Is authentik or Keycloak better?

Neither clearly leads. authentik starts at Free and Keycloak at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.

Which is cheaper, authentik or Keycloak?

authentik starts at Free and Keycloak at Free.

Does authentik or Keycloak run on more platforms?

authentik runs on Docker, Kubernetes, Linux, Self-hosted. Keycloak runs on Self-hosted, Docker, Kubernetes, Linux, Windows, API.

Can I use authentik for free?

Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.

What is authentik best used for?

authentik is most often used for self-hosted sso across internal services without commercial identity pricing, putting authentication in front of applications that have none, via the proxy, teams who tried keycloak and wanted something less heavy. Of those, self-hosted sso across internal services without commercial identity pricing and putting authentication in front of applications that have none, via the proxy are not what Keycloak is typically brought in for.

What can authentik do that Keycloak cannot?

authentik covers Configurable flows, Protocol support, Application proxy, Modern admin interface.

Cybersecurity · head to head

authentik vs Keycloak

authentik

Cybersecurity

Open-source identity provider with flexible authentication flows

From: Free
Rated: -

Full review Website

Keycloak

Developer Tools

Open-source identity and access management server.

From: Free
Rated: -

Full review Website

The short version

Each has a real cost: authentik smaller project than Keycloak, with a correspondingly smaller community and fewer integration guides; Keycloak requires self-hosted deployment and operational expertise to install, configure and maintain
Prices and features above were last checked on 29 August 2026.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which authentik and Keycloak actually diverge.

Attributes where authentik and Keycloak differ
Attribute	authentik	Keycloak
Pricing model	Open-source core with a paid enterprise tier	open-source
Platforms	Docker, Kubernetes, Linux, Self-hosted	Self-hosted, Docker, Kubernetes, Linux, Windows, API
Category	Cybersecurity	Developer Tools

Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in authentik

Configurable flows
Protocol support
Application proxy
Modern admin interface

Only in Keycloak

Nothing recorded that authentik does not also cover.

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

authentik

Self-hosted SSO across internal services without commercial identity pricingnot Keycloak
Putting authentication in front of applications that have none, via the proxynot Keycloak
Teams who tried Keycloak and wanted something less heavynot Keycloak

Keycloak

Organisations requiring self-hosted identity infrastructure for compliance or data residencynot authentik
Companies with existing LDAP/Active Directory systems needing federated authenticationnot authentik
Open-source projects and communities requiring free IAM without licensing costsnot authentik
Enterprises building custom identity workflows requiring fine-grained authorisationnot authentik
Teams with sufficient operational expertise to manage infrastructurenot authentik

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

authentik

Smaller project than Keycloak, with a correspondingly smaller community and fewer integration guides
The flow model is flexible but conceptually unfamiliar, and simple setups can feel over-abstracted
Enterprise support and some governance features sit behind the paid tier
Self-hosted identity is still yours to secure, patch and keep available

Keycloak

Requires self-hosted deployment and operational expertise to install, configure and maintain
No managed cloud option provided by Red Hat; organisations must operate infrastructure themselves or use third-party distributions
Clustering and high-availability configurations require additional operational knowledge
Community support only; commercial support requires third-party vendors or distributions

Pricing, plan by plan

authentik

Free

Open sourceFree
- Full identity provider
- All protocols
- Community support

Keycloak

Free

Open-sourceFree
- Full platform functionality
- Self-hosted deployment
- Community support

Which should you pick?

Choose authentik if

You need configurable flows.
You want to start without paying.
You work on Docker, Kubernetes, Linux, Self-hosted.
You also want protocol support.

authentik review

Choose Keycloak if

You want to start without paying.
You work on Self-hosted, Docker, Kubernetes, Linux, Windows, API.

Keycloak review

Questions people ask

Is authentik or Keycloak better?: Neither clearly leads. authentik starts at Free and Keycloak at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, authentik or Keycloak?: authentik starts at Free and Keycloak at Free.
Does authentik or Keycloak run on more platforms?: authentik runs on Docker, Kubernetes, Linux, Self-hosted. Keycloak runs on Self-hosted, Docker, Kubernetes, Linux, Windows, API.
Can I use authentik for free?: Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
What is authentik best used for?: authentik is most often used for self-hosted sso across internal services without commercial identity pricing, putting authentication in front of applications that have none, via the proxy, teams who tried keycloak and wanted something less heavy. Of those, self-hosted sso across internal services without commercial identity pricing and putting authentication in front of applications that have none, via the proxy are not what Keycloak is typically brought in for.
What can authentik do that Keycloak cannot?: authentik covers Configurable flows, Protocol support, Application proxy, Modern admin interface.

Answered from the vendors’ own pages

authentik: Is authentik free?

The open-source edition is free and complete for most use. An enterprise tier adds support and additional features.

Keycloak: What protocols does Keycloak support?

Keycloak supports OpenID Connect, OAuth 2.0 and SAML 2.0 protocols for authentication and authorisation.

Source

authentik: authentik or Keycloak?

authentik is generally reported as easier to run and administer; Keycloak is more established with a larger community and Red Hat behind it.

Keycloak: Can Keycloak integrate with existing user directories?

Yes. Keycloak supports user federation with LDAP and Active Directory systems, allowing organisations to leverage existing user directories.

Source

authentik: Can authentik protect apps with no login of their own?

Yes. Its application proxy places authentication in front of services that have no built-in authentication.

Keycloak: Is Keycloak free?

Yes. Keycloak is fully open-source and free to deploy and use. No licensing fees are required.

Source

authentik vs Keycloak

authentik

Keycloak

The short version

Where they differ

What each one covers

Only in authentik

Only in Keycloak

What people use each for

authentik

Keycloak

Where each one falls short

authentik

Keycloak

Pricing, plan by plan

authentik

Keycloak

Which should you pick?

Choose authentik if

Choose Keycloak if

Questions people ask

Answered from the vendors’ own pages

Related pages

More on authentik

More on Keycloak

Keep looking

Other head to heads