Softwr

Email Marketing · head to head

Brevo vs Sailthru

Brevo logo

Brevo

Email Marketing

Email, SMS, and CRM in one platform

From
Free
Rated
-
Sailthru logo

Sailthru

Email Marketing

Retail and publisher email personalisation, now one product inside the Marigold portfolio

From
On request
Rated
-

The short version

  • Only Brevo has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
  • Each has a real cost: Brevo paid plans are priced by email volume sent per month, with higher tiers running past $100 per month as list and send volume grows; Sailthru the product sits in a portfolio with several overlapping platforms under one owner, so roadmap investment is a portfolio decision rather than a product decision and is worth asking about in writing.
  • Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which Brevo and Sailthru actually diverge.

Attributes where Brevo and Sailthru differ
AttributeBrevoSailthru
Starting priceFreeOn request
Pricing modelfreemiumquote
Free tierYesNo
PlatformsWebWeb, REST API

Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Email Marketing).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in Brevo

Nothing recorded that Sailthru does not also cover.

Only in Sailthru

  • Interest profiles
  • Personalisation engine
  • Prediction Manager
  • Site personalisation
  • Zephyr templating
  • Lifecycle optimiser

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

Brevo

  • Email marketing campaigns with drag-and-drop editornot Sailthru
  • SMS and WhatsApp multichannel messagingnot Sailthru
  • Customer loyalty program managementnot Sailthru
  • Transactional email and API-triggered messagingnot Sailthru

Sailthru

  • A publisher sending a personalised daily newsletter assembled per reader from a content cataloguenot Brevo
  • A retailer that wants email and on-site recommendations driven by the same affinity modelnot Brevo
  • High-cadence sending where per-recipient content assembly matters more than journey branchingnot Brevo
  • Teams that want churn and lifetime value scores available as native campaign conditions rather than imported fieldsnot Brevo

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

Brevo

  • Paid plans are priced by email volume sent per month, with higher tiers running past $100 per month as list and send volume grows

Sailthru

  • The product sits in a portfolio with several overlapping platforms under one owner, so roadmap investment is a portfolio decision rather than a product decision and is worth asking about in writing.
  • Pricing counts stored profiles, so retained inactive readers keep costing money long after they stopped opening anything.
  • On-site personalisation requires a developer to implement the JavaScript and maintain the content feed, which puts the highest-value feature behind engineering time.
  • Zephyr is a proprietary templating language, so template maintenance skills are scarce compared with the Liquid syntax used by most competitors.
  • It is built for high-cadence content and retail sending, and B2B lifecycle programmes with long sales cycles sit poorly on the model.

Pricing, plan by plan

Brevo

Free

No published plan breakdown. See the Brevo review.

Sailthru

On request
  • Sailthru$undefined/year
    • Priced on stored profiles and send volume
    • Site personalisation and prediction features licensed by module
    • Annual contract through Marigold

Which should you pick?

Choose Brevo if

  • You want to start without paying.

Choose Sailthru if

  • You need interest profiles.
  • You work on Web, REST API.
  • You also want personalisation engine.

Questions people ask

Is Brevo or Sailthru better?
Neither clearly leads. Brevo starts at Free and Sailthru at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, Brevo or Sailthru?
Brevo has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Brevo and On request for Sailthru.
Does Brevo or Sailthru run on more platforms?
Brevo runs on Web. Sailthru runs on Web, REST API.
Can I use Brevo for free?
Yes. Brevo has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Sailthru starts at On request.
What is Brevo best used for?
Brevo is most often used for email marketing campaigns with drag-and-drop editor, sms and whatsapp multichannel messaging, customer loyalty program management, transactional email and api-triggered messaging. Of those, email marketing campaigns with drag-and-drop editor and sms and whatsapp multichannel messaging are not what Sailthru is typically brought in for.
What can Brevo do that Sailthru cannot?
Sailthru covers Interest profiles, Personalisation engine, Prediction Manager, Site personalisation.

Answered from the vendors’ own pages

Brevo: Does Brevo offer a free plan?

Yes, Brevo offers a free tier with no credit card required. You can launch marketing campaigns, access templates, and use basic automation without paying.

Source
Sailthru: Who owns Sailthru now?

Marigold, formerly CM Group, which also owns Campaign Monitor, Emma, Selligent, Liveclicker and Cheetah Digital.

Brevo: What pricing model does Brevo use?

Brevo uses a freemium model. No specific pricing rates are published on their main website. Users must navigate to the pricing page or contact sales to see tiered pricing based on email volume and features needed.

Source
Sailthru: Does that affect the roadmap?

It can. Overlapping products in one portfolio compete for investment, so ask which platform is the strategic one for your segment before signing multi-year.

Brevo: What channels does Brevo support?

Brevo supports email, SMS, WhatsApp, web and mobile push notifications, live chat, chatbot, wallet, phone, and transactional messaging across all plans.

Source
Sailthru: Is it worth it just for newsletters?

For personalised daily newsletters at publisher scale it remains one of the strongest options. For simple broadcast sending it is heavily over-specified.

Share

Related pages

Other head to heads