Cybersecurity · head to head
authentik vs Keycloak

authentik
Cybersecurity
Open-source identity provider with flexible authentication flows
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Keycloak
Developer Tools
Open-source identity and access management server.
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: authentik smaller project than Keycloak, with a correspondingly smaller community and fewer integration guides; Keycloak requires self-hosted deployment and operational expertise to install, configure and maintain
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which authentik and Keycloak actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in authentik
- Configurable flows
- Protocol support
- Application proxy
- Modern admin interface
Only in Keycloak
Nothing recorded that authentik does not also cover.
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
authentik
- Self-hosted SSO across internal services without commercial identity pricingnot Keycloak
- Putting authentication in front of applications that have none, via the proxynot Keycloak
- Teams who tried Keycloak and wanted something less heavynot Keycloak
Keycloak
- Organisations requiring self-hosted identity infrastructure for compliance or data residencynot authentik
- Companies with existing LDAP/Active Directory systems needing federated authenticationnot authentik
- Open-source projects and communities requiring free IAM without licensing costsnot authentik
- Enterprises building custom identity workflows requiring fine-grained authorisationnot authentik
- Teams with sufficient operational expertise to manage infrastructurenot authentik
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
authentik
- Smaller project than Keycloak, with a correspondingly smaller community and fewer integration guides
- The flow model is flexible but conceptually unfamiliar, and simple setups can feel over-abstracted
- Enterprise support and some governance features sit behind the paid tier
- Self-hosted identity is still yours to secure, patch and keep available
Keycloak
- Requires self-hosted deployment and operational expertise to install, configure and maintain
- No managed cloud option provided by Red Hat; organisations must operate infrastructure themselves or use third-party distributions
- Clustering and high-availability configurations require additional operational knowledge
- Community support only; commercial support requires third-party vendors or distributions
Pricing, plan by plan
authentik
Free- Open sourceFree
- Full identity provider
- All protocols
- Community support
Keycloak
Free- Open-sourceFree
- Full platform functionality
- Self-hosted deployment
- Community support
Which should you pick?
Choose authentik if
- You need configurable flows.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Docker, Kubernetes, Linux, Self-hosted.
- You also want protocol support.
Choose Keycloak if
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Self-hosted, Docker, Kubernetes, Linux, Windows, API.
Questions people ask
- Is authentik or Keycloak better?
- Neither clearly leads. authentik starts at Free and Keycloak at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, authentik or Keycloak?
- authentik starts at Free and Keycloak at Free.
- Does authentik or Keycloak run on more platforms?
- authentik runs on Docker, Kubernetes, Linux, Self-hosted. Keycloak runs on Self-hosted, Docker, Kubernetes, Linux, Windows, API.
- Can I use authentik for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is authentik best used for?
- authentik is most often used for self-hosted sso across internal services without commercial identity pricing, putting authentication in front of applications that have none, via the proxy, teams who tried keycloak and wanted something less heavy. Of those, self-hosted sso across internal services without commercial identity pricing and putting authentication in front of applications that have none, via the proxy are not what Keycloak is typically brought in for.
- What can authentik do that Keycloak cannot?
- authentik covers Configurable flows, Protocol support, Application proxy, Modern admin interface.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
authentik: Is authentik free?
The open-source edition is free and complete for most use. An enterprise tier adds support and additional features.
Keycloak: What protocols does Keycloak support?
Keycloak supports OpenID Connect, OAuth 2.0 and SAML 2.0 protocols for authentication and authorisation.
Sourceauthentik: authentik or Keycloak?
authentik is generally reported as easier to run and administer; Keycloak is more established with a larger community and Red Hat behind it.
Keycloak: Can Keycloak integrate with existing user directories?
Yes. Keycloak supports user federation with LDAP and Active Directory systems, allowing organisations to leverage existing user directories.
Sourceauthentik: Can authentik protect apps with no login of their own?
Yes. Its application proxy places authentication in front of services that have no built-in authentication.
Keycloak: Is Keycloak free?
Yes. Keycloak is fully open-source and free to deploy and use. No licensing fees are required.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- authentik vs 1Password
- authentik vs Bitdefender Total Security
- authentik vs Norton 360
- authentik vs LastPass
- authentik vs Snyk
- authentik vs Bitwarden
- authentik vs Brave Browser
- authentik vs Clerk
- authentik vs CrowdStrike Falcon
- authentik vs Kaspersky Total Security
- authentik vs Mullvad VPN
- authentik vs OneTrust
- authentik vs Private Internet Access
- authentik vs Proton Mail
- authentik vs Tuta
- authentik vs Akeyless
- authentik vs Doppler
- authentik vs Frontegg
- authentik vs Visual Studio Code
- authentik vs ESLint
- authentik vs pnpm
- authentik vs Turborepo
- authentik vs GitHub Copilot
- authentik vs Penpot
- authentik vs Rust
- authentik vs CLion
- authentik vs GNAT Pro
- authentik vs IAR Embedded Workbench
- authentik vs GNU Emacs
- authentik vs Keil MDK
- authentik vs Vite
- authentik vs Bazel
- authentik vs CodeSandbox
- authentik vs Eclipse IDE
- authentik vs Moonrepo
- authentik vs Nx Cloud
- Keycloak vs 1Password
- Keycloak vs Bitdefender Total Security
- Keycloak vs Norton 360
- Keycloak vs LastPass
- Keycloak vs Snyk
- Keycloak vs Bitwarden
- Keycloak vs Brave Browser
- Keycloak vs Clerk
- Keycloak vs CrowdStrike Falcon
- Keycloak vs Kaspersky Total Security
- Keycloak vs Mullvad VPN
- Keycloak vs OneTrust
- Keycloak vs Private Internet Access
- Keycloak vs Proton Mail
- Keycloak vs Tuta
- Keycloak vs Akeyless
- Keycloak vs Doppler
- Keycloak vs Frontegg
- Keycloak vs Visual Studio Code
- Keycloak vs ESLint
- Keycloak vs pnpm
- Keycloak vs Turborepo
- Keycloak vs GitHub Copilot
- Keycloak vs Penpot
- Keycloak vs Rust
- Keycloak vs CLion
- Keycloak vs GNAT Pro
- Keycloak vs IAR Embedded Workbench
- Keycloak vs GNU Emacs
- Keycloak vs Keil MDK
- Keycloak vs Vite
- Keycloak vs Bazel
- Keycloak vs CodeSandbox
- Keycloak vs Eclipse IDE
- Keycloak vs Moonrepo
- Keycloak vs Nx Cloud
