Cybersecurity · head to head
authentik vs Okta

authentik
Cybersecurity
Open-source identity provider with flexible authentication flows
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: authentik smaller project than Keycloak, with a correspondingly smaller community and fewer integration guides; Okta requires $1,500 annual minimum contract
- They diverge on capability: authentik covers Configurable flows, Okta covers Single sign-on (SSO).
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which authentik and Okta actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in authentik
- Configurable flows
- Protocol support
- Application proxy
- Modern admin interface
Only in Okta
- Single sign-on (SSO)
- Multi-factor authentication
- Lifecycle management
- Universal directory
- API access management
- B2B integration
- Passwordless authentication
- Adaptive MFA
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
authentik
- Self-hosted SSO across internal services without commercial identity pricingnot Okta
- Putting authentication in front of applications that have none, via the proxynot Okta
- Teams who tried Keycloak and wanted something less heavynot Okta
Okta
- Employee SSOnot authentik
- Customer identitynot authentik
- B2B integrationnot authentik
- Zero Trust securitynot authentik
- Compliancenot authentik
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
authentik
- Smaller project than Keycloak, with a correspondingly smaller community and fewer integration guides
- The flow model is flexible but conceptually unfamiliar, and simple setups can feel over-abstracted
- Enterprise support and some governance features sit behind the paid tier
- Self-hosted identity is still yours to secure, patch and keep available
Okta
- Requires $1,500 annual minimum contract
- Admin-only MFA can be vulnerable to push notification fatigue attacks
- Implementation requires significant services and integration fees in year one
Pricing, plan by plan
authentik
Free- Open sourceFree
- Full identity provider
- All protocols
- Community support
Okta
Free- Starter Suite$6/user/month
- SSO
- MFA
- Universal Directory
- Core Essentials Suite$14/user/month
- Adaptive MFA
- Privileged Access
- Lifecycle Management
- Essentials Suite$17/user/month
- Same as Core Essentials
- Most popular
- Professional Suite$undefined/custom
- Device Access
- Identity Security Posture
- Threat Protection
Which should you pick?
Choose authentik if
- You need configurable flows.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Docker, Kubernetes, Linux, Self-hosted.
- You also want protocol support.
Choose Okta if
- You need single sign-on (sso).
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, SaaS.
- You also want multi-factor authentication.
Questions people ask
- Is authentik or Okta better?
- Neither clearly leads. authentik starts at Free and Okta at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, authentik or Okta?
- authentik starts at Free and Okta at Free.
- Does authentik or Okta run on more platforms?
- authentik runs on Docker, Kubernetes, Linux, Self-hosted. Okta runs on Web, SaaS.
- Can I use authentik for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is authentik best used for?
- authentik is most often used for self-hosted sso across internal services without commercial identity pricing, putting authentication in front of applications that have none, via the proxy, teams who tried keycloak and wanted something less heavy. Of those, self-hosted sso across internal services without commercial identity pricing and putting authentication in front of applications that have none, via the proxy are not what Okta is typically brought in for.
- What can authentik do that Okta cannot?
- authentik covers Configurable flows, Protocol support, Application proxy, Modern admin interface. Okta covers Single sign-on (SSO), Multi-factor authentication, Lifecycle management, Universal directory.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
authentik: Is authentik free?
The open-source edition is free and complete for most use. An enterprise tier adds support and additional features.
Okta: What is the minimum contract for Okta Workforce Identity?
Okta requires a $1,500 annual minimum contract for Workforce Identity plans. Pricing starts at $6 per user per month (Starter) and ranges to $17 per user per month (Essentials), billed annually.
Sourceauthentik: authentik or Keycloak?
authentik is generally reported as easier to run and administer; Keycloak is more established with a larger community and Red Hat behind it.
Okta: Does Okta offer a free trial?
Yes, Okta provides a 30-day free trial so customers can explore all product capabilities before committing to a paid plan.
Sourceauthentik: Can authentik protect apps with no login of their own?
Yes. Its application proxy places authentication in front of services that have no built-in authentication.
Okta: How many pre-built integrations does Okta support?
Okta offers over 7,000 pre-built integrations with popular enterprise applications including Salesforce, Slack, Workday, Box, Confluence, and Zendesk.
SourceOkta: What security features does Okta provide for admins?
Okta provides multi-factor authentication, adaptive MFA, single logout, and identity threat detection and response. However, only 94% of Okta customers have MFA enabled for administrators.
SourceOkta: Can Okta integrate with on-premises directories?
Yes, Okta's Universal Directory and lifecycle management support cloud and on-premises identity sources, including Active Directory and LDAP.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- authentik vs 1Password
- authentik vs Bitdefender Total Security
- authentik vs Norton 360
- authentik vs LastPass
- authentik vs Snyk
- authentik vs Bitwarden
- authentik vs Brave Browser
- authentik vs Clerk
- authentik vs CrowdStrike Falcon
- authentik vs Kaspersky Total Security
- authentik vs Mullvad VPN
- authentik vs OneTrust
- authentik vs Private Internet Access
- authentik vs Proton Mail
- authentik vs Tuta
- authentik vs Akeyless
- authentik vs Doppler
- authentik vs Frontegg
- authentik vs Asana
- authentik vs ClickUp
- authentik vs Linear
- authentik vs Figma
- authentik vs Kubernetes
- authentik vs Notion
- authentik vs Datadog
- authentik vs Monday.com
- authentik vs Terraform
- authentik vs Docker
- authentik vs Greenhouse
- authentik vs Google Chrome
- authentik vs Intercom
- authentik vs Mozilla Firefox
- authentik vs PostHog
- authentik vs Redis
- authentik vs Supabase
- authentik vs Amplitude
- Okta vs 1Password
- Okta vs Bitdefender Total Security
- Okta vs Norton 360
- Okta vs LastPass
- Okta vs Snyk
- Okta vs Bitwarden
- Okta vs Brave Browser
- Okta vs Clerk
- Okta vs CrowdStrike Falcon
- Okta vs Kaspersky Total Security
- Okta vs Mullvad VPN
- Okta vs OneTrust
- Okta vs Private Internet Access
- Okta vs Proton Mail
- Okta vs Tuta
- Okta vs Akeyless
- Okta vs Doppler
- Okta vs Frontegg
- Okta vs Asana
- Okta vs ClickUp
- Okta vs Linear
- Okta vs Figma
- Okta vs Kubernetes
- Okta vs Notion
- Okta vs Datadog
- Okta vs Monday.com
- Okta vs Terraform
- Okta vs Docker
- Okta vs Greenhouse
- Okta vs Google Chrome
- Okta vs Intercom
- Okta vs Mozilla Firefox
- Okta vs PostHog
- Okta vs Redis
- Okta vs Supabase
- Okta vs Amplitude

