Cybersecurity · head to head
authentik vs Hanwha Vision

authentik
Cybersecurity
Open-source identity provider with flexible authentication flows
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Hanwha Vision
Cybersecurity
Korean camera maker whose Wisenet WAVE VMS licences are perpetual per channel with no annual renewal
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only authentik has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: authentik smaller project than Keycloak, with a correspondingly smaller community and fewer integration guides; Hanwha Vision nDAA compliance is confirmed per model and per bill of materials rather than across the brand, and TAA status depends on whether a specific unit was made in Korea or Vietnam, so a buyer with procurement obligations must get both stated on the quote rather than relying on a brand-level claim.
- They diverge on capability: authentik covers Configurable flows, Hanwha Vision covers Wisenet WAVE VMS.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which authentik and Hanwha Vision actually diverge.
| Attribute | authentik | Hanwha Vision |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free | On request |
| Pricing model | Open-source core with a paid enterprise tier | One-time purchase |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Platforms | Docker, Kubernetes, Linux, Self-hosted | Windows, Linux, Web, iOS, Android |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cybersecurity).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in authentik
- Configurable flows
- Protocol support
- Application proxy
- Modern admin interface
Only in Hanwha Vision
- Wisenet WAVE VMS
- On-camera AI
- NDAA and TAA positioning
- Multi-site management
- Open platform
- Wisenet cameras and recorders
- Cybersecurity hardening
- Integration licences
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
authentik
- Self-hosted SSO across internal services without commercial identity pricingnot Hanwha Vision
- Putting authentication in front of applications that have none, via the proxynot Hanwha Vision
- Teams who tried Keycloak and wanted something less heavynot Hanwha Vision
Hanwha Vision
- A federal agency or federal contractor whose procurement rules exclude Section 889 covered manufacturersnot authentik
- A school district that wants a fixed one-time software cost rather than a per-camera monthly subscriptionnot authentik
- A site running 200 cameras for a decade where a cloud subscription would cost several times a perpetual licencenot authentik
- An integrator standardising on one manufacturer for cameras, recorders and VMS to simplify supportnot authentik
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
authentik
- Smaller project than Keycloak, with a correspondingly smaller community and fewer integration guides
- The flow model is flexible but conceptually unfamiliar, and simple setups can feel over-abstracted
- Enterprise support and some governance features sit behind the paid tier
- Self-hosted identity is still yours to secure, patch and keep available
Hanwha Vision
- NDAA compliance is confirmed per model and per bill of materials rather than across the brand, and TAA status depends on whether a specific unit was made in Korea or Vietnam, so a buyer with procurement obligations must get both stated on the quote rather than relying on a brand-level claim.
- Perpetual licences mean you own the servers, storage and patching, so the cost avoided on subscription reappears as IT labour and a hardware refresh every five to seven years.
- Hanwha publishes no list pricing and sells through distributors, so the perpetual-versus-subscription comparison it wins on paper still requires a distributor quote to verify.
- Wisenet WAVE is a solid mid-market VMS but does not match Genetec or Milestone on enterprise features such as federation across independently owned systems, scripted operator procedures or deep access control unification.
- Hanwha Vision is part of Hanwha Group, a large Korean conglomerate spanning defence, chemicals and finance, so the video business is one line among many and roadmap priority is set at a corporate level well above the security division.
Pricing, plan by plan
authentik
Free- Open sourceFree
- Full identity provider
- All protocols
- Community support
Hanwha Vision
On request- Wisenet WAVE channel licence$undefined/year
- Perpetual per-channel licence that does not expire once activated
- No annual renewal fee to keep the system running
- Sold singly and in 4, 8, 16, 24 and 48 channel bundles
Which should you pick?
Choose authentik if
- You need configurable flows.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Docker, Kubernetes, Linux, Self-hosted.
- You also want protocol support.
Choose Hanwha Vision if
- You need wisenet wave vms.
- You work on Windows, Linux, Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want on-camera ai.
Questions people ask
- Is authentik or Hanwha Vision better?
- Neither clearly leads. authentik starts at Free and Hanwha Vision at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, authentik or Hanwha Vision?
- authentik has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for authentik and On request for Hanwha Vision.
- Does authentik or Hanwha Vision run on more platforms?
- authentik runs on Docker, Kubernetes, Linux, Self-hosted. Hanwha Vision runs on Windows, Linux, Web, iOS, Android.
- Can I use authentik for free?
- Yes. authentik has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Hanwha Vision starts at On request.
- What is authentik best used for?
- authentik is most often used for self-hosted sso across internal services without commercial identity pricing, putting authentication in front of applications that have none, via the proxy, teams who tried keycloak and wanted something less heavy. Of those, self-hosted sso across internal services without commercial identity pricing and putting authentication in front of applications that have none, via the proxy are not what Hanwha Vision is typically brought in for.
- What can authentik do that Hanwha Vision cannot?
- authentik covers Configurable flows, Protocol support, Application proxy, Modern admin interface. Hanwha Vision covers Wisenet WAVE VMS, On-camera AI, NDAA and TAA positioning, Multi-site management.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
authentik: Is authentik free?
The open-source edition is free and complete for most use. An enterprise tier adds support and additional features.
Hanwha Vision: Is Hanwha Vision NDAA compliant?
Hanwha is a South Korean manufacturer and is not among the Section 889 covered entities, which are Hikvision, Dahua, Huawei, ZTE and Hytera, and its cameras do not use banned Chinese system-on-chip processors. Confirm compliance per model on the quote.
authentik: authentik or Keycloak?
authentik is generally reported as easier to run and administer; Keycloak is more established with a larger community and Red Hat behind it.
Hanwha Vision: Are Wisenet WAVE licences subscriptions?
No. Channel licences are perpetual and do not expire once activated, with no annual renewal fee.
authentik: Can authentik protect apps with no login of their own?
Yes. Its application proxy places authentication in front of services that have no built-in authentication.
Hanwha Vision: Is Wisenet WAVE the same as Nx Witness?
It is built on the Network Optix platform, so the two share a common core, with Hanwha adding its own camera integration and support.
Hanwha Vision: Is Hanwha TAA compliant?
Many models are, manufactured in South Korea and Vietnam, but TAA is a per-unit question tied to manufacturing origin, so it must be verified model by model.
Related pages
More on Hanwha Vision
Other head to heads
- authentik vs Authelia
- authentik vs Logto
- authentik vs Ory
- authentik vs Passbolt
- authentik vs Clerk
- authentik vs 1Password
- authentik vs Frontegg
- authentik vs OWASP ZAP
- authentik vs Infisical
- authentik vs Chainguard
- authentik vs Bitwarden
- authentik vs Cosign
- authentik vs CyberGhost VPN
- authentik vs Dahua Technology
- authentik vs Descope
- authentik vs Drata
- authentik vs DTiQ
- authentik vs Ory Kratos
- authentik vs Genetec Security Center
- authentik vs Eagle Eye Networks
- authentik vs Milestone XProtect
- authentik vs VIVOTEK VAST Security Station
- authentik vs Salient CompleteView
- authentik vs March Networks
- authentik vs Envysion
- authentik vs Rhombus Systems
- authentik vs Camio
- authentik vs Trend Micro Vision One
- authentik vs Entrust Identity as a Service
- authentik vs Sophos Intercept X
- authentik vs Splunk Enterprise Security
- authentik vs Sticky Password
- authentik vs Stytch
- authentik vs Surfshark
- authentik vs Tanium
- Hanwha Vision vs Authelia
- Hanwha Vision vs Logto
- Hanwha Vision vs Ory
- Hanwha Vision vs Passbolt
- Hanwha Vision vs Clerk
- Hanwha Vision vs 1Password
- Hanwha Vision vs Frontegg
- Hanwha Vision vs OWASP ZAP
- Hanwha Vision vs Infisical
- Hanwha Vision vs Chainguard
- Hanwha Vision vs Bitwarden
- Hanwha Vision vs Cosign
- Hanwha Vision vs CyberGhost VPN
- Hanwha Vision vs Dahua Technology
- Hanwha Vision vs Descope
- Hanwha Vision vs Drata
- Hanwha Vision vs DTiQ
- Hanwha Vision vs Ory Kratos
- Hanwha Vision vs Genetec Security Center
- Hanwha Vision vs Eagle Eye Networks
- Hanwha Vision vs Milestone XProtect
- Hanwha Vision vs VIVOTEK VAST Security Station
- Hanwha Vision vs Salient CompleteView
- Hanwha Vision vs March Networks
- Hanwha Vision vs Envysion
- Hanwha Vision vs Rhombus Systems
- Hanwha Vision vs Camio
- Hanwha Vision vs Trend Micro Vision One
- Hanwha Vision vs Entrust Identity as a Service
- Hanwha Vision vs Sophos Intercept X
- Hanwha Vision vs Splunk Enterprise Security
- Hanwha Vision vs Sticky Password
- Hanwha Vision vs Stytch
- Hanwha Vision vs Surfshark
- Hanwha Vision vs Tanium
