecker charges $7 per 100 contacted prospects per month (discounted heavily on annual billing), with add-ons like LinkedIn outreach at $29/month per account and extra warm-ups at $5/month each.
SourceUJET: What does a realistic omnichannel seat cost?
Add the channel add-ons to the tier price. Pro at 99 USD plus chat, email, SMS and social at 10 USD each is 139 USD per seat per month before any AI or workforce management.
Woodpecker: Is there a free plan, and what are its limits?
Woodpecker offers a 14-day free trial with full features, capped at 14 days or 100 emails sent, whichever comes first; the trial can be extended by contacting support.
SourceUJET: Does UJET include workforce management?
No. It is a separate add-on at 30 USD per user per month, so many buyers pair UJET with a dedicated WFM tool instead.
Woodpecker: How is usage metered?
Usage is metered by the number of prospects contacted per month; exceeding the plan's contacted-prospect limit halts new email sends, and exceeding the stored prospect limit prevents adding new leads.
SourceUJET: How large a contact centre does it suit?
It is realistic from roughly 50 seats upward, and most commonly deployed in the 100 to 600 seat range rather than at several-thousand-seat scale.
Woodpecker: What does Woodpecker integrate with?
Woodpecker integrates with Pipedrive, HubSpot, Zoho, Calendly, Zapier, Google Sheets, and offers an API, CLI, webhooks and an MCP server for custom workflows.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- UJET vs Amazon Connect
- UJET vs Ameyo
- UJET vs Observe.AI
- UJET vs Plain
- UJET vs Richpanel
- UJET vs Kapture CX
- UJET vs Zendesk
- UJET vs Salesforce Service Cloud
- UJET vs Sprinklr Service
- UJET vs Zoho Desk
- UJET vs Alvaria
- UJET vs Cresta
- UJET vs Gladly
- UJET vs HappyFox
- UJET vs Help Scout
- UJET vs Hiver
- UJET vs HubSpot Service Hub
- UJET vs lemlist
- UJET vs Reply.io
- UJET vs Hunter
- UJET vs Snov.io
- UJET vs UpLead
- UJET vs Apollo.io
- UJET vs Seamless.AI
- UJET vs Kylas
- UJET vs OnePageCRM
- UJET vs Outreach
- UJET vs Apptivo
- UJET vs EspoCRM
- UJET vs Clay
- UJET vs Lusha
- UJET vs LeadSquared
- UJET vs Vtiger
- UJET vs Bitrix24
- UJET vs Clearbit
- Woodpecker vs Amazon Connect
- Woodpecker vs Ameyo
- Woodpecker vs Observe.AI
- Woodpecker vs Plain
- Woodpecker vs Richpanel
- Woodpecker vs Kapture CX
- Woodpecker vs Zendesk
- Woodpecker vs Salesforce Service Cloud
- Woodpecker vs Sprinklr Service
- Woodpecker vs Zoho Desk
- Woodpecker vs Alvaria
- Woodpecker vs Cresta
- Woodpecker vs Gladly
- Woodpecker vs HappyFox
- Woodpecker vs Help Scout
- Woodpecker vs Hiver
- Woodpecker vs HubSpot Service Hub
- Woodpecker vs lemlist
- Woodpecker vs Reply.io
- Woodpecker vs Hunter
- Woodpecker vs Snov.io
- Woodpecker vs UpLead
- Woodpecker vs Apollo.io
- Woodpecker vs Seamless.AI
- Woodpecker vs Kylas
- Woodpecker vs OnePageCRM
- Woodpecker vs Outreach
- Woodpecker vs Apptivo
- Woodpecker vs EspoCRM
- Woodpecker vs Clay
- Woodpecker vs Lusha
- Woodpecker vs LeadSquared
- Woodpecker vs Vtiger
- Woodpecker vs Bitrix24
- Woodpecker vs Clearbit
