Cybersecurity · head to head
authentik vs Entrust Identity as a Service

authentik
Cybersecurity
Open-source identity provider with flexible authentication flows
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Entrust Identity as a Service
Cybersecurity
Workforce and customer authentication from a certificate authority
- From
- $2/month
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only authentik has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: authentik smaller project than Keycloak, with a correspondingly smaller community and fewer integration guides; Entrust Identity as a Service the application integration catalogue is smaller than that of the dedicated identity vendors, so uncommon SaaS applications more often need custom SAML configuration rather than a template.
- They diverge on capability: authentik covers Configurable flows, Entrust Identity as a Service covers Multi-factor authentication.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which authentik and Entrust Identity as a Service actually diverge.
| Attribute | authentik | Entrust Identity as a Service |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free | $2/month |
| Pricing model | Open-source core with a paid enterprise tier | Per user per month |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Platforms | Docker, Kubernetes, Linux, Self-hosted | Web, iOS, Android, Windows, Linux |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cybersecurity).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in authentik
- Configurable flows
- Protocol support
- Application proxy
- Modern admin interface
Only in Entrust Identity as a Service
- Multi-factor authentication
- Single sign-on
- Adaptive authentication
- Passwordless login
- Credential lifecycle
- Derived PIV credentials
- Directory integration
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
authentik
- Self-hosted SSO across internal services without commercial identity pricingnot Entrust Identity as a Service
- Putting authentication in front of applications that have none, via the proxynot Entrust Identity as a Service
- Teams who tried Keycloak and wanted something less heavynot Entrust Identity as a Service
Entrust Identity as a Service
- A government agency needing derived mobile credentials from an existing PIV smart card estatenot authentik
- A bank that must support hardware tokens for corporate treasury users alongside push authentication for staffnot authentik
- An organisation already buying Entrust certificates that wants credential issuance and authentication from one vendornot authentik
- A defence supplier required to use certificate-based authentication that mainstream cloud identity products handle poorlynot authentik
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
authentik
- Smaller project than Keycloak, with a correspondingly smaller community and fewer integration guides
- The flow model is flexible but conceptually unfamiliar, and simple setups can feel over-abstracted
- Enterprise support and some governance features sit behind the paid tier
- Self-hosted identity is still yours to secure, patch and keep available
Entrust Identity as a Service
- The application integration catalogue is smaller than that of the dedicated identity vendors, so uncommon SaaS applications more often need custom SAML configuration rather than a template.
- Developer experience for customer identity use cases is behind the specialists, and teams building consumer signup flows will find the APIs and documentation less complete.
- Advanced capabilities including adaptive authentication and credential management sit above the published entry price, so the two dollar figure rarely reflects what a regulated buyer actually spends.
- There are two overlapping products, Identity as a Service and Identity Enterprise, and choosing wrongly at the start means a migration later rather than a licence change.
- Identity governance, access certification and privileged access are not covered, so an organisation with audit-driven access review requirements needs a second vendor alongside it.
Pricing, plan by plan
authentik
Free- Open sourceFree
- Full identity provider
- All protocols
- Community support
Entrust Identity as a Service
$2/month- Workforce Standard$2/month
- Multi-factor authentication
- Single sign-on
- Directory integration
- Higher tiers$undefined/month
- Adaptive risk-based authentication
- Certificate and smart card credential management
- Derived PIV credentials
Which should you pick?
Choose authentik if
- You need configurable flows.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Docker, Kubernetes, Linux, Self-hosted.
- You also want protocol support.
Choose Entrust Identity as a Service if
- You need multi-factor authentication.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android, Windows, Linux.
- You also want single sign-on.
Questions people ask
- Is authentik or Entrust Identity as a Service better?
- Neither clearly leads. authentik starts at Free and Entrust Identity as a Service at $2/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, authentik or Entrust Identity as a Service?
- authentik has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for authentik and $2/month for Entrust Identity as a Service.
- Does authentik or Entrust Identity as a Service run on more platforms?
- authentik runs on Docker, Kubernetes, Linux, Self-hosted. Entrust Identity as a Service runs on Web, iOS, Android, Windows, Linux.
- Can I use authentik for free?
- Yes. authentik has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Entrust Identity as a Service starts at $2/month.
- What is authentik best used for?
- authentik is most often used for self-hosted sso across internal services without commercial identity pricing, putting authentication in front of applications that have none, via the proxy, teams who tried keycloak and wanted something less heavy. Of those, self-hosted sso across internal services without commercial identity pricing and putting authentication in front of applications that have none, via the proxy are not what Entrust Identity as a Service is typically brought in for.
- What can authentik do that Entrust Identity as a Service cannot?
- authentik covers Configurable flows, Protocol support, Application proxy, Modern admin interface. Entrust Identity as a Service covers Multi-factor authentication, Single sign-on, Adaptive authentication, Passwordless login.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
authentik: Is authentik free?
The open-source edition is free and complete for most use. An enterprise tier adds support and additional features.
Entrust Identity as a Service: Is MFA included or extra?
Multi-factor authentication is included in the workforce bundles rather than sold separately, which is not true of every competitor. Adaptive risk-based authentication sits in higher tiers.
authentik: authentik or Keycloak?
authentik is generally reported as easier to run and administer; Keycloak is more established with a larger community and Red Hat behind it.
Entrust Identity as a Service: Does it do identity governance?
No. Access certification, role mining and joiner-mover-leaver governance require a separate product such as SailPoint or Saviynt.
authentik: Can authentik protect apps with no login of their own?
Yes. Its application proxy places authentication in front of services that have no built-in authentication.
Entrust Identity as a Service: Why choose this over Okta or Entra ID?
Almost always because of PKI, smart cards or derived credentials. Without that requirement the mainstream platforms are the stronger general purpose choice.
Related pages
More on Entrust Identity as a Service
Other head to heads
- authentik vs Authelia
- authentik vs Logto
- authentik vs Ory
- authentik vs Passbolt
- authentik vs Clerk
- authentik vs 1Password
- authentik vs Frontegg
- authentik vs OWASP ZAP
- authentik vs Infisical
- authentik vs Chainguard
- authentik vs Bitwarden
- authentik vs Cosign
- authentik vs CyberGhost VPN
- authentik vs Dahua Technology
- authentik vs Descope
- authentik vs Drata
- authentik vs DTiQ
- authentik vs Ory Kratos
- authentik vs Cisco Duo
- authentik vs JumpCloud
- authentik vs Ping Identity
- authentik vs Beyond Identity
- authentik vs Transmit Security
- authentik vs Akeyless
- authentik vs Speakeasy
- authentik vs Authy
- authentik vs ExpressVPN
- authentik vs Falco
- authentik vs Fenergo
- authentik vs Google Authenticator
- authentik vs Grype
- authentik vs Hanwha Vision
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Authelia
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Logto
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Ory
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Passbolt
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Clerk
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs 1Password
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Frontegg
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs OWASP ZAP
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Infisical
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Chainguard
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Bitwarden
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Cosign
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs CyberGhost VPN
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Dahua Technology
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Descope
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Drata
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs DTiQ
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Ory Kratos
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Cisco Duo
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs JumpCloud
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Ping Identity
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Beyond Identity
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Transmit Security
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Akeyless
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Speakeasy
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Authy
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs ExpressVPN
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Falco
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Fenergo
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Google Authenticator
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Grype
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Hanwha Vision
