
Baffle
Transparent proxy that encrypts, tokenises and masks database fields without application code changes
- Linux
- Web
4 alternatives · 4 questions answered
The directory
45 products matching your filters. Each one described on the same fields, so two tools can be read against each other rather than against their own marketing.
Showing 1–24 of 45

Transparent proxy that encrypts, tokenises and masks database fields without application code changes
4 alternatives · 4 questions answered

Privileged access management, endpoint privilege management and secure remote access
3 alternatives · 3 questions answered

Data discovery and classification across cloud, on-premise and unstructured stores
3 alternatives · 4 questions answered

Large Chinese video platform that US federal buyers and federal contractors cannot lawfully use
3 alternatives · 4 questions answered

Privacy platform that finds shadow data systems and automates data subject requests across them
3 alternatives · 4 questions answered

Privileged access management from the merged Thycotic and Centrify
3 alternatives · 3 questions answered

Board management and enterprise GRC platform assembled from Galvanize, Steele and Diligent Boards
4 alternatives · 4 questions answered

Managed video loss prevention with human auditors for restaurants, convenience stores and retail
3 alternatives · 4 questions answered

Managed video for restaurants and convenience stores that pairs camera footage with point of sale transaction data
3 alternatives · 4 questions answered

Adaptive behavioural analytics for payment fraud and financial crime
2 alternatives · 3 questions answered

Real-time transaction fraud and financial crime detection for banks and payment processors
2 alternatives · 3 questions answered

Client lifecycle management and KYC onboarding for regulated financial institutions
2 alternatives · 3 questions answered

Unified video, access control and licence plate platform sold in perpetual channel licences plus an annual maintenance contract
3 alternatives · 4 questions answered

Physical access control, credential issuance and workforce authentication hardware and software
2 alternatives · 3 questions answered

Identity verification and qualified electronic signature for regulated European markets
3 alternatives · 3 questions answered

Document-based identity verification for regulated onboarding
2 alternatives · 3 questions answered

Enterprise risk management priced as a flat fee with unlimited users
3 alternatives · 4 questions answered

Banking and retail video with transaction overlay, sold by a Canadian firm that changed from Chinese to Taiwanese ownership
3 alternatives · 4 questions answered

Enterprise GRC suite for large regulated organisations, with implementation costs that exceed the licence
3 alternatives · 4 questions answered

Fixed and mobile licence plate recognition with a shared law enforcement plate database
3 alternatives · 4 questions answered

Data access governance and change auditing across Active Directory, file shares and Microsoft 365
3 alternatives · 3 questions answered

Financial crime, risk and compliance suite for regulated institutions
2 alternatives · 3 questions answered

Identity governance and administration focused on access certification and compliance evidence
3 alternatives · 3 questions answered

Quest-owned identity governance, PAM and Active Directory management
3 alternatives · 3 questions answered
Head to head
Pairings from this slice of the directory, each one checked by two reviewers who agreed a buyer would weigh the two against each other.
Browse another way
How this works
Pricing, platforms and feature lists are taken from each vendor's own pages. Limitations, answered questions and alternatives are researched separately and carry a source URL on the page that states them. Every product is described on the same fields, so two tools can be read against each other rather than against their own marketing.
Because we did not collect any. Softwr hosts no reviews, and a rating aggregated from somewhere else is not ours to publish as though it were an assessment we made. What is shown instead is what a tool costs, where it runs, and what it is concretely bad at.
A researcher proposes them, then two independent reviewers judge one question each: would a buyer evaluating this product seriously consider that one instead. 225 of 1,841 candidates failed and were deleted, including a font inspector matched to a dark mode extension. Only pairings that survived both rounds are published.
Not to be listed. A vendor can buy a place in the results on the home page, on a category listing or on the catalogue, and where they do the result carries a Sponsored label. Everything not carrying that label is ordered on the same criteria as everything else, and a paid place never changes where an unpaid one lands: the editorial order flows around it. Where a link earns a commission that is disclosed on the page carrying it.
Prices and plan limits move without notice, so treat anything with a number on it as a starting point and check the vendor before you buy. Where a claim could go stale it carries the source it came from, which is the fastest way to tell.
Something missing here?
Anyone can submit a tool. A person reads every submission, checks the pricing against the vendor’s own page, and nothing is published until it passes.