Email Marketing · head to head
Attentive vs Sailthru

Attentive
Email Marketing
Enterprise SMS and email marketing for retail brands, sold on quarterly minimum spend commitments
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Sailthru
Email Marketing
Retail and publisher email personalisation, now one product inside the Marigold portfolio
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Attentive minimum spend commitments are use it or lose it: if quarterly usage falls short, the shortfall is invoiced anyway, which makes Attentive expensive for any brand whose sending is seasonal rather than even.; Sailthru the product sits in a portfolio with several overlapping platforms under one owner, so roadmap investment is a portfolio decision rather than a product decision and is worth asking about in writing.
- They diverge on capability: Attentive covers SMS-first journeys, Sailthru covers Interest profiles.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Attentive and Sailthru actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (On request), pricing model (quote), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Email Marketing).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Attentive
- SMS-first journeys
- Two-tap sign-up units
- TCPA compliance tooling
- Email channel
- Revenue attribution
- Concierge
- Identity resolution
- Negotiated order form rates
Only in Sailthru
- Interest profiles
- Personalisation engine
- Prediction Manager
- Site personalisation
- Zephyr templating
- Lifecycle optimiser
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Attentive
- A direct-to-consumer brand where SMS is the primary revenue channel and needs cart abandonment triggered within minutes of a sessionnot Sailthru
- A retailer capturing in-store phone numbers at the till and needing TCPA-compliant consent records to go with themnot Sailthru
- A consumer brand running SMS and email from one audience so subscribers are not messaged twice for the same promotionnot Sailthru
- A high-volume merchant with predictable year-round send patterns that can commit to a quarterly minimum and negotiate rates down against itnot Sailthru
Sailthru
- A publisher sending a personalised daily newsletter assembled per reader from a content cataloguenot Attentive
- A retailer that wants email and on-site recommendations driven by the same affinity modelnot Attentive
- High-cadence sending where per-recipient content assembly matters more than journey branchingnot Attentive
- Teams that want churn and lifetime value scores available as native campaign conditions rather than imported fieldsnot Attentive
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Attentive
- Minimum spend commitments are use it or lose it: if quarterly usage falls short, the shortfall is invoiced anyway, which makes Attentive expensive for any brand whose sending is seasonal rather than even.
- No rates are published anywhere, so a buyer cannot benchmark a quote before entering a sales process, and the effective per message cost is only visible once an order form is drafted.
- Contracts commonly run six to twelve months, so a brand that finds performance disappointing after two months still owes the balance of the term.
- Total cost combines a platform fee, per message SMS and MMS charges and carrier pass-through fees, and MMS at two to five cents per message means image-heavy campaigns cost several times what the SMS rate suggests.
- It is priced and built for established consumer brands, and the entry commitment puts it out of reach of small merchants that Postscript and similar tools serve on usage-based plans with no floor.
Sailthru
- The product sits in a portfolio with several overlapping platforms under one owner, so roadmap investment is a portfolio decision rather than a product decision and is worth asking about in writing.
- Pricing counts stored profiles, so retained inactive readers keep costing money long after they stopped opening anything.
- On-site personalisation requires a developer to implement the JavaScript and maintain the content feed, which puts the highest-value feature behind engineering time.
- Zephyr is a proprietary templating language, so template maintenance skills are scarce compared with the Liquid syntax used by most competitors.
- It is built for high-cadence content and retail sending, and B2B lifecycle programmes with long sales cycles sit poorly on the model.
Pricing, plan by plan
Attentive
On request- Attentive$undefined/year
- No public rate card; rates are set in an individual order form
- Platform fee plus per message SMS and MMS charges
- Contracts commonly six to twelve months
Sailthru
On request- Sailthru$undefined/year
- Priced on stored profiles and send volume
- Site personalisation and prediction features licensed by module
- Annual contract through Marigold
Which should you pick?
Choose Attentive if
- You need sms-first journeys.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want two-tap sign-up units.
Choose Sailthru if
- You need interest profiles.
- You work on Web, REST API.
- You also want personalisation engine.
Questions people ask
- Is Attentive or Sailthru better?
- Neither clearly leads. Attentive starts at On request and Sailthru at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Attentive or Sailthru?
- Attentive starts at On request and Sailthru at On request.
- Does Attentive or Sailthru run on more platforms?
- Attentive runs on Web, iOS, Android. Sailthru runs on Web, REST API.
- What is Attentive best used for?
- Attentive is most often used for a direct-to-consumer brand where sms is the primary revenue channel and needs cart abandonment triggered within minutes of a session, a retailer capturing in-store phone numbers at the till and needing tcpa-compliant consent records to go with them, a consumer brand running sms and email from one audience so subscribers are not messaged twice for the same promotion, a high-volume merchant with predictable year-round send patterns that can commit to a quarterly minimum and negotiate rates down against it. Of those, a direct-to-consumer brand where sms is the primary revenue channel and needs cart abandonment triggered within minutes of a session and a retailer capturing in-store phone numbers at the till and needing tcpa-compliant consent records to go with them are not what Sailthru is typically brought in for.
- What can Attentive do that Sailthru cannot?
- Attentive covers SMS-first journeys, Two-tap sign-up units, TCPA compliance tooling, Email channel. Sailthru covers Interest profiles, Personalisation engine, Prediction Manager, Site personalisation.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Attentive: How much does Attentive cost?
It does not publish rates. Costs are a platform fee plus per message charges set in your order form, with minimum spend commitments commonly around 2,000 to 3,000 USD per quarter.
Sailthru: Who owns Sailthru now?
Marigold, formerly CM Group, which also owns Campaign Monitor, Emma, Selligent, Liveclicker and Cheetah Digital.
Attentive: What happens if I do not use my minimum?
You are invoiced for the shortfall at the end of the quarter. Unused commitment is not carried forward.
Sailthru: Does that affect the roadmap?
It can. Overlapping products in one portfolio compete for investment, so ask which platform is the strategic one for your segment before signing multi-year.
Attentive: How long is the contract?
Typically six to twelve months, billed monthly or quarterly.
Sailthru: Is it worth it just for newsletters?
For personalised daily newsletters at publisher scale it remains one of the strongest options. For simple broadcast sending it is heavily over-specified.
Attentive: Does it do email as well as SMS?
Yes, with shared audiences and journeys, though the product was designed SMS-first and that remains its strength.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Attentive vs Klaviyo
- Attentive vs Omnisend
- Attentive vs Dotdigital
- Attentive vs Moosend
- Attentive vs SAP Emarsys
- Attentive vs Ortto
- Attentive vs Flodesk
- Attentive vs Sendy
- Attentive vs Brevo
- Attentive vs ActiveCampaign
- Attentive vs EmailOctopus
- Attentive vs RD Station Marketing
- Attentive vs Shortwave
- Attentive vs Zoho Campaigns
- Attentive vs AWeber
- Attentive vs Amazon SES
- Sailthru vs Klaviyo
- Sailthru vs Omnisend
- Sailthru vs Dotdigital
- Sailthru vs Moosend
- Sailthru vs SAP Emarsys
- Sailthru vs Ortto
- Sailthru vs Flodesk
- Sailthru vs Sendy
- Sailthru vs Brevo
- Sailthru vs ActiveCampaign
- Sailthru vs EmailOctopus
- Sailthru vs RD Station Marketing
- Sailthru vs Shortwave
- Sailthru vs Zoho Campaigns
- Sailthru vs AWeber
- Sailthru vs Amazon SES
