Cybersecurity · head to head
authentik vs IDnow

authentik
Cybersecurity
Open-source identity provider with flexible authentication flows
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

IDnow
Cybersecurity
Identity verification and qualified electronic signature for regulated European markets
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only authentik has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: authentik smaller project than Keycloak, with a correspondingly smaller community and fewer integration guides; IDnow agent-led video identification costs several times an automated check and depends on agent availability, so peak-time queues push abandonment up at exactly the moment conversion matters.
- They diverge on capability: authentik covers Configurable flows, IDnow covers VideoIdent.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which authentik and IDnow actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cybersecurity).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in authentik
- Configurable flows
- Protocol support
- Application proxy
- Modern admin interface
Only in IDnow
- VideoIdent
- AutoIdent
- eSign
- eID and NFC
- Bank identification
- EU data processing
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
authentik
- Self-hosted SSO across internal services without commercial identity pricingnot IDnow
- Putting authentication in front of applications that have none, via the proxynot IDnow
- Teams who tried Keycloak and wanted something less heavynot IDnow
IDnow
- A German bank opening regulated accounts where BaFin requires a recognised identification methodnot authentik
- An insurer needing a qualified electronic signature that will survive challenge in a European courtnot authentik
- A telecom operator meeting national SIM registration identity rules across several EU statesnot authentik
- A lender wanting automated checks for low-risk applicants and video identification only for high-value casesnot authentik
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
authentik
- Smaller project than Keycloak, with a correspondingly smaller community and fewer integration guides
- The flow model is flexible but conceptually unfamiliar, and simple setups can feel over-abstracted
- Enterprise support and some governance features sit behind the paid tier
- Self-hosted identity is still yours to secure, patch and keep available
IDnow
- Agent-led video identification costs several times an automated check and depends on agent availability, so peak-time queues push abandonment up at exactly the moment conversion matters.
- Pricing is quoted with an annual volume commitment, so the accreditation advantage comes with a floor you pay whether or not you use it.
- The product is optimised for European regulatory regimes, so buyers verifying users in North America, Asia or Africa will find coverage and cost less competitive than global specialists.
- Qualified electronic signature is a separate licence from identity verification, which surprises buyers who assumed the accredited identity check made the signature capability included.
- Integration for the regulated flows is heavier than a simple SDK drop-in because the compliant journey, including consent and recording requirements, constrains the user experience you can build.
Pricing, plan by plan
authentik
Free- Open sourceFree
- Full identity provider
- All protocols
- Community support
IDnow
On request- IDnow Platform$undefined/year
- Per-identification pricing that differs sharply between automated and agent-led methods
- Annual volume commitment typically required
- Qualified electronic signature licensed separately
Which should you pick?
Choose authentik if
- You need configurable flows.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Docker, Kubernetes, Linux, Self-hosted.
- You also want protocol support.
Choose IDnow if
- You need videoident.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android, API.
- You also want autoident.
Questions people ask
- Is authentik or IDnow better?
- Neither clearly leads. authentik starts at Free and IDnow at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, authentik or IDnow?
- authentik has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for authentik and On request for IDnow.
- Does authentik or IDnow run on more platforms?
- authentik runs on Docker, Kubernetes, Linux, Self-hosted. IDnow runs on Web, iOS, Android, API.
- Can I use authentik for free?
- Yes. authentik has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. IDnow starts at On request.
- What is authentik best used for?
- authentik is most often used for self-hosted sso across internal services without commercial identity pricing, putting authentication in front of applications that have none, via the proxy, teams who tried keycloak and wanted something less heavy. Of those, self-hosted sso across internal services without commercial identity pricing and putting authentication in front of applications that have none, via the proxy are not what IDnow is typically brought in for.
- What can authentik do that IDnow cannot?
- authentik covers Configurable flows, Protocol support, Application proxy, Modern admin interface. IDnow covers VideoIdent, AutoIdent, eSign, eID and NFC.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
authentik: Is authentik free?
The open-source edition is free and complete for most use. An enterprise tier adds support and additional features.
IDnow: Why choose it over a cheaper automated vendor?
Because in some European regimes the cheaper vendor is not legally permitted for the transaction. This is an eligibility question, not a quality one.
authentik: authentik or Keycloak?
authentik is generally reported as easier to run and administer; Keycloak is more established with a larger community and Red Hat behind it.
IDnow: Is the electronic signature included?
No. Qualified electronic signature under eIDAS is licensed separately from identity verification.
authentik: Can authentik protect apps with no login of their own?
Yes. Its application proxy places authentication in front of services that have no built-in authentication.
IDnow: Where is the data processed?
In European data centres, which is a requirement rather than a preference for many of its regulated customers.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- authentik vs Authelia
- authentik vs Logto
- authentik vs Ory
- authentik vs Passbolt
- authentik vs Clerk
- authentik vs 1Password
- authentik vs Frontegg
- authentik vs OWASP ZAP
- authentik vs Infisical
- authentik vs Chainguard
- authentik vs Bitwarden
- authentik vs Cosign
- authentik vs CyberGhost VPN
- authentik vs Dahua Technology
- authentik vs Descope
- authentik vs Drata
- authentik vs DTiQ
- authentik vs Ory Kratos
- authentik vs iDenfy
- authentik vs Veriff
- authentik vs Yoti
- authentik vs Signicat
- authentik vs Jumio
- authentik vs Trulioo
- authentik vs Shufti Pro
- authentik vs Sumsub
- authentik vs Socure
- authentik vs Fenergo
- authentik vs Quantexa
- authentik vs Salient CompleteView
- authentik vs Osano
- authentik vs Proton Mail
- authentik vs Brave Browser
- authentik vs March Networks
- IDnow vs Authelia
- IDnow vs Logto
- IDnow vs Ory
- IDnow vs Passbolt
- IDnow vs Clerk
- IDnow vs 1Password
- IDnow vs Frontegg
- IDnow vs OWASP ZAP
- IDnow vs Infisical
- IDnow vs Chainguard
- IDnow vs Bitwarden
- IDnow vs Cosign
- IDnow vs CyberGhost VPN
- IDnow vs Dahua Technology
- IDnow vs Descope
- IDnow vs Drata
- IDnow vs DTiQ
- IDnow vs Ory Kratos
- IDnow vs iDenfy
- IDnow vs Veriff
- IDnow vs Yoti
- IDnow vs Signicat
- IDnow vs Jumio
- IDnow vs Trulioo
- IDnow vs Shufti Pro
- IDnow vs Sumsub
- IDnow vs Socure
- IDnow vs Fenergo
- IDnow vs Quantexa
- IDnow vs Salient CompleteView
- IDnow vs Osano
- IDnow vs Proton Mail
- IDnow vs Brave Browser
- IDnow vs March Networks
